NYC mayor declares 'emergency' due to migrants

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, because the Mayor can’t handle the influx of illegal immigrants, he’s now imposing and putting the responsibility on churches and private citizens to set up and take care of illegal immigrants?

The Constitution says you can’t be forced to house government soldiers. Doesn’t say they can’t make you house illegal aliens. Here it comes.

It really shouldn’t be that hard. Step one would be identifying owners who have misused property. Step two would be performing background checks on this owners to ensure the migrants are not housed in a potentially unsafe environment. Step three would be assigning migrant families to the appropriate home - close to strong schools, services, transportation, and retail. Finally, the city should provide some sort of monetary stipend to owners of selected underutilized properties to cover the cost of feeding the migrants, laundering, transporting them, assisting with migrant child care if needed, etc.

This all makes sense, is quite doable, and is an equitable solution; exactly what a responsible government should be doing.

So as per AOC we're supposed to present anyone with work documents, benefits, and a path to citizenship. https://www.instagram.com/p/C1rzzt_gpSf/

Then we're supposed to "adopt" a migrant or a family of migrants and get a small payment from the feds to feed, house, do their laundry, provide transportation, and childcare. What am I? Their parent or grandparent? This is not what a respnsible government does. So urban housing in the USSR - govt decided who lived where and now you people think just like that. Govt controlled residency in private housing whether owned or rented. https://kommunalka.colgate.edu/cfm/essays.cfm?ClipID=376

There’s a lot of homes with empty nesters that can be used for the purpose of housing migrants. Unused bedrooms can house three to four people. As for assistance with adjusting, providing nutritious meals, transportation, and cleaning I think given most Americans’ humble immigrant beginnings, it would be an honor to help the newest Americans.
Remember this would only be a temporary set of measures until the migrants received work permits and found suitable homes.

Empty nesters are not AirBnB hosts.

Don't worry, the PP is an unhinged troll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The difference in coverage between the New York Post and the New York Daily News on this issue is remarkable. NYP discusses the impact on students, DN ignores the issue and talks about 60 day evictions for migrants.

The NY Daily News article focused almost exclusively on the impact this has on the migrants - those here illegally.
https://www.nydailynews.com/2024/01/09/city-hall-orders-migrants-at-floyd-bennett-to-be-evacuated-to-brooklyn-high-school/

Same with the NY Times.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/09/nyregion/migrant-families-floyd-bennett-tent-evacuation-rain.html

Amazing, really. The citizens who live in the city and pay exorbitant taxes that pay for education and are forced to educate children remotely are ignored by these publications.

DP. Why are New York residents not outraged about this? Not just the one mother in the video clip - but ALL parents? How can this be happening and seemingly no one is batting an eye?

The original headline yesterday of the NYT article was “JM high school shelters migrants and prompts right-wing outrage”.

There are plenty of reports of outraged parents just search Brooklyn school or that + fume or outrage. They weren’t even offering remote teaching - just learn on your own at home and request zoom if needed.

I used to love the NYT. Now they serve the wealthy only. I notice those migrants didnt go to the UES or private schools

+1
Now THAT would have been something. Seems the liberal powers that be are actually bullies, taking advantage of the lower income communities because they can.

[Anonymous]

You're not being tolerant.
You're not being inclusive.
You're not being open-minded.
You're being conquered.

[Anonymous]

Don’t watch this if kids are around.

[Anonymous]

LOL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don’t watch this if kids are around.

Oh I LMMFAO. She said "Joe and the ho has gots to go"! So BEAUTIFUL!! So TRUE!!

If Jill is a "ho", then that would make Melania a super "ho" since she is the one who took off her clothes to make a buck, and also to get into the country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don’t watch this if kids are around.

Oh I LMMFAO. She said "Joe and the ho has gots to go"! So BEAUTIFUL!! So TRUE!!

If Jill is a "ho", then that would make Melania a super "ho" since she is the one who took off her clothes to make a buck, and also to get into the country.

I think he was referring to Kamala. And, given her past history........

