Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More evidence of bad behavior by Kavanaugh...

In the days leading up to a public allegation that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh exposed himself to a college classmate, the judge and his team were communicating behind the scenes with friends to refute the claim, according to text messages obtained by NBC News.

Kerry Berchem, who was at Yale with both Kavanaugh and his accuser, Deborah Ramirez, has tried to get those messages to the FBI for its newly reopened investigation into the matter but says she has yet to be contacted by the bureau.

WOW! Shocking! Kavanaugh and his team were trying to get out in front of what they believed were false rumors being circulated by Deborah Ramirez amongst mutual friends of his and Ramirez. I'm trying to find the evidence of bad behavior. Was he/his team directing people to lie to congressional investigators?

He said under oath that he didn't talk to anyone about the event Ramirez described before it went public. See a few pages back

You're going to have to point me to that quote because his testimony was as follows:

Questioner: All right. My last question on this subject is since you graduated from college, but before the New Yorker article publication on September 23rd, have you ever discussed or heard discussion about the incident matching the description given by Ms. Ramirez to the New Yorker?

Judge Kavanaugh: No.

And

Questioner: Well, actually, are you aware that the New York Times passed up on this story before the New Yorker ran the story? Judge Kavanaugh. That’s what I read in the New York Times. What’s your reaction to that?

Judge Kavanaugh: They couldn’t — the New York Times couldn’t corroborate this story and found that she was calling around to classmates trying to see if they remembered it. And I, at least — and I, myself, heard about that, that she was doing that. And you know, that just strikes me as, you know, what is going on here? When someone is calling around to try to refresh other people, is that what’s going on? What’s going on with that? That doesn’t sound — that doesn’t sound good to me. It doesn’t sound fair. It doesn’t sound proper. It sounds like an orchestrated hit to take me out. That’s what it sounds like.

So he contradicted himself on the stand.
And he admits that he knew she said it, which goes along with what a big law partner says -- he knew and was calling and texting people about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

So he contradicted himself on the stand.
And he admits that he knew she said it, which goes along with what a big law partner says -- he knew and was calling and texting people about it.

It's like some of you can't even read.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All this talk of the process being akin to a job interview are so ridiculous. Tell me about the job interviews you've had where half of the people who are interviewing you have publicly stated that there is zero chance that they will consider hiring you.

Imagine being Dr. Christine Blasey Ford and having Mitch McConnell and co say that Kavanaugh will be confirmed despite your allegations before you’ve had a chance to testify.

Since my point was refuting the constant chorus of claims that this is not a trial, it's a job interview, I'm not sure now with whom you agree.

[Anonymous]

Swetnik’s ex-boyfriend will be on Laura Ingraham tonight at 10:00.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All this talk of the process being akin to a job interview are so ridiculous. Tell me about the job interviews you've had where half of the people who are interviewing you have publicly stated that there is zero chance that they will consider hiring you.

Imagine being Dr. Christine Blasey Ford and having Mitch McConnell and co say that Kavanaugh will be confirmed despite your allegations before you’ve had a chance to testify.

Since my point was refuting the constant chorus of claims that this is not a trial, it's a job interview, I'm not sure now with whom you agree.

It's a very special type of job interview. It's not your regular job interview.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Swetnik’s ex-boyfriend will be on Laura Ingraham tonight at 10:00.

The crazy guy in Miami?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The next one on the list will be more conservative.
Karma.

If they have staked an anti-Roe claim, they won't pass Murkowski and Collins.

Hmmm... if the Republicans pick up more seats in Nov., we won’t need Murkowski and Collins.

Was that a joke?

They have no sense of reality so probably not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Swetnik’s ex-boyfriend will be on Laura Ingraham tonight at 10:00.

The one who filed the suit against her and lost? m'okay

[Anonymous]

John Oliver for the win. "Judge Animal House"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Swetnik’s ex-boyfriend will be on Laura Ingraham tonight at 10:00.

