Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
It’s more than just hospitalizations. It’s about stopping the spread. These vaccines don’t do that. Hiding behind ineffective vaccines are why we are still in this mess. |
The great Covid denier. |
My concern is we are also dealing with waning immunity and the potential for reinfection. |
We are currently at 2.84% positivity rate. The MCPS rate is less than .1 percent. |
Hardly. I'm trying to be rational. So many people have suffered and died. I don't think you read my most carefully if you think I'm a covid denier. If the rate is below 3%, then I suppose lifting some restrictions might be okay. I'm still uneasy about schools. But we can take the attitude we've taken so far, where your kids go first. |
DP and I don't think you're a COVID denier, but I do think you're exaggerating the risks of COVID vs. other health outcomes, and specifically those risks to children. To claim that our bodies had "no" defenses against COVID-19 isn't correct; if that were true, everyone who contracted it would have died. This country in general, and MoCo/MCPS in particular, took a sledgehammer approach to COVID. After two years of that, we need more precision and nuance in our policies and in our messaging. You're not rational when you claim that people who want to consider ending mask mandates for children are Cato- and Koch-funded hounds. You're the one making it into theater. The fact is, we need to talk about what metrics we'd want to see, and what factors we're considering, in making masks optional in schools. That's not theatrics, it's reality. Public health cannot be solely about COVID prevention. |
The difference is that the vaccines have targeted the same, stable variants for decades. Not a virus that's had several major shifts in just a couple years. |
bingo. the human body has never been able to produce lasting immunity to the viruses that cause the commeon cold (rhino and corona viruses). It's why we get colds every year multiple times a year. and the same applies for vaccine effectiveness. |
Which means we have have to accept and live with COVID. |
We have accepted and live (or die) of Covid, but prevention goes a long way. You should try it. Masks and cleaning help with colds too. |
Why do you deliberately want to make people sick? |
My issue is that I understand that some folks are not ready to give up the mask mandate which is understandable given how bad things were in January but they should be at least willing to discuss what metrics they would consider lifting the mandate instead of accusing everyone else of being a Bannon/Koch troll or Literally Hitler. This kind of knee-jerk hysteria doesn't engender any kind of good-faith argument. I think that the decision should be driven by available data and not some hypothetical vaccine-resistant variant or some fantasy that covid will disapear. We can't deal with hypotheticals we can only make decisions based on the available information we have. |
PP you're quoting and, right, exactly. We need to have a mature conversation, taking into account the trade-offs of various approaches, and driven by science (to the extent that it can be). That the other PP responded to my post by asking why I want people to get sick only underscores the need for a rational approach. |
You have a horrible understanding of the situation -- it was about stopping the spread to reduce hospital burden. You speak of stopping the spread as though our plan was covid zero. It is and was not. |
How horrible things were in January? People got colds, many schools ran just fine, and the hospitals stayed under capacity. I saw tons of hysteria in January and high case rates, but that is not the issue we are trying to prevent. |