375 former prosecutors believe Trump obstructed justice and should be charged as a felon

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nothingburger. There is over 1,000 active federal prosecutors in NY alone, 10s of thousands across the US.

certainly a lot more former prosecutors.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Attorney

Each district can have up to 350 federal prosecutors and there are 93 districts.

So if you pull just active attorney that's nothing. If you had former prosecutors how many is that? Almost a million? Probably more than a million former federal attorneys. Heck I know five myself and three of them are at the same gym I go to.

This isn't even a story.

And many of those former prosecutors are now in private practice and regularly work with the DOJ - like my DH - and so they won't sign it even though they 100% agree with the letter.

[Anonymous]

So now is saying "no collusion and essentially no obstruction"

What?

[Anonymous]

Now up to over 400.

Trump is a criminal. And a traitor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Now up to over 400.

Trump is a criminal. And a traitor.

Actually more than that. But, again, that is out of tens of thousands. It is highly likely that more disagree with that letter than agree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Sorry, we can't take your word for it, anonymous poster over that of 400+ prosecutors. Mueller's report (if you read it) has ample evidence of obstruction.

Have you any idea how many "former prosecutors" there are? Hint: way more than you think.

The "way more" former prosecutors are free to sign their own opinion letter. Why don't they?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now up to over 400.

Trump is a criminal. And a traitor.

Actually more than that. But, again, that is out of tens of thousands. It is highly likely that more disagree with that letter than agree.

I'm sure Trump is getting those signatures as we speak. LOL

How do you know it's "highly likely"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothingburger. There is over 1,000 active federal prosecutors in NY alone, 10s of thousands across the US.

certainly a lot more former prosecutors.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Attorney

Each district can have up to 350 federal prosecutors and there are 93 districts.

So if you pull just active attorney that's nothing. If you had former prosecutors how many is that? Almost a million? Probably more than a million former federal attorneys. Heck I know five myself and three of them are at the same gym I go to.

This isn't even a story.

And many of those former prosecutors are now in private practice and regularly work with the DOJ - like my DH - and so they won't sign it even though they 100% agree with the letter.

I work at DoJ and that's false. Many of them do not agree with these other prosecutors nor do they believe there was obstruction.

[Anonymous]

I work at DoJ and that's false. Many of them do not agree with these other prosecutors nor do they believe there was obstruction.

From what I hear from my former AUSA contact, this is absolutely true.

As for signing a letter in support? Why should they? My contact has said that he spent his career working for different administrations and prosecuting based on law --not politics. He could not stand HRC--but also was stunned when Comey made his non-prosecution prosecution against her. He said that is not Comey's job. Even though, he felt that Comey laid out a case for prosecution, he said that he should not have done that. That is not the way our laws work. Also, without question, Lynch should have recused herself--which she never did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothingburger. There is over 1,000 active federal prosecutors in NY alone, 10s of thousands across the US.

certainly a lot more former prosecutors.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Attorney

Each district can have up to 350 federal prosecutors and there are 93 districts.

So if you pull just active attorney that's nothing. If you had former prosecutors how many is that? Almost a million? Probably more than a million former federal attorneys. Heck I know five myself and three of them are at the same gym I go to.

This isn't even a story.

And many of those former prosecutors are now in private practice and regularly work with the DOJ - like my DH - and so they won't sign it even though they 100% agree with the letter.

I work at DoJ and that's false. Many of them do not agree with these other prosecutors nor do they believe there was obstruction.

Prove that you work at DoJ. And just because "many" of them do not believe there was obstruction, that doesn't negate the possibility that many of them do believe there was obstruction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothingburger. There is over 1,000 active federal prosecutors in NY alone, 10s of thousands across the US.

certainly a lot more former prosecutors.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Attorney

Each district can have up to 350 federal prosecutors and there are 93 districts.

So if you pull just active attorney that's nothing. If you had former prosecutors how many is that? Almost a million? Probably more than a million former federal attorneys. Heck I know five myself and three of them are at the same gym I go to.

This isn't even a story.

And many of those former prosecutors are now in private practice and regularly work with the DOJ - like my DH - and so they won't sign it even though they 100% agree with the letter.

I work at DoJ and that's false. Many of them do not agree with these other prosecutors nor do they believe there was obstruction.

Prove that you work at DoJ. And just because "many" of them do not believe there was obstruction, that doesn't negate the possibility that many of them do believe there was obstruction.