The one who filed the suit against her and lost? m'okay

The one who was applying for jobs online using her resume!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More evidence of bad behavior by Kavanaugh...

In the days leading up to a public allegation that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh exposed himself to a college classmate, the judge and his team were communicating behind the scenes with friends to refute the claim, according to text messages obtained by NBC News.

Kerry Berchem, who was at Yale with both Kavanaugh and his accuser, Deborah Ramirez, has tried to get those messages to the FBI for its newly reopened investigation into the matter but says she has yet to be contacted by the bureau.

WOW! Shocking! Kavanaugh and his team were trying to get out in front of what they believed were false rumors being circulated by Deborah Ramirez amongst mutual friends of his and Ramirez. I'm trying to find the evidence of bad behavior. Was he/his team directing people to lie to congressional investigators?

Look at the transcript. He said under oath that the first time he heard of the claim was when he saw it in the New Yorker article.

That was a lie.

I am beginning to sense a pattern.

He said that was the first time he heard the allegation of the incident described by Deborah Ramirez, but that he had heard Ramirez was calling around their mutual friends trying to refresh people's memories/dig up dirt. Read the excerpt above.

According to this NBC full story; Ramirez’ friends tried multiple times to send alleged text messages to FBI team. Texts from Kavanaugh’s buddies and possibly Kavanaugh to the group of people (in pic) to intervene on Ramirez accusations https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna915566

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:John Oliver for the win. "Judge Animal House"

LOL!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All this talk of the process being akin to a job interview are so ridiculous. Tell me about the job interviews you've had where half of the people who are interviewing you have publicly stated that there is zero chance that they will consider hiring you.

Maybe it has not been said publically--but I have absolutely been on interview panels where members have stated to each other that they have no intention of voting for a candidate for a variety of reasons. Your audience on this site is full of high level managers who are veterans of exactly that type of process.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More evidence of bad behavior by Kavanaugh...

In the days leading up to a public allegation that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh exposed himself to a college classmate, the judge and his team were communicating behind the scenes with friends to refute the claim, according to text messages obtained by NBC News.

Kerry Berchem, who was at Yale with both Kavanaugh and his accuser, Deborah Ramirez, has tried to get those messages to the FBI for its newly reopened investigation into the matter but says she has yet to be contacted by the bureau.

WOW! Shocking! Kavanaugh and his team were trying to get out in front of what they believed were false rumors being circulated by Deborah Ramirez amongst mutual friends of his and Ramirez. I'm trying to find the evidence of bad behavior. Was he/his team directing people to lie to congressional investigators?

Look at the transcript. He said under oath that the first time he heard of the claim was when he saw it in the New Yorker article.

That was a lie.

I am beginning to sense a pattern.

He said that was the first time he heard the allegation of the incident described by Deborah Ramirez, but that he had heard Ramirez was calling around their mutual friends trying to refresh people's memories/dig up dirt. Read the excerpt above.

According to this NBC full story; Ramirez’ friends tried multiple times to send alleged text messages to FBI team. Texts from Kavanaugh’s buddies and possibly Kavanaugh to the group of people (in pic) to intervene on Ramirez accusations https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna915566

he is done! He is so desperate and pathetic. Anything to not be held accountable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All this talk of the process being akin to a job interview are so ridiculous. Tell me about the job interviews you've had where half of the people who are interviewing you have publicly stated that there is zero chance that they will consider hiring you.

And no job interview I ever had asked asked my drinking in college. ESPECIALLY when I was 30 years past college.

Stop being disengenuous. The questions about drinking are to ascertain whether the accusations that he assaulted a 15 year old girl while drunk could be true. If he didn't drink at all, if no one had ever seen him get drunk or drink more than lightly, that would be one thing to refute Ford's testimony.

Though personally I will say, I would never hire someone if I knew they were a mean drunk. Have too many of those in my family and it's not fun, even if they aren't sexually assaulting you.