GOP endorsed school board candidates

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:OMG!!!! TAMPONS IN ALL OF THE BOYS BATHROOMS!!!!!! THE HORROR!!!!!!!!!!


Yeah who cares, just another instance of them wasting money.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt


But it actually is. There are even physics equations for this.


I'm sorry but just to clarify, you are you under the impression that there are physics equations that apply to an understanding of human rights?


Yes. we all live within the parameters of the science of the world and ourselves. The equations we make deal with the environment as well as human behavior and rights we deem appropriate in society.
Laws of energy apply to human rights and behavior just like all other physical laws of the world do.
There are entire fields of study that revolve around this.
Here are some examples:
https://academic.oup.com/mit-press-scholarship-online/book/19055/chapter-abstract/177463481?redirectedFrom=fulltext
https://aeon.co/essays/what-can-a-thermodynamics-of-mind-say-about-how-to-thrive
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3825144/



Thank you for the spit-take. I haven’t seen this next-level out-of-touch with reality ish you are claiming since “natural law anti-redshirting” lady, and you seem to have a really oddly off-base interpretation of the topics your links are exploring.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt


But it actually is. There are even physics equations for this.


I'm sorry but just to clarify, you are you under the impression that there are physics equations that apply to an understanding of human rights?


DP, but intuitively everyone understands that there are finite resources, and that spending every last dollar in the name of "equity" to help a child with a particular diagnosis "succeed" means that other children who have not been the subject of a diagnosis may be put at risk of failing.

I gather than some of the Republican candidates have refused to commit unlimited resources to students with certain disabilities before the election. What some activists may see as indifference may well simply be caution. As has been pointed out, Democratic candidates have a track record of making promises they don't keep and commitments they do not honor. It feels good in the moment, but leaves a bitter taste in the mouth.


They can certainly do a better job than the current SB that would encourage parents to homeschool their children they find challenging. They can do better than denying children a year of school.

Competence matter. Rachna is a HR professional, yet we are hemorrhaging teachers leaving the profession.

Karl, doesn’t have a degree, doesn’t practice a trade, isn’t an artist, and most certainly isn’t an athlete.

We’ve seen what these clowns deliver.


Karl's opponent also doesn't have a college degree. In fact Karl is closer to obtaining his college degree than Sabio is.


DP. I think the bigger issue is that Karl has no children. It should be a requirement that all SB candidates/members have children IN that school system.


Karl's opponent also doesnt have a child in FCPS.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt


But it actually is. There are even physics equations for this.


I'm sorry but just to clarify, you are you under the impression that there are physics equations that apply to an understanding of human rights?


DP, but intuitively everyone understands that there are finite resources, and that spending every last dollar in the name of "equity" to help a child with a particular diagnosis "succeed" means that other children who have not been the subject of a diagnosis may be put at risk of failing.

I gather than some of the Republican candidates have refused to commit unlimited resources to students with certain disabilities before the election. What some activists may see as indifference may well simply be caution. As has been pointed out, Democratic candidates have a track record of making promises they don't keep and commitments they do not honor. It feels good in the moment, but leaves a bitter taste in the mouth.


They can certainly do a better job than the current SB that would encourage parents to homeschool their children they find challenging. They can do better than denying children a year of school.

Competence matter. Rachna is a HR professional, yet we are hemorrhaging teachers leaving the profession.

Karl, doesn’t have a degree, doesn’t practice a trade, isn’t an artist, and most certainly isn’t an athlete.

We’ve seen what these clowns deliver.


Karl's opponent also doesn't have a college degree. In fact Karl is closer to obtaining his college degree than Sabio is.


DP. I think the bigger issue is that Karl has no children. It should be a requirement that all SB candidates/members have children IN that school system.


Karl's opponent also doesnt have a child in FCPS.


Sabio is a father - I don’t know how old his child is, do you?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt


But it actually is. There are even physics equations for this.


I'm sorry but just to clarify, you are you under the impression that there are physics equations that apply to an understanding of human rights?


DP, but intuitively everyone understands that there are finite resources, and that spending every last dollar in the name of "equity" to help a child with a particular diagnosis "succeed" means that other children who have not been the subject of a diagnosis may be put at risk of failing.

I gather than some of the Republican candidates have refused to commit unlimited resources to students with certain disabilities before the election. What some activists may see as indifference may well simply be caution. As has been pointed out, Democratic candidates have a track record of making promises they don't keep and commitments they do not honor. It feels good in the moment, but leaves a bitter taste in the mouth.


They can certainly do a better job than the current SB that would encourage parents to homeschool their children they find challenging. They can do better than denying children a year of school.