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sooo, how’s that sanctuary city status going?

They are in NYC for "Right to Shelter", not sanctuary city. You don't even know what the issue is.

Don’t stop believing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, because the Mayor can’t handle the influx of illegal immigrants, he’s now imposing and putting the responsibility on churches and private citizens to set up and take care of illegal immigrants?

The Constitution says you can’t be forced to house government soldiers. Doesn’t say they can’t make you house illegal aliens. Here it comes.

It really shouldn’t be that hard. Step one would be identifying owners who have misused property. Step two would be performing background checks on this owners to ensure the migrants are not housed in a potentially unsafe environment. Step three would be assigning migrant families to the appropriate home - close to strong schools, services, transportation, and retail. Finally, the city should provide some sort of monetary stipend to owners of selected underutilized properties to cover the cost of feeding the migrants, laundering, transporting them, assisting with migrant child care if needed, etc.

This all makes sense, is quite doable, and is an equitable solution; exactly what a responsible government should be doing.

So as per AOC we're supposed to present anyone with work documents, benefits, and a path to citizenship. https://www.instagram.com/p/C1rzzt_gpSf/

Then we're supposed to "adopt" a migrant or a family of migrants and get a small payment from the feds to feed, house, do their laundry, provide transportation, and childcare. What am I? Their parent or grandparent? This is not what a respnsible government does. So urban housing in the USSR - govt decided who lived where and now you people think just like that. Govt controlled residency in private housing whether owned or rented. https://kommunalka.colgate.edu/cfm/essays.cfm?ClipID=376

There’s a lot of homes with empty nesters that can be used for the purpose of housing migrants. Unused bedrooms can house three to four people. As for assistance with adjusting, providing nutritious meals, transportation, and cleaning I think given most Americans’ humble immigrant beginnings, it would be an honor to help the newest Americans.
Remember this would only be a temporary set of measures until the migrants received work permits and found suitable homes.

Massachusetts is counting on that.

".... hosting an immigrant for short-term shelter as they begin their journey toward independence......"

(note that "immigrant" is singular, but the pronoun "they" is plural)

Hope the media covers this meeting.

[Anonymous]

And, then there is Maine....

Citation: https://foxbaltimore.com/news/nation-world/maine-begins-paying-rent-for-homeless-migrants-portland-brunswick-augusta-new-england-migrant-southern-border-crisis-biden-trump-illegal-immigrants-asylum-seekers

[Anonymous]

So far this illegal immigrant has received seven months of hotel accommodations and three meals a day in NYC:

Probably comes to at least $70,000.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So far this illegal immigrant has received seven months of hotel accommodations and three meals a day in NYC:

Probably comes to at least $70,000.

Amazing

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The difference in coverage between the New York Post and the New York Daily News on this issue is remarkable. NYP discusses the impact on students, DN ignores the issue and talks about 60 day evictions for migrants.

The NY Daily News article focused almost exclusively on the impact this has on the migrants - those here illegally.
https://www.nydailynews.com/2024/01/09/city-hall-orders-migrants-at-floyd-bennett-to-be-evacuated-to-brooklyn-high-school/

Same with the NY Times.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/09/nyregion/migrant-families-floyd-bennett-tent-evacuation-rain.html

Amazing, really. The citizens who live in the city and pay exorbitant taxes that pay for education and are forced to educate children remotely are ignored by these publications.

DP. Why are New York residents not outraged about this? Not just the one mother in the video clip - but ALL parents? How can this be happening and seemingly no one is batting an eye?

If it’s not reported on CNN, MSNBC, PBS, etc, it didn’t happen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So far this illegal immigrant has received seven months of hotel accommodations and three meals a day in NYC:

Probably comes to at least $70,000.

Amazing

Hey, it’s just money!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don’t watch this if kids are around.

Oh I LMMFAO. She said "Joe and the ho has gots to go"! So BEAUTIFUL!! So TRUE!!

+1
Imagine if a white person had said all of this. She is spot on.