How likely for save act to pass senate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Part of Trump's cognitive decline is that he's more likely to blurt out the actual truth from time to time.

I understand where Trump's coming from here. In his mind real, patriotic Americans hate Democratic policies so Dems only win elections by cheating. So a law that stops their cheating will make sure only real, patriotic Americans get to have their voices heard at the polls. He's not necessarily being corrupt...just really stupid.

Then how did Trump win in 2024?

He won because people were unhappy about how the Biden administration handled the border and Israel/Gaza.

But if there were election fraud, then Harris would have won in a landslide and also controlled the House and Senate. No, the only fraud for the GOP is the election where Trump lost the presidency in 2020, but somehow a lot of GOP House and Senate candidates were elected.

There clearly wasn't fraud in 2024, since trump won and the GOP controls the House and senate, so what is Trump trying to fix? Other than the 2026 and 2028 elections?

Bottom line, there is no election fraud at scale that turns the results of the elections. It is all a scam to rig 2026 and 2028.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Part of Trump's cognitive decline is that he's more likely to blurt out the actual truth from time to time.

I understand where Trump's coming from here. In his mind real, patriotic Americans hate Democratic policies so Dems only win elections by cheating. So a law that stops their cheating will make sure only real, patriotic Americans get to have their voices heard at the polls. He's not necessarily being corrupt...just really stupid.

Then how did Trump win in 2024?

He won because people were unhappy about how the Biden administration handled the border and Israel/Gaza.

That's not really the question. If according to Trump there is massive voter fraud, how did he win in 2024? Because the same machinery that didn't let him win in 2020 would have prevented him from winning in 2024, right? How does he reconcile the discrepancy (rhetorical)?

And how did he win in 2017?

And how do down ticket Republicans ever win if there's massive fraud?

Bottom line: there's only "fraud" when he loses or is afraid he might lose.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Part of Trump's cognitive decline is that he's more likely to blurt out the actual truth from time to time.

I understand where Trump's coming from here. In his mind real, patriotic Americans hate Democratic policies so Dems only win elections by cheating. So a law that stops their cheating will make sure only real, patriotic Americans get to have their voices heard at the polls. He's not necessarily being corrupt...just really stupid.

Then how did Trump win in 2024?

He won because people were unhappy about how the Biden administration handled the border and Israel/Gaza.

But if there were election fraud, then Harris would have won in a landslide and also controlled the House and Senate. No, the only fraud for the GOP is the election where Trump lost the presidency in 2020, but somehow a lot of GOP House and Senate candidates were elected.

There clearly wasn't fraud in 2024, since trump won and the GOP controls the House and senate, so what is Trump trying to fix? Other than the 2026 and 2028 elections?

Bottom line, there is no election fraud at scale that turns the results of the elections. It is all a scam to rig 2026 and 2028.

Ever consider that Harris would have lost even worse than she did?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Part of Trump's cognitive decline is that he's more likely to blurt out the actual truth from time to time.

I understand where Trump's coming from here. In his mind real, patriotic Americans hate Democratic policies so Dems only win elections by cheating. So a law that stops their cheating will make sure only real, patriotic Americans get to have their voices heard at the polls. He's not necessarily being corrupt...just really stupid.

Then how did Trump win in 2024?

He won because people were unhappy about how the Biden administration handled the border and Israel/Gaza.

But if there were election fraud, then Harris would have won in a landslide and also controlled the House and Senate. No, the only fraud for the GOP is the election where Trump lost the presidency in 2020, but somehow a lot of GOP House and Senate candidates were elected.

There clearly wasn't fraud in 2024, since trump won and the GOP controls the House and senate, so what is Trump trying to fix? Other than the 2026 and 2028 elections?

Bottom line, there is no election fraud at scale that turns the results of the elections. It is all a scam to rig 2026 and 2028.

Ever consider that Harris would have lost even worse than she did?

This has got to be sarcasm!? She lost. That’s all that matters.

[Anonymous]

That thing that never happens just happened again.

[Anonymous]

Immigrants have reduced the US budget deficits by $14.5 trillion over the last 30 years. Tune in now to watch Cato’s Director of Immigration Studies, David J. Bier, testify at the Senate Budget Committee hearing, “Sanctuary Cities: The Cost of Undermining Law and Order.”

Watch: https://ow.ly/S0kX50YrSn0
Read the testimony: https://ow.ly/8Fst50YrSmR

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Part of Trump's cognitive decline is that he's more likely to blurt out the actual truth from time to time.

I understand where Trump's coming from here. In his mind real, patriotic Americans hate Democratic policies so Dems only win elections by cheating. So a law that stops their cheating will make sure only real, patriotic Americans get to have their voices heard at the polls. He's not necessarily being corrupt...just really stupid.

Then how did Trump win in 2024?

He won because people were unhappy about how the Biden administration handled the border and Israel/Gaza.

That's not really the question. If according to Trump there is massive voter fraud, how did he win in 2024? Because the same machinery that didn't let him win in 2020 would have prevented him from winning in 2024, right? How does he reconcile the discrepancy (rhetorical)?

And how did he win in 2017?

And how do down ticket Republicans ever win if there's massive fraud?

Bottom line: there's only "fraud" when he loses or is afraid he might lose.

Of course, this legislation is an election cheating scam.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Immigrants have reduced the US budget deficits by $14.5 trillion over the last 30 years. Tune in now to watch Cato’s Director of Immigration Studies, David J. Bier, testify at the Senate Budget Committee hearing, “Sanctuary Cities: The Cost of Undermining Law and Order.”

Watch: https://ow.ly/S0kX50YrSn0
Read the testimony: https://ow.ly/8Fst50YrSmR

David Bier is a joke and an open borders advocate.

[Anonymous]

How bad must it be if all of the Senate Republicans won’t even get behind it?

[Anonymous]

UPDATE: the senate is voting on the SAVE America Act next week.

This is NOT a simple voter ID law. it's a full restructuring of how Americans register to vote.

breakdown from your Legalmiga®:

to register to vote, you'd need to show up in person with:
📄 passport
📄 birth certificate + photo ID
📄 naturalization papers

REAL IDs? ❌
military IDs? ❌
online, mail, and DMV registration? all gone.

140 million Americans don't have a passport.

up to 69 million women have name mismatches on their birth certificates.

in some rural counties, getting to an election office is a 7–8 hour round trip.

utah reviewed 2.1 million voter registrations looking for noncitizens.

they found ZERO confirmed cases of noncitizen voting.

zero. the bill's own senate sponsor, Mike Lee, is from Utah.

his state's data blows up the entire premise of this bill.

here's what's actually happening in the senate right now:

to pass a bill, you need 60 votes.
republicans only have 53. democrats won't budge.

trump and MAGA wanted a "talking filibuster" ... force democrats to stand on the floor and talk nonstop to block it. idea is they'd run out of steam.

Thune said no. not enough support, could tie up the senate for months, no guarantee it works.

straight 60-vote threshold next week...it is expected to fail.

so what problem is this actually solving?

none.

here's my lawyer take: this bill would disenfranchise millions, overwhelm election offices, and punish eligible voters (especially women, working-class folks, and rural Americans) while fixing a problem that data shows doesn't exist.

call your senators now. the vote is next week.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Immigrants have reduced the US budget deficits by $14.5 trillion over the last 30 years. Tune in now to watch Cato’s Director of Immigration Studies, David J. Bier, testify at the Senate Budget Committee hearing, “Sanctuary Cities: The Cost of Undermining Law and Order.”

Watch: https://ow.ly/S0kX50YrSn0
Read the testimony: https://ow.ly/8Fst50YrSmR

David Bier is a joke and an open borders advocate.

Counterpoint: you are a joke.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Immigrants have reduced the US budget deficits by $14.5 trillion over the last 30 years. Tune in now to watch Cato’s Director of Immigration Studies, David J. Bier, testify at the Senate Budget Committee hearing, “Sanctuary Cities: The Cost of Undermining Law and Order.”

Watch: https://ow.ly/S0kX50YrSn0
Read the testimony: https://ow.ly/8Fst50YrSmR

David Bier is a joke and an open borders advocate.

Actually, to add, that lady is an idiot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Immigrants have reduced the US budget deficits by $14.5 trillion over the last 30 years. Tune in now to watch Cato’s Director of Immigration Studies, David J. Bier, testify at the Senate Budget Committee hearing, “Sanctuary Cities: The Cost of Undermining Law and Order.”

Watch: https://ow.ly/S0kX50YrSn0
Read the testimony: https://ow.ly/8Fst50YrSmR

Propaganda from big business that wants to exploit workers

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Immigrants have reduced the US budget deficits by $14.5 trillion over the last 30 years. Tune in now to watch Cato’s Director of Immigration Studies, David J. Bier, testify at the Senate Budget Committee hearing, “Sanctuary Cities: The Cost of Undermining Law and Order.”

Watch: https://ow.ly/S0kX50YrSn0
Read the testimony: https://ow.ly/8Fst50YrSmR

Propaganda from big business that wants to exploit workers

Why should we believe you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:UPDATE: the senate is voting on the SAVE America Act next week.

This is NOT a simple voter ID law. it's a full restructuring of how Americans register to vote.

breakdown from your Legalmiga®:

to register to vote, you'd need to show up in person with:
📄 passport
📄 birth certificate + photo ID
📄 naturalization papers

REAL IDs? ❌
military IDs? ❌
online, mail, and DMV registration? all gone.

140 million Americans don't have a passport.

up to 69 million women have name mismatches on their birth certificates.

in some rural counties, getting to an election office is a 7–8 hour round trip.

utah reviewed 2.1 million voter registrations looking for noncitizens.

they found ZERO confirmed cases of noncitizen voting.

zero. the bill's own senate sponsor, Mike Lee, is from Utah.

his state's data blows up the entire premise of this bill.

here's what's actually happening in the senate right now:

to pass a bill, you need 60 votes.
republicans only have 53. democrats won't budge.

trump and MAGA wanted a "talking filibuster" ... force democrats to stand on the floor and talk nonstop to block it. idea is they'd run out of steam.

Thune said no. not enough support, could tie up the senate for months, no guarantee it works.

straight 60-vote threshold next week...it is expected to fail.

so what problem is this actually solving?

none.

here's my lawyer take: this bill would disenfranchise millions, overwhelm election offices, and punish eligible voters (especially women, working-class folks, and rural Americans) while fixing a problem that data shows doesn't exist.

call your senators now. the vote is next week.

For a “talking filibuster” does one senator have to do it? Or can they pass the baton?