Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:They’re in an odd situation. We don’t have royalty here. Their roles are now undefined, and we’re in the midst of a pandemic.

Meghan has an enormous and built-in platform in the UK that gave her free reign to pursue whatever projects she wished, like that cookbook which was very successful. But she was only in the UK for a short time and didn’t have the opportunity to establish herself, her role and her repertoire of good works, and that makes it awkward for her in the US, where she is primarily known as the actress who married a prince.

So if they volunteer for a soup kitchen, or whatever random appearances they’ve been doing, it just doesn’t carry the same weight or have much meaning. They’re now kind of undistinguishable from other uber-famous celebrities in LA.

That’s why it seems odd that an icon like Gloria Steinem would be giving her an audience. But Meghan does have s compelling story, and she remains strongly committed to her causes. It’s going to be challenge, though, for them to find their place here in the US.



Meghan and Gloria have THE SAME PR FIRM -- Sunshine Sachs. It's not complicated understanding that this is a complete "bone" to throw to Meghan to help jumpstart their failed USA launch.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Not a good look -- waiting for a $2 million payout for photos of Archie:

https://blindgossip.com/baby-needs-to-start-earning/#more-101135


Baby needs to start earning! LOL


"While this actress continues to put herself in the headlines on a regular basis, have you noticed that something has been missing for the past few months?

Her baby.

While she continuously pleads for privacy and talks about safety… it turns out those are not the primary reasons you haven’t seen her and her husband’s child!

She believes that any appearance of the baby has significant value. She has been trying for months to strike a deal for a cover story for $2M+, but nobody has been wiling to pay that.

This is very frustrating for them. It used to be the family disapproval that stopped them from using the baby to make money, but that is not the problem any more. Now it’s the economy.

It’s so sad that no one will pay them what they want. What they want, they should get!

If she can’t get that deal done, she will find another use for the baby. One thought is a new photo/video to draw millions of followers when they launch their new social media site. Another is to do a staged appearance in conjunction with one of their projects.

Which project? Who knows! Actress and Hubby have been jumping on and off so many bandwagons over the past few months that it’s getting a little hard to keep track of it all.

Their original plans went out the window, so at this point it’s just a series of weirdly random appearances accompanied by a lot of word salad.

In any case, $2M is a big ask.

Perhaps they are justifying that price by saying it will be donated to charity?

Perhaps to one of their own “charities”?"


Disgusting, but I wouldn’t put it past her. What’s happened to Harry? I can’t believe he’s go along with pimping out Archie like this.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Citizenship rule chat is boring, back to HM gossip and analysis please


You call and I answer. Here's Jane Moir with some analysis for you:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-8671981/JAN-MOIR-Meghan-speak-guide-woke-folk.html

...This week, Megan climbed into a pair of £200 trousers teamed with £500 vegan leather sandals and topped off with a £300 straw sun hat to usher 86-year-old feminist icon Gloria Steinem into a deckchair and have a simple ol' 'backyard chat'.

Honestly, it would take a heart of stone not to scream with laughter at the pretentiousness.

Gloria has been a champion of women's rights since the days when women didn't have any. Since the early Sixties, she has never stopped writing and campaigning for her core causes: birth control, equal pay, an end to violence against women, civil rights and social justice.

Meanwhile, Meghan once wrote messages on bananas to sex workers, urging them to cheer up.

They met under the auspices of Makers Women, a women's empowerment platform, which streamed the meeting around the world. Object of the exercise? To encourage women to vote in the forthcoming presidential elections. Unspoken message? So long as they don't vote for Trump.

Here is my guide to the real meaning behind the words of this epic feminist summit.

1. 'I'm so glad that you're home!' says Gloria, to which Meghan replies: 'Me too. For so many reasons.'

WHAT SHE MEANS: Uh oh! This was a sly reference to the drudgery and cruelty that Cinder-Meghan-ella endured back in the evil UK, where there was a problem with a tiara and Kate once didn't give her a lift to the shops.

