
![]() |
Better than poor Beatrice whose wedding was cancelled 3 times. Even odds that Edo leaves before 2021. The Sussex wedding meanwhile is trending globally, they're enjoying their 2 year anniversary and the 1-year birthday of their son last month. Seems like they did everything right. Despite the naysayers complaining they got married too quickly, pregnant too quickly, started a family too quickly. Had they not they'd be in the middle of a pandemic without their beloved-and-healthy child. Seems like people just wanted them unhappy and they rose above it all. |
Not really. |
Ha. No way is it even a blip in the media. |
Why are you talking about Beatrice? That’s lame to deflect. |
Why are you bringing up a Queen who died hundreds of years ago? Beatrice's wedding date was scheduled for next Friday btw. Same chapel. She was hoping for a blowout wedding. Instead its nothing. |
This thread sucks. |
Because it was the wedding date given to Meghan and Harry by the Queen. Of all the dates, why would she give them such a morbid one? That Frankenstein wedding with the creepy page boy uniforms. |
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-8339749/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-reflective-second-wedding-anniversary.html
I think this is why many people find them supremely annoying. “Coming up for air?” They live a life of privileged luxury without the stress of working. They’ve brought the tabloid grief on themselves. If they moved to Idaho and stopped posting on social media, a lot of the negative coverage would go away. With everything going on in the world, how can they fail to realize the pity party approach isn’t helpful? |
DP, but yeah, pretty much. For instance, today is the anniversary of the start of the nuclear bomb testing on Bikini Atoll in 1946, and of a 1961 mob attack on Freedom Riders in Montgomery, Alabama. Cheery stuff. |
NP - agree wholeheartedly here. I liked her very much at first. Bright and engaging and brought a bit of the Diana touch compared to Kate (I like Kate very much too, but there's no denying she is extremely safe and dull, which makes her the perfect wife for a king). But the way the whole leaving the royal family was handled was badly done and surprisingly tone-deaf and I still don't quite understand the whole thing or why it was done except if you see it from the angle of self-absorbed, somewhat narcissistic woman and a man who's so deeply in love with her that he mistakes her decisions for solutions to his other problems. Then it starts to make sense. In his long years of bachelorhood Harry seemed very happy with his friends and their activities, but he's now completely bailed out of his old world for some sort of Hollywood glamor lifestyle that not only offers none of the privacy he claimed to want, but is completely at odds with his previous character. I don't think this is going to end well for Harry. |
Marrying a narcist rarely does. |
Fixed my typo. |
Do you have a life of your own? Or is posting the above over and over again your own interest in life? |