Competence matter. Rachna is a HR professional, yet we are hemorrhaging teachers leaving the profession.

Karl, doesn’t have a degree, doesn’t practice a trade, isn’t an artist, and most certainly isn’t an athlete.

We’ve seen what these clowns deliver.


Karl's opponent also doesn't have a college degree. In fact Karl is closer to obtaining his college degree than Sabio is.


DP. I think the bigger issue is that Karl has no children. It should be a requirement that all SB candidates/members have children IN that school system.


Karl's opponent also doesnt have a child in FCPS.


Sabio is a father - I don’t know how old his child is, do you?


Not in school. Not that it’s relevant.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Let’s be very clear this school board has done severe damage to the kids with special needs during g COVID. The lawsuits spread volumes. Also has anyone gotten notifications from the fentanyl overdoses at our schools. This board has done so much damage to our schools and kids. Reid wants to reimagine everything but what does that mean for our kids future. Their claim to fame is they lowered Thomas Jefferson to 5th rating from the number one school in the country in one year and they opened the bathrooms to both girls and boys and of course tampons in all the boys bathrooms

Completely agree.

Additionally, when they bullied kids into wearing masks long after it was established they were considered medically unnecessary and were no longer a mandate per the Governor of Virginia, the ones more affected by the illegal enforcement of masks were students with special needs. Also, why their silence on the fentanyl crisis that has permeated our schools and has already taken so many young lives across the country?

Anonymous
Gop candidates if you vote red you are brainwashed fact
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:OMG!!!! TAMPONS IN ALL OF THE BOYS BATHROOMS!!!!!! THE HORROR!!!!!!!!!!


They can’t manage to stock some bathrooms with toilet paper or provide running water, but the Democrats think it’s still great to spend money on tampons. Priorities, people.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Let’s be very clear this school board has done severe damage to the kids with special needs during g COVID. The lawsuits spread volumes. Also has anyone gotten notifications from the fentanyl overdoses at our schools. This board has done so much damage to our schools and kids. Reid wants to reimagine everything but what does that mean for our kids future. Their claim to fame is they lowered Thomas Jefferson to 5th rating from the number one school in the country in one year and they opened the bathrooms to both girls and boys and of course tampons in all the boys bathrooms

Completely agree.

Additionally, when they bullied kids into wearing masks long after it was established they were considered medically unnecessary and were no longer a mandate per the Governor of Virginia, the ones more affected by the illegal enforcement of masks were students with special needs. Also, why their silence on the fentanyl crisis that has permeated our schools and has already taken so many young lives across the
.

Woo hoo come see dumb cult member

Give up your kids you are unfit to parent. Stop watching fox propaganda god how are you so stupid
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Let’s be very clear this school board has done severe damage to the kids with special needs during g COVID. The lawsuits spread volumes. Also has anyone gotten notifications from the fentanyl overdoses at our schools. This board has done so much damage to our schools and kids. Reid wants to reimagine everything but what does that mean for our kids future. Their claim to fame is they lowered Thomas Jefferson to 5th rating from the number one school in the country in one year and they opened the bathrooms to both girls and boys and of course tampons in all the boys bathrooms

Completely agree.

Additionally, when they bullied kids into wearing masks long after it was established they were considered medically unnecessary and were no longer a mandate per the Governor of Virginia, the ones more affected by the illegal enforcement of masks were students with special needs. Also, why their silence on the fentanyl crisis that has permeated our schools and has already taken so many young lives across the country?



They aren’t silent on fentanyl.

https://wtop.com/fairfax-county/2023/05/fairfax-co-school-board-approves-plan-to-provide-students-staff-access-to-narcan-in-all-classrooms/

The Fairfax County, Virginia, school board approved a plan Thursday night to provide staff and students with access to fentanyl testing strips and to place Narcan in all classrooms.

The board is also looking at the possibility of creating a special high school for kids to recover from addiction.

The proposal was co-sponsored by school board members Karl Frisch and Laura Jane Cohen.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Let’s be very clear this school board has done severe damage to the kids with special needs during g COVID. The lawsuits spread volumes. Also has anyone gotten notifications from the fentanyl overdoses at our schools. This board has done so much damage to our schools and kids. Reid wants to reimagine everything but what does that mean for our kids future. Their claim to fame is they lowered Thomas Jefferson to 5th rating from the number one school in the country in one year and they opened the bathrooms to both girls and boys and of course tampons in all the boys bathrooms

Completely agree.

