Trump says he's agreed to Fox debate while Harris sticks with ABC plan

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Omg I just saw a clip where a reporter asked Kamala how she was going to pay for her new “economic policy” and her answer (without the help of notes or a teleprompter) was basically “if you invest in the community it will pay for itself.”
😳😳

What is confusing or shocking about that?
Societal good is good for the economy.

Wow. You’re just as dumb as she is.

[Anonymous]

Fixed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Omg I just saw a clip where a reporter asked Kamala how she was going to pay for her new “economic policy” and her answer (without the help of notes or a teleprompter) was basically “if you invest in the community it will pay for itself.”
😳😳

What is confusing or shocking about that?
Societal good is good for the economy.

No. If that was the case, I would confiscate everything you own for my definition of society. You would have a loss as an individual and I would have a gain as an individual at your expense.

[Anonymous]

Kamala: "So we agree to the original terms of the debate?"

Trump: "Okay, I agree."

Kamala: "Cool. the debate about debates is over."

*two weeks of debate prep later*

Kamala: "Actually, we want to change the rules."

Trump: "You can't do that. We already signed off on them."

Kamala: "Why are you so afraid to debate!?"

[Anonymous]

From what I am seeing, Trump unscripted said he wanted to debate without muted mics to try to make Harris look scaredand so the Harris campaign said that she too would like to debate without muted mics. So this is a long twisted saga about him trying to back out of what he said (that he wanted to debate without muted mics) by calling her a chicken and makings ungrounded accusations against ABC.

I get it, Trump unmuted is a whole can of worms for his campaign.

The challenge is how to admit he does not actually want muted mics without looking like his staff doesn’t trust him.

[Anonymous]

Oops, typo, he does not want UNmuted mics (or at least his staff doesn’t)

[Anonymous]

Actually, the challenge is for Kamala to stick to what she agreed to weeks ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Omg I just saw a clip where a reporter asked Kamala how she was going to pay for her new “economic policy” and her answer (without the help of notes or a teleprompter) was basically “if you invest in the community it will pay for itself.”
😳😳

What is confusing or shocking about that?
Societal good is good for the economy.

No. If that was the case, I would confiscate everything you own for my definition of society. You would have a loss as an individual and I would have a gain as an individual at your expense.

Oh. I see. You are very confused.
Can you point to where Harris has suggested the government confiscate everything you own?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Omg I just saw a clip where a reporter asked Kamala how she was going to pay for her new “economic policy” and her answer (without the help of notes or a teleprompter) was basically “if you invest in the community it will pay for itself.”
😳😳

What is confusing or shocking about that?
Societal good is good for the economy.

Wow. You’re just as dumb as she is.

Do a thought exercise...

Invest in neo-natal and youth health, provided annual check-ups and dental care and school based breakfast and lunch if desired...and what are the chances that kid has a better health and education outcome than if none of these things were available. And then, if those things are not available, for the kid who didn't have them, how productive will they be in society? What are the chances their poor dental care results in worse macro-health outcomes? How formed is their brain? Will they be someone who is productive to society or someone who drains society for decades, perhaps in jail?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Omg I just saw a clip where a reporter asked Kamala how she was going to pay for her new “economic policy” and her answer (without the help of notes or a teleprompter) was basically “if you invest in the community it will pay for itself.”
😳😳

What is confusing or shocking about that?
Societal good is good for the economy.

Wow. You’re just as dumb as she is.

Do a thought exercise...

Invest in neo-natal and youth health, provided annual check-ups and dental care and school based breakfast and lunch if desired...and what are the chances that kid has a better health and education outcome than if none of these things were available. And then, if those things are not available, for the kid who didn't have them, how productive will they be in society? What are the chances their poor dental care results in worse macro-health outcomes? How formed is their brain? Will they be someone who is productive to society or someone who drains society for decades, perhaps in jail?