2. Gloria gives Meghan a bracelet embossed with the words 'Linked not ranked'. Meghan, who utterly hated being in the second rank of the Royal Family, is thrilled.

MEGHAN SAYS: It means everything to me on every level; we are linked, not ranked.

WHAT SHE MEANS: No, I didn't object when people curtsied to me in the UK. Nor when I get special services and VIP treatment in Soho House because of who I am.

Nor when my rank as a royal wife gives me access to people like you, Gloria, and to Oprah, Ellen, George, Amal and everyone else who ignored me when I was on Suits but knock on my door now.

No one has benefited more from rank than me, but it suits me now to pretend I got here on merit.

3. MEGHAN SAYS: I firmly believe that we vote to honour those who came before us and to protect those who come after us. Ms Steinem, my friend Gloria, is one of the women I honour when I vote.

WHAT SHE MEANS: I've known this old doll for about five minutes but she might be useful.

4. MEGHAN SAYS: As many of us believe, you can only be what you can see. And in the absence of that, how can you aspire to something greater than what you see in your own world? I think maybe now we're starting to break through in a different way.

WHAT SHE MEANS: Be what you see, be a bee who wants to be a bigger bee. Don't be a beekeeper, be a bee-seeker. Don't bumble bee, be free.

5. MEGHAN SAYS: My husband is a feminist, too.

WHAT SHE MEANS: Dimbo dude does what I tell him.

6. MEGHAN SAYS: There's no shame in being someone who advocates for fundamental human rights for everyone, which of course includes women.

WHAT SHE MEANS: There is no shame and never has been. I just said 'shame' to make it look like I was doing something brave and daring.

7. MEGHAN SAYS: Hi, honey. Come here.

WHAT SHE MEANS: I meant the dog, Harry, not you. Go back inside.

8. MEGHAN SAYS: As I've gotten older I've been able to understand that it's not mutually exclusive to be a feminist and be feminine. And to own that and harness your femininity and your identification as a woman in all of the different layers.

WHAT SHE MEANS: Has anyone seen my balcony bra?

To be continued...


This is hilarious!!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They’re in an odd situation. We don’t have royalty here. Their roles are now undefined, and we’re in the midst of a pandemic.

Meghan has an enormous and built-in platform in the UK that gave her free reign to pursue whatever projects she wished, like that cookbook which was very successful. But she was only in the UK for a short time and didn’t have the opportunity to establish herself, her role and her repertoire of good works, and that makes it awkward for her in the US, where she is primarily known as the actress who married a prince.

So if they volunteer for a soup kitchen, or whatever random appearances they’ve been doing, it just doesn’t carry the same weight or have much meaning. They’re now kind of undistinguishable from other uber-famous celebrities in LA.

That’s why it seems odd that an icon like Gloria Steinem would be giving her an audience. But Meghan does have s compelling story, and she remains strongly committed to her causes. It’s going to be challenge, though, for them to find their place here in the US.


Ugh, I meant free rein!! Not reign


And I also meant *indistinguishable*
Anonymous
Meghan and Harry biggest problem in the US is that most people don’t get what they are complaining about. They lived lives of extreme luxury and privilege before they opted out. They still have wealth and access beyond most Americans. Their son will never want for anything. We’re in a pandemic where people have lost their lives, jobs, businesses, access to education and healthcare, and they are whining about how badly they had it? Sorry, we’re not buying it.
Anonymous
You guys don’t get tired of hating people you don’t know?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:You guys don’t get tired of hating people you don’t know?


Don’t care about them enough to hate them.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You guys don’t get tired of hating people you don’t know?


Don’t care about them enough to hate them.


52 pages in
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:You guys don’t get tired of hating people you don’t know?

Meghan, is that you?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not a good look -- waiting for a $2 million payout for photos of Archie:

https://blindgossip.com/baby-needs-to-start-earning/#more-101135


Baby needs to start earning! LOL


"While this actress continues to put herself in the headlines on a regular basis, have you noticed that something has been missing for the past few months?

