375 former prosecutors believe Trump obstructed justice and should be charged as a felon

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mueller did not recommend prosecution. Period.

He didn't recommend it BECAUSE of the DOJ guidelines. He did not exonerate the president. That was made very specific in the report, leaving the decision to the Congress. He also cited the obstruction - lying, taking the fifth, destruction of evidence - as specific reasons he couldn't come to a conclusion on the "Russia collusion;" but the obstruction, he lays out 10 specific cases, 5 of which are absolute slam dunks, in terms of prosecutable cases.

Why are you defending a criminal president?

Not true. Nowhere in the Mueller report says “but for OLC guideline he would have charged”.

AG’s letter explicitly states it.

Actually it does. Did you read it?

Moot point. The AG after discussions with Mueller said there’s no there there. Sorry you don’t like it.
Exonerated!!

Case closed.

This is what we’re dealing with. Facts don’t matter to these morons.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mueller did not recommend prosecution. Period.

He didn't recommend it BECAUSE of the DOJ guidelines. He did not exonerate the president. That was made very specific in the report, leaving the decision to the Congress. He also cited the obstruction - lying, taking the fifth, destruction of evidence - as specific reasons he couldn't come to a conclusion on the "Russia collusion;" but the obstruction, he lays out 10 specific cases, 5 of which are absolute slam dunks, in terms of prosecutable cases.

Why are you defending a criminal president?

Not true. Nowhere in the Mueller report says “but for OLC guideline he would have charged”.

AG’s letter explicitly states it.

Actually it does. Did you read it?

Moot point. The AG after discussions with Mueller said there’s no there there. Sorry you don’t like it.
Exonerated!!

Case closed.

This is what we’re dealing with. Facts don’t matter to these morons.

So we need to keep reminding them of the facts.

The Special Counsel states that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
— William P. Barr, letter to Lindsey Graham, Dianne Feinstein, Doug Collins, and Jerrold Nadler, 24 Mar. 2019
[Report Post]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mueller did not recommend prosecution. Period.

He didn't recommend it BECAUSE of the DOJ guidelines. He did not exonerate the president. That was made very specific in the report, leaving the decision to the Congress. He also cited the obstruction - lying, taking the fifth, destruction of evidence - as specific reasons he couldn't come to a conclusion on the "Russia collusion;" but the obstruction, he lays out 10 specific cases, 5 of which are absolute slam dunks, in terms of prosecutable cases.

Why are you defending a criminal president?

Not true. Nowhere in the Mueller report says “but for OLC guideline he would have charged”.

AG’s letter explicitly states it.

Actually it does. Did you read it?

Moot point. The AG after discussions with Mueller said there’s no there there. Sorry you don’t like it.
Exonerated!!

Case closed.

This is what we’re dealing with. Facts don’t matter to these morons.

So we need to keep reminding them of the facts.

The Special Counsel states that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
— William P. Barr, letter to Lindsey Graham, Dianne Feinstein, Doug Collins, and Jerrold Nadler, 24 Mar. 2019
[Report Post]

Not even not guilty, but no crimes committed, despite repeated overtures! Exoneration!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mueller did not recommend prosecution. Period.

He didn't recommend it BECAUSE of the DOJ guidelines. He did not exonerate the president. That was made very specific in the report, leaving the decision to the Congress. He also cited the obstruction - lying, taking the fifth, destruction of evidence - as specific reasons he couldn't come to a conclusion on the "Russia collusion;" but the obstruction, he lays out 10 specific cases, 5 of which are absolute slam dunks, in terms of prosecutable cases.

Why are you defending a criminal president?

Not true. Nowhere in the Mueller report says “but for OLC guideline he would have charged”.

AG’s letter explicitly states it.

Actually it does. Did you read it?

Moot point. The AG after discussions with Mueller said there’s no there there. Sorry you don’t like it.
Exonerated!!

Case closed.

This is what we’re dealing with. Facts don’t matter to these morons.

So we need to keep reminding them of the facts.

The Special Counsel states that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
— William P. Barr, letter to Lindsey Graham, Dianne Feinstein, Doug Collins, and Jerrold Nadler, 24 Mar. 2019
[Report Post]

Not even not guilty, but no crimes committed, despite repeated overtures! Exoneration!

So, btw, obstruction of justice is a crime. Barr may not realize this but we all know that it is.

[Anonymous]

Over 700 now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mueller did not recommend prosecution. Period.

He didn't recommend it BECAUSE of the DOJ guidelines. He did not exonerate the president. That was made very specific in the report, leaving the decision to the Congress. He also cited the obstruction - lying, taking the fifth, destruction of evidence - as specific reasons he couldn't come to a conclusion on the "Russia collusion;" but the obstruction, he lays out 10 specific cases, 5 of which are absolute slam dunks, in terms of prosecutable cases.

Why are you defending a criminal president?

Not true. Nowhere in the Mueller report says “but for OLC guideline he would have charged”.

AG’s letter explicitly states it.

Actually it does. Did you read it?

Moot point. The AG after discussions with Mueller said there’s no there there. Sorry you don’t like it.
Exonerated!!

Case closed.

This is what we’re dealing with. Facts don’t matter to these morons.

So we need to keep reminding them of the facts.

The Special Counsel states that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
— William P. Barr, letter to Lindsey Graham, Dianne Feinstein, Doug Collins, and Jerrold Nadler, 24 Mar. 2019
[Report Post]

Prosecutors are not in the business of exonerate people. They bring charge or shut up. It's a rookie mistake to include that politically charged line in the report. Mueller did not bring charge. AG and Rosenstein didn't bring charge. Case closed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mueller did not recommend prosecution. Period.

He didn't recommend it BECAUSE of the DOJ guidelines. He did not exonerate the president. That was made very specific in the report, leaving the decision to the Congress. He also cited the obstruction - lying, taking the fifth, destruction of evidence - as specific reasons he couldn't come to a conclusion on the "Russia collusion;" but the obstruction, he lays out 10 specific cases, 5 of which are absolute slam dunks, in terms of prosecutable cases.

Why are you defending a criminal president?

Not true. Nowhere in the Mueller report says “but for OLC guideline he would have charged”.

AG’s letter explicitly states it.

Actually it does. Did you read it?

Moot point. The AG after discussions with Mueller said there’s no there there. Sorry you don’t like it.
Exonerated!!

Case closed.

This is what we’re dealing with. Facts don’t matter to these morons.

So we need to keep reminding them of the facts.

The Special Counsel states that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
— William P. Barr, letter to Lindsey Graham, Dianne Feinstein, Doug Collins, and Jerrold Nadler, 24 Mar. 2019
[Report Post]

Prosecutors are not in the business of exonerate people. They bring charge or shut up. It's a rookie mistake to include that politically charged line in the report. Mueller did not bring charge. AG and Rosenstein didn't bring charge. Case closed.

The DOJ doesn't bring charges against the president. That's for another to do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So when Trump is no longer President, he can be charged with obstruction for crimes he committed while President?

IDK but after he dies maybe democrats can dig up his corpse and put it on trial.

#resist

LOL. I know. It's ridiculous

What is ridiculous is supporting the POTUS at this point. His criminality is blatant and disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mueller did not recommend prosecution. Period.

He didn't recommend it BECAUSE of the DOJ guidelines. He did not exonerate the president. That was made very specific in the report, leaving the decision to the Congress. He also cited the obstruction - lying, taking the fifth, destruction of evidence - as specific reasons he couldn't come to a conclusion on the "Russia collusion;" but the obstruction, he lays out 10 specific cases, 5 of which are absolute slam dunks, in terms of prosecutable cases.

Why are you defending a criminal president?

Not true. Nowhere in the Mueller report says “but for OLC guideline he would have charged”.

AG’s letter explicitly states it.

Actually it does. Did you read it?

Moot point. The AG after discussions with Mueller said there’s no there there. Sorry you don’t like it.
Exonerated!!

Case closed.

This is what we’re dealing with. Facts don’t matter to these morons.

Some are morons. Some are without morals and/or criminals like him and just don't care.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mueller did not recommend prosecution. Period.

He didn't recommend it BECAUSE of the DOJ guidelines. He did not exonerate the president. That was made very specific in the report, leaving the decision to the Congress. He also cited the obstruction - lying, taking the fifth, destruction of evidence - as specific reasons he couldn't come to a conclusion on the "Russia collusion;" but the obstruction, he lays out 10 specific cases, 5 of which are absolute slam dunks, in terms of prosecutable cases.

Why are you defending a criminal president?

Not true. Nowhere in the Mueller report says “but for OLC guideline he would have charged”.

AG’s letter explicitly states it.

Actually it does. Did you read it?

Moot point. The AG after discussions with Mueller said there’s no there there. Sorry you don’t like it.
Exonerated!!

Case closed.

This is what we’re dealing with. Facts don’t matter to these morons.

So we need to keep reminding them of the facts.

The Special Counsel states that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
— William P. Barr, letter to Lindsey Graham, Dianne Feinstein, Doug Collins, and Jerrold Nadler, 24 Mar. 2019
[Report Post]

Prosecutors are not in the business of exonerate people. They bring charge or shut up. It's a rookie mistake to include that politically charged line in the report. Mueller did not bring charge. AG and Rosenstein didn't bring charge. Case closed.

The rules might be a little different for a sitting President. Perhaps check the Constitution for the remedy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mueller did not recommend prosecution. Period.

He didn't recommend it BECAUSE of the DOJ guidelines. He did not exonerate the president. That was made very specific in the report, leaving the decision to the Congress. He also cited the obstruction - lying, taking the fifth, destruction of evidence - as specific reasons he couldn't come to a conclusion on the "Russia collusion;" but the obstruction, he lays out 10 specific cases, 5 of which are absolute slam dunks, in terms of prosecutable cases.

Why are you defending a criminal president?

Not true. Nowhere in the Mueller report says “but for OLC guideline he would have charged”.

AG’s letter explicitly states it.

Actually it does. Did you read it?

Moot point. The AG after discussions with Mueller said there’s no there there. Sorry you don’t like it.
Exonerated!!

Case closed.

This is what we’re dealing with. Facts don’t matter to these morons.

So we need to keep reminding them of the facts.

The Special Counsel states that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
— William P. Barr, letter to Lindsey Graham, Dianne Feinstein, Doug Collins, and Jerrold Nadler, 24 Mar. 2019
[Report Post]

Prosecutors are not in the business of exonerate people. They bring charge or shut up. It's a rookie mistake to include that politically charged line in the report. Mueller did not bring charge. AG and Rosenstein didn't bring charge. Case closed.

The DOJ doesn't bring charges against the president. That's for another to do.

Specifically:

[Anonymous]

Never a winning play to sign a letter like this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mueller did not recommend prosecution. Period.

He didn't recommend it BECAUSE of the DOJ guidelines. He did not exonerate the president. That was made very specific in the report, leaving the decision to the Congress. He also cited the obstruction - lying, taking the fifth, destruction of evidence - as specific reasons he couldn't come to a conclusion on the "Russia collusion;" but the obstruction, he lays out 10 specific cases, 5 of which are absolute slam dunks, in terms of prosecutable cases.

Why are you defending a criminal president?

Not true. Nowhere in the Mueller report says “but for OLC guideline he would have charged”.

AG’s letter explicitly states it.

Actually it does. Did you read it?

Moot point. The AG after discussions with Mueller said there’s no there there. Sorry you don’t like it.
Exonerated!!

Case closed.

This is what we’re dealing with. Facts don’t matter to these morons.

Mueller you said. Collusion you said.
Exoneration we said.

[Anonymous]

Even Barr said “no exoneration”.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mueller did not recommend prosecution. Period.

He didn't recommend it BECAUSE of the DOJ guidelines. He did not exonerate the president. That was made very specific in the report, leaving the decision to the Congress. He also cited the obstruction - lying, taking the fifth, destruction of evidence - as specific reasons he couldn't come to a conclusion on the "Russia collusion;" but the obstruction, he lays out 10 specific cases, 5 of which are absolute slam dunks, in terms of prosecutable cases.

Why are you defending a criminal president?

Not true. Nowhere in the Mueller report says “but for OLC guideline he would have charged”.

AG’s letter explicitly states it.

Actually it does. Did you read it?

Moot point. The AG after discussions with Mueller said there’s no there there. Sorry you don’t like it.
Exonerated!!

Case closed.

This is what we’re dealing with. Facts don’t matter to these morons.

Mueller you said. Collusion you said.
Exoneration we said.

The report straight out said he is not. To say he is means one of two things, you are a complete idiot or a blatant liar. Period. End of story.