Even if it were true that the missile was damaged by Patriot missiles and the collateral damage was done that way (which it isn't) then you are still removing the core blame, which is a Russian missile aimed at a chlldren's hospital. |
|
|
Russian trolls posting Lord Bebo and fake Russian propaganda certainly explains all of the other pro-Trump garbage on this site today. |
Russians targeted a childrens hospital. Russians are disgraceful baby killers. |
The X-101 has large glide wings, not the tiny triangle wings pictured here. The proportions are all wrong as well, since the X-101 should be "fatter." And look, the NATO summit starts tomorrow, where Ukraine will come begging for more AD systems. And "Russia" conveniently attacks a civilian target in a way that doesn't really inflict much damage, but generates maximum outrage. And all the shills who had been quiet for weeks get activated to amplify the approved message. This is neo-con 101 for people that didn't pay attention in prior wars. |
|
Lie. It's a perfect match to a KH-101. |
Another image of a KH-101 being launched by a Tupolev
Matches the one in the video exactly, proportions, protruding turbojet intake near the rear (Patriot missiles do not have this), diameter, wing location - everything. The missile that hit the hospital was a KH-101 |
Zelensky takes his orders from NATO, btw. |
|
Zelensky was a comedian and actor before he was installed as president. Zero experience. Imagine that. |
^ Look at this dumb ass who thinks Zelensky has no motivation of his own whatsoever and is just marching to the beat of whatever NATO says, AS IF his country weren't being attacked and invaded and his people being killed and his hospitals being bombed and children being kidnapped and everything else. Takes a special level of ignorance to say something like that. But here you are. Take a bow. |
| It's wild that they are trying to claim that a missile that clearly has a turbofan nacelle visible near its tail (hallmark of cruise missiles) is a "patriot missile" which has a solid fuel rocket motor and does not have any such turbofan nacelle. Complete apples and oranges. But I guess the russian trolls think that gullible idiots will buy their lies. |
| Hey it’s Monday. Did Ukraine defeat the opponent with millions more men yet? |
Your image doesn't have those little triangle fins in the midsection from the video. It also has a long dark bar where the glide wings are, which the video missile also lacks. Its also a "fatter" missile. Lastly the X-101 tends to carry an 800 KG (roughly 2,000 pounds of freedom) warhead, which would have done far more damage to the hospital. |