What is too old for short shorts?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Actually I really like these too and might order some :

https://www.wrangler.com/shop/womens-reworked-short-WBRWS.html?dwvar_WBRWS_color=WBRWSLS

Truck stop deep south $10 hooker, but don't let that stop ya'

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you don't care about the disconnect between your body in youthful clothes and the wrinkles, crepey skin, age spots, thinning/graying hair, then rock on. I would take an honest assessment of that factor in a full-length mirror. Go for the OVERALL assessment, and not just "my legs look good."

This is a little harsh, but I generally agree. Even if you look great, at a certain age it looks a little desperate walking around in coochie cutters. As I have gotten older, I've wanted to look a bit more sophisticated and put together (I am 35) so something like shredded denim hot pants isn't really part of that look no matter how great my legs look. Leave if for the young girls or the beach, if you must.

Wow. I bet the first woman commenting is more like 50+ and you agree with her at 35. Surely you don’t have gray hair and crepey skin and age spots at 35?

No, I don't have any of those things and am thin without cellulite, so I wear 3-4in shorts. I don't wear things like this and think there is definitely an age cutoff where it starts looking inappropriate.

You know nobody is talking about shorts like that when we say short shorts.

What are we talking about? I’m 50 and athletic and have a few pairs of 4 inch denim shorts from Madewell and Agolde. I like them for very casual outings.

What kind of casual outings? Nascar? 1998 Panama City Spring Break? Body shots at Buffalo Wild Wings?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think it depends on why you are wearing them.

Because they are comfortable for you and you are burning up and you don't care what other people think? Sure.

Because you think you look "hot"? No.

One of my friends thinks she looks good in shorts because she has a toned body, etc... but she is so thin that her skin is crepey and her face looks super old. Not a good look.

Yes, you keep posting this. Heaven forbid they look hot when you don't. If they have trim, shapely legs, they'll look hot in short shorts. And I'll bet your friend's face is far more attractive than yours.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually I really like these too and might order some :

https://www.wrangler.com/shop/womens-reworked-short-WBRWS.html?dwvar_WBRWS_color=WBRWSLS

Truck stop deep south $10 hooker, but don't let that stop ya'

It absolutely won’t, stay mad!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If you have the legs for them, they're hot at any age. Trashy looking, but but MILFs gotta MILF or GILF so get it! Not all of us want to look like we are bartenders in Tampa, but as long as you have the body for it, there is really no age limit.

No matter how many times you say stuff like this you won’t make confident people feel bad for wearing shorts in summer. You’re the one sweltering in capris and judging people while women wearing the shorts are just enjoying living their life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually I really like these too and might order some :

https://www.wrangler.com/shop/womens-reworked-short-WBRWS.html?dwvar_WBRWS_color=WBRWSLS

Truck stop deep south $10 hooker, but don't let that stop ya'

Yes!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm 43 and will not deny you the pleasure of seeing me in shorts. My legs are glorious. You're welcome!

You are going to blind us! Cover those cheeks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you have the legs for them, they're hot at any age. Trashy looking, but but MILFs gotta MILF or GILF so get it! Not all of us want to look like we are bartenders in Tampa, but as long as you have the body for it, there is really no age limit.

No matter how many times you say stuff like this you won’t make confident people feel bad for wearing shorts in summer. You’re the one sweltering in capris and judging people while women wearing the shorts are just enjoying living their life.

I'm in my 30s, I don't wear capris. I wear dresses and skirts in hot weather and don't have some kind of delusion that hotpants are the only thing you can wear to not swelter in the summer. People who wear these can be as "confident" as they want, but they still have no taste.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you have the legs for them, they're hot at any age. Trashy looking, but but MILFs gotta MILF or GILF so get it! Not all of us want to look like we are bartenders in Tampa, but as long as you have the body for it, there is really no age limit.

No matter how many times you say stuff like this you won’t make confident people feel bad for wearing shorts in summer. You’re the one sweltering in capris and judging people while women wearing the shorts are just enjoying living their life.

I'm in my 30s, I don't wear capris. I wear dresses and skirts in hot weather and don't have some kind of delusion that hotpants are the only thing you can wear to not swelter in the summer. People who wear these can be as "confident" as they want, but they still have no taste.

Skirts and dress look bad on your body. And of course, shorts look even worse on you, makes sense you are anti-shorts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you don't care about the disconnect between your body in youthful clothes and the wrinkles, crepey skin, age spots, thinning/graying hair, then rock on. I would take an honest assessment of that factor in a full-length mirror. Go for the OVERALL assessment, and not just "my legs look good."

This is a little harsh, but I generally agree. Even if you look great, at a certain age it looks a little desperate walking around in coochie cutters. As I have gotten older, I've wanted to look a bit more sophisticated and put together (I am 35) so something like shredded denim hot pants isn't really part of that look no matter how great my legs look. Leave if for the young girls or the beach, if you must.

Wow. I bet the first woman commenting is more like 50+ and you agree with her at 35. Surely you don’t have gray hair and crepey skin and age spots at 35?

No, I don't have any of those things and am thin without cellulite, so I wear 3-4in shorts. I don't wear things like this and think there is definitely an age cutoff where it starts looking inappropriate.

You know nobody is talking about shorts like that when we say short shorts.

What are we talking about? I’m 50 and athletic and have a few pairs of 4 inch denim shorts from Madewell and Agolde. I like them for very casual outings.

What kind of casual outings? Nascar? 1998 Panama City Spring Break? Body shots at Buffalo Wild Wings?

To the PP in bold, how old are you? This literally made me LOL, spring breakers and women doing body shots at BWW are not wearing 4" shorts!!! I do not consider 4" shorts inappropriate at all

[Anonymous]

I think it's 4" from waist to the bottom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think it's 4" from waist to the bottom.

Uh no it refers to the rise. The length of the zipper to the waistband.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's 4" from waist to the bottom.

Uh no it refers to the rise. The length of the zipper to the waistband.

It was a joke based on the pic. Duh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's 4" from waist to the bottom.

Uh no it refers to the rise. The length of the zipper to the waistband.

Doesn't it refer to the inseam?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's 4" from waist to the bottom.

Uh no it refers to the rise. The length of the zipper to the waistband.

It was a joke based on the pic. Duh.

Hysterical