Additionally, when they bullied kids into wearing masks long after it was established they were considered medically unnecessary and were no longer a mandate per the Governor of Virginia, the ones more affected by the illegal enforcement of masks were students with special needs. Also, why their silence on the fentanyl crisis that has permeated our schools and has already taken so many young lives across the country?



They aren’t silent on fentanyl.

https://wtop.com/fairfax-county/2023/05/fairfax-co-school-board-approves-plan-to-provide-students-staff-access-to-narcan-in-all-classrooms/

The Fairfax County, Virginia, school board approved a plan Thursday night to provide staff and students with access to fentanyl testing strips and to place Narcan in all classrooms.

The board is also looking at the possibility of creating a special high school for kids to recover from addiction.

The proposal was co-sponsored by school board members Karl Frisch and Laura Jane Cohen.


Do they have money for this? It's a good idea but I don't know how they fund it. Or staff it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:equal rights for others does not mean fewer rights for you. it is not pie.

-my favroite tshirt


But it actually is. There are even physics equations for this.


I'm sorry but just to clarify, you are you under the impression that there are physics equations that apply to an understanding of human rights?


DP, but intuitively everyone understands that there are finite resources, and that spending every last dollar in the name of "equity" to help a child with a particular diagnosis "succeed" means that other children who have not been the subject of a diagnosis may be put at risk of failing.

I gather than some of the Republican candidates have refused to commit unlimited resources to students with certain disabilities before the election. What some activists may see as indifference may well simply be caution. As has been pointed out, Democratic candidates have a track record of making promises they don't keep and commitments they do not honor. It feels good in the moment, but leaves a bitter taste in the mouth.


They can certainly do a better job than the current SB that would encourage parents to homeschool their children they find challenging. They can do better than denying children a year of school.

Competence matter. Rachna is a HR professional, yet we are hemorrhaging teachers leaving the profession.

Karl, doesn’t have a degree, doesn’t practice a trade, isn’t an artist, and most certainly isn’t an athlete.

We’ve seen what these clowns deliver.


Karl's opponent also doesn't have a college degree. In fact Karl is closer to obtaining his college degree than Sabio is.


DP. I think the bigger issue is that Karl has no children. It should be a requirement that all SB candidates/members have children IN that school system.


Karl's opponent also doesnt have a child in FCPS.


Sabio is a father - I don’t know how old his child is, do you?


Not in school. Not that it’s relevant.


DP
I also don’t think it’s relevant in the whole scheme of things, but the PP was responding to the opinion that SB candidates should “have children IN that school system”. It is relevant to that post.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:OMG!!!! TAMPONS IN ALL OF THE BOYS BATHROOMS!!!!!! THE HORROR!!!!!!!!!!


Do they actually do this? I only ask because they don’t stock our ES staff restroom with them. The school used to even have wall dispensers but they took those out of the staff restrooms last year.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Let’s be very clear this school board has done severe damage to the kids with special needs during g COVID. The lawsuits spread volumes. Also has anyone gotten notifications from the fentanyl overdoses at our schools. This board has done so much damage to our schools and kids. Reid wants to reimagine everything but what does that mean for our kids future. Their claim to fame is they lowered Thomas Jefferson to 5th rating from the number one school in the country in one year and they opened the bathrooms to both girls and boys and of course tampons in all the boys bathrooms

Completely agree.

Additionally, when they bullied kids into wearing masks long after it was established they were considered medically unnecessary and were no longer a mandate per the Governor of Virginia, the ones more affected by the illegal enforcement of masks were students with special needs. Also, why their silence on the fentanyl crisis that has permeated our schools and has already taken so many young lives across the country?



They aren’t silent on fentanyl.

https://wtop.com/fairfax-county/2023/05/fairfax-co-school-board-approves-plan-to-provide-students-staff-access-to-narcan-in-all-classrooms/

The Fairfax County, Virginia, school board approved a plan Thursday night to provide staff and students with access to fentanyl testing strips and to place Narcan in all classrooms.

The board is also looking at the possibility of creating a special high school for kids to recover from addiction.

The proposal was co-sponsored by school board members Karl Frisch and Laura Jane Cohen.


Do they have money for this? It's a good idea but I don't know how they fund it. Or staff it.


It would probably be relatively small. I wonder if the funding could come from outside FCPS budget since it’s part of recovery?

Maryland has one:
https://wtop.com/health-fitness/2023/05/unseen-and-unheard-unique-maryland-high-school-aims-to-help-students-beat-addiction/
Anonymous
Karl Frisch has a dog, but no kids, so I think we should put him in charge of a dog park and leave education to parents, not left-wing activists.
post reply Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: