Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Breaking: Debbie Wasserman-Schulz' IT staffer arrested while trying to flee US "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Looks like Jeff needs to brush up on the history of his hero's... https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_senior_thesis?wprov=sfla1[/quote] I thought it was well-known that HRC wrote her thesis on Alinsky. Jeff didn't know that?[/quote] ...even more....it gets worse... When she interviewed Alinsky, he offered her a job. And not only that, but Clinton contacted Wellsley shortly after he won the WH to request that all theses be "under lock and key." Couldn't have the public knowing what an Alinskyite his wife was. https://www.conservativereview.com/articles/alinskys-daughter-heres-the-truth-about-hillary-the-media-wont-tell-you[/quote] You know all these things, yet you do not realize that her thesis rejected Saul Alinsky's methods as ineffective. What is your media, and why didn't they tell you this???[/quote] If you know so much, you would know that while she rejected his tactics, she did not reject his goals. She merely realized that the better way to achieve "social justice" (to use a term libs would understand) would be to work through government - not the organization model that Alinsky espoused. Re the media, I'd be interested in where you get your news. Since I want a broad perspective, I watch or read CNN, FOX, C-SPAN, the WaPo (although it is increasingly making my stomach turn), the WSJ, Washington Times, and others. Reporting from the left, middle, and center.[/quote] Hold it, so Clinton rejected Alinsky's tactics, yet conservatives are mindless repeating "Alinsky #1" and "Alinsky #7" and then asking if we have read Clinton's thesis? There is no way to interpret this than it meaning conservatives have no idea about what they are talking. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics