Pay to play ... now we know why

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FWIW, it’s not about the $$ itself. It’s about the ED of a nonprofit organization having influence over the compensation framework determined by the board. The ED may be the bad actor, but the board will be responsible if the IRS ever decides to take a close look. A big if, there are bigger tax issues out there for the IRS to pursue.

Go away!!!!!!!!!

Constant deflection. Ignoring the issue does not seem like a prudent path.

Yes. We should obsess and post constantly about a situation about which we know nothing and for which the IRS has governmental responsibility. That sounds far more prudent. Would love to see what goes neglected in your household given how well you have set your priorities. It is safe to say that given the hundreds of posts on this issue, nobody on these boards has ignored it. It is also pretty safe to say that either the IRS will do something or not.

I would think the club would want to address the matter on its own. Typically, if you wait for the IRS to come in to address something the pain is significantly worse. Proactive moves on the club’s part will help with mitigation pleas.

Yet again, not my club and nobody but you cares. Believe me, if you know how much he makes then the IRS does. Please demonstrate what is illegal.

The good news is jobs open up in late spring so perhaps you’ll finally land one and move on with your life.

Odd. For not being your club, you seem very invested. If you don’t care, no need to read the thread. Some do care, so please move on so we can have an adult conversation amongst ourselves.

I am invested now because this and other similar attacks on a club have popped up in many threads that are unrelated. So sorry, you posted something about your club and referred to it in many threads you have made it other peoples business.

I would love for you to go away but you won't. If you don't like being criticized then find another venue but you dragged folks into your made up soap opera.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FWIW, it’s not about the $$ itself. It’s about the ED of a nonprofit organization having influence over the compensation framework determined by the board. The ED may be the bad actor, but the board will be responsible if the IRS ever decides to take a close look. A big if, there are bigger tax issues out there for the IRS to pursue.

Go away!!!!!!!!!

Constant deflection. Ignoring the issue does not seem like a prudent path.

Yes. We should obsess and post constantly about a situation about which we know nothing and for which the IRS has governmental responsibility. That sounds far more prudent. Would love to see what goes neglected in your household given how well you have set your priorities. It is safe to say that given the hundreds of posts on this issue, nobody on these boards has ignored it. It is also pretty safe to say that either the IRS will do something or not.

I would think the club would want to address the matter on its own. Typically, if you wait for the IRS to come in to address something the pain is significantly worse. Proactive moves on the club’s part will help with mitigation pleas.

Yet again, not my club and nobody but you cares. Believe me, if you know how much he makes then the IRS does. Please demonstrate what is illegal.

The good news is jobs open up in late spring so perhaps you’ll finally land one and move on with your life.

Odd. For not being your club, you seem very invested. If you don’t care, no need to read the thread. Some do care, so please move on so we can have an adult conversation amongst ourselves.

I am invested now because this and other similar attacks on a club have popped up in many threads that are unrelated. So sorry, you posted something about your club and referred to it in many threads you have made it other peoples business.

I would love for you to go away but you won't. If you don't like being criticized then find another venue but you dragged folks into your made up soap opera.

So you are some sort of club defending vigilante? You must be new to the forum. Why does only Alexandria have these staunch defenders/deflectors/rationalizers on the forum. The aggressiveness makes me think there’s more going on than discussed earlier.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Sorry — links were broken — here’s the actual link from propublica. https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/540902413
Googling “[name of club] 990” worked.

He made 286K last year at 65 hours worked per week. The schedule J breaks it down further. What is the BFD?

You should go into business as an "online salary decider," I think you would really enjoy it.

Why don't you spend your time trolling Loudoun? Their director makes 190K at 40 hours worked per week, which is a higher compensation per hours worked than Alex. Plus, four other executives at Loudoun make over 100K.

Note to Loudoun parents: I have no idea how much value the director adds to your club or the club's overall financial picture. It could be worth it for all I know. Just pointing out that our own little Alex troll must have some other motivation for throwing around bug-eyed claims that the mafia is involved and the IRS is coming.

Kind of late to this thread and catching up. Isn’t Loudoun like 3 or 4 times larger? Also, I thought they owned that sports complex by the airport. Seems like there is a pretty large difference between the two jobs to assume hours are a good comparator.