consistently earning 1.5 a year should put you in a position to do that if you choose to (unless you are also spending 1.5 a year) |
Maybe your kid wants to be a teacher, but you want them to be able to live in the neighborhood they grew up in (or something equivalent) and to be able to send their kids to the camps that they went to and the kind of vacations that your took them on and to the caliber of college that they went to. Most would argue that there is nothing wrong with being a teacher, but absent a trust fund or a rich spouse, that kid isn't providing the same lifestyle to your grandkids that you provided for them. Some people would like to give their kids enough so that the grandkids can enjoy those things |
|
Yes, usually if UMC parents want their kids to follow their bliss into less lucrative careers, they pay for their grandkids extracurriculars and private school or college tuition, as well as family vacations.
Source: I went to a private school with the grandkids. |
This. What happens is that maybe UMC parents can leave an educational trust for grandkids, so that children who take lower paying careers can still send their kids to good schools, but unless third generation steps it up career-wise, the money is gone by the time they finish school. |
|
This post is so amazingly stupid. You may have a medical degree, but your understanding of wealth is very flawed.
For one thing, UMC is a wide swath of people. I consider myself to be in that category but do not make nearly enough to enable my kids to live off of the money as adults. I also don’t believe that every job that’s profitable is punishing or that every job that’s not profitable is fulfilling. Your stark definitions fall into neat categories that don’t exist. You are clearly describing a particular situation of people you know, so if you want to know why they’re doing whatever it is they’re doing, you’d need to ask them. |
| Life is struggle. Anything else sounds boring at best, a pipe dream and trap at worst. Are there any people on DCUM living a life of leisure who think otherwise? |
You are spoiling them. They will do nothing with their lives. |
Sounds like you have no expectations or confidence in your kids. So they will probably end up in low paying or volunteering jobs. |
What kind of racist comment is this?! |
Maybe your kid wants a simpler life, but you want to be able to control them and their grandchildren. |
Can't believe you are a doctor with that logic |
Almost every offspring of DCUM folks is living a life of leisure. In college, every dime I made at any job I had went straight to my college tuition and housing. Spending money? For fun? No such thing. |
I actually have the same views after going to law school. Made no sense to me why rich families were sending their children to law school to grind out 80-90 hour weeks in law firms. I went to law school to break the cycle of poverty in my family, but I'm guiding my children to more lucrative, less hellish careers like business and finance. |
Hahaha. You think the hours are better in prestige finance positions? Like investment banking, top tier private equity firms, consulting firms (MBB) or hedge funds? Nope. I've done two of these and the hours for non-partner level folks are every bit as challenging. FWIW, my parents are physicians and had hellish hours. |
(NP) I think of my very noble PCP, getting paid six figures to write referrals and order bloodwork. give me a break. |