GOP endorsed school board candidates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AAP on its way out now too. It’ll take a while for dem voters to feel the impact. But by then, they will have probably convinced themselves it was for the best.

The democrats running FCPS hate the AAP program. They are working to dismantle it.

Just look at the new “HOPE” rating scale the democrats put in place instead of the old, academic-focused scale:

https://www.fcps.edu/system/files/forms/2023-10/hoperatingscale.pdf

Democrats are deconstructing AAP in other ways too, including E3 math.

How does E3 math deconstruct AAP?

I don’t know about deconstruct, but it definitely makes it hard to take Algebra in 7th since it doesn’t teach the same compacted math schedule current advanced math does. It will result in one year less acceleration which is just a small part of watering down AAP and advanced academics as a whole in the county.

Which schools were they targeting for E3? Any of the AAP schools? Or the lower-performing elementary schools?

There was a thread on it a bit ago, but it’s in 20 schools now and originally they were a few schools without LLIV.

It just seems strange that literally no details are provided by the county about their experimental math program that is in 20 schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt

But it actually is. There are even physics equations for this.

I'm sorry but just to clarify, you are you under the impression that there are physics equations that apply to an understanding of human rights?

Yes. we all live within the parameters of the science of the world and ourselves. The equations we make deal with the environment as well as human behavior and rights we deem appropriate in society.
Laws of energy apply to human rights and behavior just like all other physical laws of the world do.
There are entire fields of study that revolve around this.
Here are some examples:
https://academic.oup.com/mit-press-scholarship-online/book/19055/chapter-abstract/177463481?redirectedFrom=fulltext
https://aeon.co/essays/what-can-a-thermodynamics-of-mind-say-about-how-to-thrive
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3825144/

Fortunately, we don't have any one person responsible for making all of the decisions for humanity. So the inability to properly multi-task isn't really an issue here.

My comment was in response to this one which said that somehow equal rights for others doesn't mean fewer rights for you. That is completely false based on the finite world and our finite bodies. We are pie. The world is pie.

equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt

Nope. Equal rights for other does not mean fewer rights for you.

Rights <> resources

But it doesn't. We don't live in a vacuum. We affect each other. There is nothing someone can do that doesn't have an affecting vibration on this world.

We were actually talking about equity and equity affects others greater than equality. FCPS definitely has equal rights already and no one is disputing keeping that going. You are the one though who keeps going back and forth about equity and equality as if they are the same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AAP on its way out now too. It’ll take a while for dem voters to feel the impact. But by then, they will have probably convinced themselves it was for the best.

The democrats running FCPS hate the AAP program. They are working to dismantle it.

Just look at the new “HOPE” rating scale the democrats put in place instead of the old, academic-focused scale:

https://www.fcps.edu/system/files/forms/2023-10/hoperatingscale.pdf

Democrats are deconstructing AAP in other ways too, including E3 math.

How does E3 math deconstruct AAP?

I don’t know about deconstruct, but it definitely makes it hard to take Algebra in 7th since it doesn’t teach the same compacted math schedule current advanced math does. It will result in one year less acceleration which is just a small part of watering down AAP and advanced academics as a whole in the county.

Which schools were they targeting for E3? Any of the AAP schools? Or the lower-performing elementary schools?

There was a thread on it a bit ago, but it’s in 20 schools now and originally they were a few schools without LLIV.

It just seems strange that literally no details are provided by the county about their experimental math program that is in 20 schools.

Did the schools in this experiment get any information on it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt

But it actually is. There are even physics equations for this.

I'm sorry but just to clarify, you are you under the impression that there are physics equations that apply to an understanding of human rights?

Yes. we all live within the parameters of the science of the world and ourselves. The equations we make deal with the environment as well as human behavior and rights we deem appropriate in society.
Laws of energy apply to human rights and behavior just like all other physical laws of the world do.
There are entire fields of study that revolve around this.
Here are some examples:
https://academic.oup.com/mit-press-scholarship-online/book/19055/chapter-abstract/177463481?redirectedFrom=fulltext
https://aeon.co/essays/what-can-a-thermodynamics-of-mind-say-about-how-to-thrive
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3825144/

Fortunately, we don't have any one person responsible for making all of the decisions for humanity. So the inability to properly multi-task isn't really an issue here.

My comment was in response to this one which said that somehow equal rights for others doesn't mean fewer rights for you. That is completely false based on the finite world and our finite bodies. We are pie. The world is pie.

equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt

Nope. Equal rights for other does not mean fewer rights for you.

Rights <> resources

But it doesn't. We don't live in a vacuum. We affect each other. There is nothing someone can do that doesn't have an affecting vibration on this world.

We were actually talking about equity and equity affects others greater than equality. FCPS definitely has equal rights already and no one is disputing keeping that going. You are the one though who keeps going back and forth about equity and equality as if they are the same.

When women finally got the right to vote in the US who lost rights?

