Update regarding Ukranian adopted daughter (now with Indiana family)

[Anonymous]

Will they be able to find out how old she is?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7507767/Ukranian-dwarf-masqueraded-child-living-new-family.html

[Anonymous]

Wait I thought bone scans showed she was definitively like 30, lol why did they put her with a new couple????

Good luck to the new parents, they're gonna need it.

[Anonymous]

Oh lord. This homicidal dwarf gonna kill y'all.

[Anonymous]

I know she has a form of dwarfism, but she still looks much older than 16.

[Anonymous]

I am so confused by the whole story. So she is or isn't really 30? Also it sounds like the original family got rid of her five years ago, so not sure why we're just now hearing about it/charges are being pressed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am so confused by the whole story. So she is or isn't really 30? Also it sounds like the original family got rid of her five years ago, so not sure why we're just now hearing about it/charges are being pressed.

Nobody knows how old she is.

[Anonymous]

Anyone see the film Orphan?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am so confused by the whole story. So she is or isn't really 30? Also it sounds like the original family got rid of her five years ago, so not sure why we're just now hearing about it/charges are being pressed.

They were the second family. The very first adoption fell through, then the family with the autistic child adopted her. Then another family camr forward but backed oout at the last minute. This new family is the fourth (unless there were more).

[Anonymous]

Sad all around. I hope she finds the help she needs, whatever her age.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am so confused by the whole story. So she is or isn't really 30? Also it sounds like the original family got rid of her five years ago, so not sure why we're just now hearing about it/charges are being pressed.

They were the second family. The very first adoption fell through, then the family with the autistic child adopted her. Then another family camr forward but backed oout at the last minute. This new family is the fourth (unless there were more).

It didn’t really fall through—the first family had her for a year or two and then renounced her. That in and of itself is beyond ridiculous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am so confused by the whole story. So she is or isn't really 30? Also it sounds like the original family got rid of her five years ago, so not sure why we're just now hearing about it/charges are being pressed.

The article states a second court ruling upheld her adult age. Definitely an adult who wishes to be cared for like a child. Hope she gets the mental health services she obviously needs.

[Anonymous]

The new family is going on the adoption bing, probably for the money. She comes with social security payments so its a win for the family and a win for her as she's taken care of.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The new family is going on the adoption bing, probably for the money. She comes with social security payments so its a win for the family and a win for her as she's taken care of.

If the previous adoptive family’s accusations are true she could be a danger to the current adoptive family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The new family is going on the adoption bing, probably for the money. She comes with social security payments so its a win for the family and a win for her as she's taken care of.

If the previous adoptive family’s accusations are true she could be a danger to the current adoptive family.

They clearly know and don't care. Agree otherwise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wait I thought bone scans showed she was definitively like 30, lol why did they put her with a new couple????

Good luck to the new parents, they're gonna need it.

She had bone scans in 2010 and 2012 and they places her age as being 8 and 11.