The question is where is the money for this “investment” coming from?
I can’t believe I actually had to explain that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Omg I just saw a clip where a reporter asked Kamala how she was going to pay for her new “economic policy” and her answer (without the help of notes or a teleprompter) was basically “if you invest in the community it will pay for itself.”
😳😳

What is confusing or shocking about that?
Societal good is good for the economy.

Wow. You’re just as dumb as she is.

Do a thought exercise...

Invest in neo-natal and youth health, provided annual check-ups and dental care and school based breakfast and lunch if desired...and what are the chances that kid has a better health and education outcome than if none of these things were available. And then, if those things are not available, for the kid who didn't have them, how productive will they be in society? What are the chances their poor dental care results in worse macro-health outcomes? How formed is their brain? Will they be someone who is productive to society or someone who drains society for decades, perhaps in jail?

The question is where is the money for this “investment” coming from?
I can’t believe I actually had to explain that.

Dp- are you aware that the federal government collects taxes?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Omg I just saw a clip where a reporter asked Kamala how she was going to pay for her new “economic policy” and her answer (without the help of notes or a teleprompter) was basically “if you invest in the community it will pay for itself.”
😳😳

OMG, I saw that clip last week and I thought she did a nice job of explaining it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Omg I just saw a clip where a reporter asked Kamala how she was going to pay for her new “economic policy” and her answer (without the help of notes or a teleprompter) was basically “if you invest in the community it will pay for itself.”
😳😳

What is confusing or shocking about that?
Societal good is good for the economy.

Wow. You’re just as dumb as she is.

Do a thought exercise...

Invest in neo-natal and youth health, provided annual check-ups and dental care and school based breakfast and lunch if desired...and what are the chances that kid has a better health and education outcome than if none of these things were available. And then, if those things are not available, for the kid who didn't have them, how productive will they be in society? What are the chances their poor dental care results in worse macro-health outcomes? How formed is their brain? Will they be someone who is productive to society or someone who drains society for decades, perhaps in jail?

The question is where is the money for this “investment” coming from?
I can’t believe I actually had to explain that.

Dp- are you aware that the federal government collects taxes?

Aren’t we in a deficit?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Omg I just saw a clip where a reporter asked Kamala how she was going to pay for her new “economic policy” and her answer (without the help of notes or a teleprompter) was basically “if you invest in the community it will pay for itself.”
😳😳

What is confusing or shocking about that?
Societal good is good for the economy.

Wow. You’re just as dumb as she is.

Do a thought exercise...

Invest in neo-natal and youth health, provided annual check-ups and dental care and school based breakfast and lunch if desired...and what are the chances that kid has a better health and education outcome than if none of these things were available. And then, if those things are not available, for the kid who didn't have them, how productive will they be in society? What are the chances their poor dental care results in worse macro-health outcomes? How formed is their brain? Will they be someone who is productive to society or someone who drains society for decades, perhaps in jail?

The question is where is the money for this “investment” coming from?
I can’t believe I actually had to explain that.

Dp- are you aware that the federal government collects taxes?

np- painfully aware.

The issue is KH isn’t releasing a platform, isn’t giving interviews to the press, and isn’t holding press conferences. She didn’t receive a single vote to be the dem nominee for president.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Omg I just saw a clip where a reporter asked Kamala how she was going to pay for her new “economic policy” and her answer (without the help of notes or a teleprompter) was basically “if you invest in the community it will pay for itself.”
😳😳

What is confusing or shocking about that?
Societal good is good for the economy.

Wow. You’re just as dumb as she is.

Do a thought exercise...

Invest in neo-natal and youth health, provided annual check-ups and dental care and school based breakfast and lunch if desired...and what are the chances that kid has a better health and education outcome than if none of these things were available. And then, if those things are not available, for the kid who didn't have them, how productive will they be in society? What are the chances their poor dental care results in worse macro-health outcomes? How formed is their brain? Will they be someone who is productive to society or someone who drains society for decades, perhaps in jail?

The question is where is the money for this “investment” coming from?
I can’t believe I actually had to explain that.

Dp- are you aware that the federal government collects taxes?

So when the reporter asked her how she was going to fund her plan, why didn’t she say “with taxes”?