Her baby.

While she continuously pleads for privacy and talks about safety… it turns out those are not the primary reasons you haven’t seen her and her husband’s child!

She believes that any appearance of the baby has significant value. She has been trying for months to strike a deal for a cover story for $2M+, but nobody has been wiling to pay that.

This is very frustrating for them. It used to be the family disapproval that stopped them from using the baby to make money, but that is not the problem any more. Now it’s the economy.

It’s so sad that no one will pay them what they want. What they want, they should get!

If she can’t get that deal done, she will find another use for the baby. One thought is a new photo/video to draw millions of followers when they launch their new social media site. Another is to do a staged appearance in conjunction with one of their projects.

Which project? Who knows! Actress and Hubby have been jumping on and off so many bandwagons over the past few months that it’s getting a little hard to keep track of it all.

Their original plans went out the window, so at this point it’s just a series of weirdly random appearances accompanied by a lot of word salad.

In any case, $2M is a big ask.

Perhaps they are justifying that price by saying it will be donated to charity?

Perhaps to one of their own “charities”?"


Disgusting, but I wouldn’t put it past her. What’s happened to Harry? I can’t believe he’s go along with pimping out Archie like this.


Blind gossip sites are super fake sadly. You can’t trust any source of “gossip” that can produce such a large volume of unflattering stories every day without either paying or blackmailing their sources (like tmz does). You might be able to find some scraps of celeb gossip on lipstick alley or datalounge or occasionally reddit. But the actual blind gossip sites like this one and CDAN are full of things you can write yourself.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You guys don’t get tired of hating people you don’t know?

Meghan, is that you?

DP. This same tired response every time...
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They’re in an odd situation. We don’t have royalty here. Their roles are now undefined, and we’re in the midst of a pandemic.

Meghan has an enormous and built-in platform in the UK that gave her free reign to pursue whatever projects she wished, like that cookbook which was very successful. But she was only in the UK for a short time and didn’t have the opportunity to establish herself, her role and her repertoire of good works, and that makes it awkward for her in the US, where she is primarily known as the actress who married a prince.

So if they volunteer for a soup kitchen, or whatever random appearances they’ve been doing, it just doesn’t carry the same weight or have much meaning. They’re now kind of undistinguishable from other uber-famous celebrities in LA.

That’s why it seems odd that an icon like Gloria Steinem would be giving her an audience. But Meghan does have s compelling story, and she remains strongly committed to her causes. It’s going to be challenge, though, for them to find their place here in the US.



Meghan and Gloria have THE SAME PR FIRM -- Sunshine Sachs. It's not complicated understanding that this is a complete "bone" to throw to Meghan to help jumpstart their failed USA launch.


That makes sense. I don’t have strong feelings either way about Meghan but I wonder what her PR firm wants her brand to be- activism? In that case I guess Gloria Steinem is a good person to interview. But if she wants to do lifestyle brand stuff like Martha Stewart or Gwyneth I don’t think that branding is coming across clearly. At least not to me. I think they need to reinvent themselves a bit because the average American doesn’t give two cents that they were royal.
Anonymous
Not only did Meghan and Harey step back while the iron was hot, but they stirred a lot of negative coverage before settling into this ill-defined branding.

They really need to go raise their family and take break for a few years. Someone who tells her to keep pushing the point of visibility is not doing her a favor. Then again, the Kardashians keep themselves in some media circles so who knows.
Anonymous
No one in the US is paying Harry and Meghan any attention. They are more relevant in the UK than in the US.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Meghan and Harry biggest problem in the US is that most people don’t get what they are complaining about. They lived lives of extreme luxury and privilege before they opted out. They still have wealth and access beyond most Americans. Their son will never want for anything. We’re in a pandemic where people have lost their lives, jobs, businesses, access to education and healthcare, and they are whining about how badly they had it? Sorry, we’re not buying it.


And, that’s what makes them boring and irrelevant.
Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: