
There is a difference between choosing to do this on your own before or while you pursue a craft, but, being asked to do a job outside the scope of your employment by your institution because they know you're desperate for money is something different. If WB is raising money, then I certainly hope they are paying all their dancers to dance, not to bar tend for the rich folks. It's like asking someone to serve coffee at the meeting. I didn't watch, but, really, they needed a bartender for a virtual fundraiser? |
I didn't see it that way at all. It was fun to get to know a dancer and see him do something else, also somewhat glamorous. And it's not like he was toiling away making a hundred cocktails. He was playing a part for the gala, making a couple of cocktails. |
Serving ladies who lunch is not glamorous. The dancer would probably never say this out loud but doubtless was not happy with the “role.” |
|
She is a total treasure. Everything she does is equal parts offensive and delightful. |
It's like if Ivanka Trump were fun. And thin. |
Since this is technically the health forum ... important factoid I just learned recently: People who cough or sneeze produce heavy virus-laden droplets that fall quickly to the ground. Infected people who are NOT coughing and sneezing release lighter virus-laden aerosols when they breathe and talk, and those lighter particles can float in the air for much longer for others to breathe in. Researchers at least suspect that this is how asymptotic or only mildly symptomatic people can be super-spreaders. You can’t rely on coughing (your own or others’) as the measure of whether someone is spreading virus. [/end PSA] |
Wow—I just saw this stunningly off-base article from 7/13 which focuses on how the Ballet “somehow” messed up. https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/theater_dance/the-washington-ballet-thought-a-virtual-fundraiser-was-safe-but-it-still-may-have-put-artists-at-risk/2020/07/13/a70bf050-c2da-11ea-b4f6-cb39cd8940fb_story.html It says that Ashley “got sick the day after the party” and notes that Julie Kent wasn’t at Ashley’s dinner party. Like they (Including the journalist) are all scratching their heads to understand how this happened. The author is significantly in error. Ashley may have tested positive right after the party, but OBVIOUSLY she was already sick at that time, and she was obviously already sick at the time of the gala. They are really trying to sweep her inexcusable actions under the rug. Journalist included. |
I don't defend her at all. I think what she did was horrible. However, its not obvious she was sick at the party. Pre-symptomatic transmission isn't just possible, but some speculate you are MOST contagious in the days before you have symptoms. |
But she'd already been tested BEFORE the party! She knew she was sick and knew that it was probably the corona. |
Don’t you mean they should be sued for negligence by all the other people they may have been in contact with after the party? They made the choice to attend an illegal gathering and then put anyone else the encountered (children, grocery store workers, co-workers, childcare providers, etc) at risk because of their irresponsible choices. |
This is incorrect. The party was Thursday, she tested Friday and got the results Monday. |
"I take a bite of cereal. Nope, still can’t smell or taste. Ugh. I immediately report this aloud, rubbing it in by saying if I can’t taste a cocktail on my birthday I’ll be devastated". She is completely insufferable, trust me. What's funny is that she's deluded herself into thinking that she's been accepted and is a part of the "in crowd", but what she doesn't realize is that she's only ever been seen as the hired help and that's all they'll ever see her as. |
Why? She didn't know she had it. This is the risk you take when you attend something like this. I think throwing the party was dumb, but anyone who attended who hasn't been living under a rock understood the risks. |
What seems clear to me is that the "in crowd" is only "into themselves". This town is insufferable. |