There are multiple people posting - I'm not the poster you are referring to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AAP on its way out now too. It’ll take a while for dem voters to feel the impact. But by then, they will have probably convinced themselves it was for the best.

The democrats running FCPS hate the AAP program. They are working to dismantle it.

Just look at the new “HOPE” rating scale the democrats put in place instead of the old, academic-focused scale:

https://www.fcps.edu/system/files/forms/2023-10/hoperatingscale.pdf

Democrats are deconstructing AAP in other ways too, including E3 math.

How does E3 math deconstruct AAP?

I don’t know about deconstruct, but it definitely makes it hard to take Algebra in 7th since it doesn’t teach the same compacted math schedule current advanced math does. It will result in one year less acceleration which is just a small part of watering down AAP and advanced academics as a whole in the county.

Which schools were they targeting for E3? Any of the AAP schools? Or the lower-performing elementary schools?

There was a thread on it a bit ago, but it’s in 20 schools now and originally they were a few schools without LLIV.

It just seems strange that literally no details are provided by the county about their experimental math program that is in 20 schools.

Did the schools in this experiment get any information on it?

Where is the list of 20 schools?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt

But it actually is. There are even physics equations for this.

I'm sorry but just to clarify, you are you under the impression that there are physics equations that apply to an understanding of human rights?

Yes. we all live within the parameters of the science of the world and ourselves. The equations we make deal with the environment as well as human behavior and rights we deem appropriate in society.
Laws of energy apply to human rights and behavior just like all other physical laws of the world do.
There are entire fields of study that revolve around this.
Here are some examples:
https://academic.oup.com/mit-press-scholarship-online/book/19055/chapter-abstract/177463481?redirectedFrom=fulltext
https://aeon.co/essays/what-can-a-thermodynamics-of-mind-say-about-how-to-thrive
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3825144/

Fortunately, we don't have any one person responsible for making all of the decisions for humanity. So the inability to properly multi-task isn't really an issue here.

My comment was in response to this one which said that somehow equal rights for others doesn't mean fewer rights for you. That is completely false based on the finite world and our finite bodies. We are pie. The world is pie.

equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt

Nope. Equal rights for other does not mean fewer rights for you.

Rights <> resources

But it doesn't. We don't live in a vacuum. We affect each other. There is nothing someone can do that doesn't have an affecting vibration on this world.

We were actually talking about equity and equity affects others greater than equality. FCPS definitely has equal rights already and no one is disputing keeping that going. You are the one though who keeps going back and forth about equity and equality as if they are the same.

When women finally got the right to vote in the US who lost rights?

There are multiple people posting - I'm not the poster you are referring to.

Men. This is basically the crux of the political arguments. One party is more feminine energy and one more masculine energy. It changed the dynamics of politics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt

But it actually is. There are even physics equations for this.

I'm sorry but just to clarify, you are you under the impression that there are physics equations that apply to an understanding of human rights?

DP, but intuitively everyone understands that there are finite resources, and that spending every last dollar in the name of "equity" to help a child with a particular diagnosis "succeed" means that other children who have not been the subject of a diagnosis may be put at risk of failing.

I gather than some of the Republican candidates have refused to commit unlimited resources to students with certain disabilities before the election. What some activists may see as indifference may well simply be caution. As has been pointed out, Democratic candidates have a track record of making promises they don't keep and commitments they do not honor. It feels good in the moment, but leaves a bitter taste in the mouth.

They can certainly do a better job than the current SB that would encourage parents to homeschool their children they find challenging. They can do better than denying children a year of school.

Competence matter. Rachna is a HR professional, yet we are hemorrhaging teachers leaving the profession.

Karl, doesn’t have a degree, doesn’t practice a trade, isn’t an artist, and most certainly isn’t an athlete.

We’ve seen what these clowns deliver.

Karl's opponent also doesn't have a college degree. In fact Karl is closer to obtaining his college degree than Sabio is.

DP. I think the bigger issue is that Karl has no children. It should be a requirement that all SB candidates/members have children IN that school system.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt

But it actually is. There are even physics equations for this.

I'm sorry but just to clarify, you are you under the impression that there are physics equations that apply to an understanding of human rights?

DP, but intuitively everyone understands that there are finite resources, and that spending every last dollar in the name of "equity" to help a child with a particular diagnosis "succeed" means that other children who have not been the subject of a diagnosis may be put at risk of failing.

I gather than some of the Republican candidates have refused to commit unlimited resources to students with certain disabilities before the election. What some activists may see as indifference may well simply be caution. As has been pointed out, Democratic candidates have a track record of making promises they don't keep and commitments they do not honor. It feels good in the moment, but leaves a bitter taste in the mouth.

They can certainly do a better job than the current SB that would encourage parents to homeschool their children they find challenging. They can do better than denying children a year of school.

Competence matter. Rachna is a HR professional, yet we are hemorrhaging teachers leaving the profession.

Karl, doesn’t have a degree, doesn’t practice a trade, isn’t an artist, and most certainly isn’t an athlete.

We’ve seen what these clowns deliver.

Karl's opponent also doesn't have a college degree. In fact Karl is closer to obtaining his college degree than Sabio is.

Karl Frisch has no talents other than collecting money from left-wing activists in other states and wasting taxpayer money. None.

+1
It is interesting that no Democrats are willing to address these facts ^^

[Anonymous]

This is what I’m concerned about/the grass isn’t always greener:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2023-10-30/liberal-parents-join-evangelicals-in-home-schooling-their-kids-thanks-to-culture?embedded-checkout=true

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt

But it actually is. There are even physics equations for this.

I'm sorry but just to clarify, you are you under the impression that there are physics equations that apply to an understanding of human rights?

DP, but intuitively everyone understands that there are finite resources, and that spending every last dollar in the name of "equity" to help a child with a particular diagnosis "succeed" means that other children who have not been the subject of a diagnosis may be put at risk of failing.

I gather than some of the Republican candidates have refused to commit unlimited resources to students with certain disabilities before the election. What some activists may see as indifference may well simply be caution. As has been pointed out, Democratic candidates have a track record of making promises they don't keep and commitments they do not honor. It feels good in the moment, but leaves a bitter taste in the mouth.

They can certainly do a better job than the current SB that would encourage parents to homeschool their children they find challenging. They can do better than denying children a year of school.

Competence matter. Rachna is a HR professional, yet we are hemorrhaging teachers leaving the profession.

Karl, doesn’t have a degree, doesn’t practice a trade, isn’t an artist, and most certainly isn’t an athlete.

We’ve seen what these clowns deliver.

Karl's opponent also doesn't have a college degree. In fact Karl is closer to obtaining his college degree than Sabio is.

Karl Frisch has no talents other than collecting money from left-wing activists in other states and wasting taxpayer money. None.

+1
It is interesting that no Democrats are willing to address these facts ^^

They've already been discussed. Try to keep up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
When women finally got the right to vote in the US who lost rights?

Men. This is basically the crux of the political arguments. One party is more feminine energy and one more masculine energy. It changed the dynamics of politics.

Which specific rights did men lose when women finally got the right to vote?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt

But it actually is. There are even physics equations for this.

I'm sorry but just to clarify, you are you under the impression that there are physics equations that apply to an understanding of human rights?

DP, but intuitively everyone understands that there are finite resources, and that spending every last dollar in the name of "equity" to help a child with a particular diagnosis "succeed" means that other children who have not been the subject of a diagnosis may be put at risk of failing.

I gather than some of the Republican candidates have refused to commit unlimited resources to students with certain disabilities before the election. What some activists may see as indifference may well simply be caution. As has been pointed out, Democratic candidates have a track record of making promises they don't keep and commitments they do not honor. It feels good in the moment, but leaves a bitter taste in the mouth.

They can certainly do a better job than the current SB that would encourage parents to homeschool their children they find challenging. They can do better than denying children a year of school.

Competence matter. Rachna is a HR professional, yet we are hemorrhaging teachers leaving the profession.

Karl, doesn’t have a degree, doesn’t practice a trade, isn’t an artist, and most certainly isn’t an athlete.

We’ve seen what these clowns deliver.

Karl's opponent also doesn't have a college degree. In fact Karl is closer to obtaining his college degree than Sabio is.

Karl Frisch has no talents other than collecting money from left-wing activists in other states and wasting taxpayer money. None.

+1
It is interesting that no Democrats are willing to address these facts ^^

They've already been discussed. Try to keep up.

^ they have been discussed on the Karl thread. This is the thread about GOP candidates. You seem to have trouble navigating the interwebs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AAP on its way out now too. It’ll take a while for dem voters to feel the impact. But by then, they will have probably convinced themselves it was for the best.

The democrats running FCPS hate the AAP program. They are working to dismantle it.

Just look at the new “HOPE” rating scale the democrats put in place instead of the old, academic-focused scale:

https://www.fcps.edu/system/files/forms/2023-10/hoperatingscale.pdf

Democrats are deconstructing AAP in other ways too, including E3 math.

You mean the GBRSs which pretty much every parent whose kid wasn’t accepted into AAP complained about being to squishy and not able to identify gifted kids? That scale?

The only thing that would make the “GBRSs/HOPE is awful” crowd is replacing them only with CoGAT results and guaranteeing that kids who score in the 99th percentile are accepted into AAP.

[Anonymous]

Let’s be very clear this school board has done severe damage to the kids with special needs during g COVID. The lawsuits spread volumes. Also has anyone gotten notifications from the fentanyl overdoses at our schools. This board has done so much damage to our schools and kids. Reid wants to reimagine everything but what does that mean for our kids future. Their claim to fame is they lowered Thomas Jefferson to 5th rating from the number one school in the country in one year and they opened the bathrooms to both girls and boys and of course tampons in all the boys bathrooms

[Anonymous]

OMG!!!! TAMPONS IN ALL OF THE BOYS BATHROOMS!!!!!! THE HORROR!!!!!!!!!!