^PP's version of "many" is like Trump's version of "many".. it's call hyperbole. LOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I work at DoJ and that's false. Many of them do not agree with these other prosecutors nor do they believe there was obstruction.

From what I hear from my former AUSA contact, this is absolutely true.

As for signing a letter in support? Why should they? My contact has said that he spent his career working for different administrations and prosecuting based on law --not politics. He could not stand HRC--but also was stunned when Comey made his non-prosecution prosecution against her. He said that is not Comey's job. Even though, he felt that Comey laid out a case for prosecution, he said that he should not have done that. That is not the way our laws work. Also, without question, Lynch should have recused herself--which she never did.

And what does any of that have to do with the total destruction of the rule of law taking place now?

[Anonymous]

At what point does Occam's Razor come into play with you people?

Which is more likely: that a massive cabal involving the entire US intelligence apparatus is out to get poor Donald Trump because he won an election, or that a man with some of the shadiest financing in the world, who literally surrounded himself with Russian oligarchs and state agents, might actually be a severely compromised national security risk?

Christ almighty, the willful ignorance of some of you just boggles the mind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:At what point does Occam's Razor come into play with you people?

Which is more likely: that a massive cabal involving the entire US intelligence apparatus is out to get poor Donald Trump because he won an election, or that a man with some of the shadiest financing in the world, who literally surrounded himself with Russian oligarchs and state agents, might actually be a severely compromised national security risk?

Christ almighty, the willful ignorance of some of you just boggles the mind.

Gee. Think about this. Do you really believe these people are above the law? Do you think it was okay for Hoover to spy on Martin Luther King, Jr? Comey was so self-righteous that he thinks it was okay to use dubious information to get a warrant to spy. You think that is okay?
Do you understand how this all leaked out? Orchestrated by Comey. He admitted it.
The question now is was it Comey or Brennan who pushed for it the most. My vote is for Brennan. These people all thought they were so good and righteous that it made it "okay."

And, remember, Comey's wife participated in the Women's March the day after Trump was inaugurated. And, apparently, he thought that was okay. Legally, I guess it is, but it tells me a lot about what was going on in his head. He said his wife was a big HRC supporter. He knew HRC was guilty. Think that influenced him? He was a very conflicted man. So, he tried to play Solomon. Didn't work: he split the baby.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothingburger. There is over 1,000 active federal prosecutors in NY alone, 10s of thousands across the US.

certainly a lot more former prosecutors.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Attorney

Each district can have up to 350 federal prosecutors and there are 93 districts.

So if you pull just active attorney that's nothing. If you had former prosecutors how many is that? Almost a million? Probably more than a million former federal attorneys. Heck I know five myself and three of them are at the same gym I go to.

This isn't even a story.

And many of those former prosecutors are now in private practice and regularly work with the DOJ - like my DH - and so they won't sign it even though they 100% agree with the letter.

I work at DoJ and that's false. Many of them do not agree with these other prosecutors nor do they believe there was obstruction.

Prove that you work at DoJ. And just because "many" of them do not believe there was obstruction, that doesn't negate the possibility that many of them do believe there was obstruction.

How, post a picture of my PIV card? Lol not likely.

Fact of the matter is I work there and work with judges and attorneys and not one them think there was obstruction, not one. Most employees that do not like him don’t even think there’s obstruction.

In fact - most I know here voted for him. Not all but a good portion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At what point does Occam's Razor come into play with you people?

Which is more likely: that a massive cabal involving the entire US intelligence apparatus is out to get poor Donald Trump because he won an election, or that a man with some of the shadiest financing in the world, who literally surrounded himself with Russian oligarchs and state agents, might actually be a severely compromised national security risk?

Christ almighty, the willful ignorance of some of you just boggles the mind.

Gee. Think about this. Do you really believe these people are above the law? Do you think it was okay for Hoover to spy on Martin Luther King, Jr? Comey was so self-righteous that he thinks it was okay to use dubious information to get a warrant to spy. You think that is okay?
Do you understand how this all leaked out? Orchestrated by Comey. He admitted it.
The question now is was it Comey or Brennan who pushed for it the most. My vote is for Brennan. These people all thought they were so good and righteous that it made it "okay."

And, remember, Comey's wife participated in the Women's March the day after Trump was inaugurated. And, apparently, he thought that was okay. Legally, I guess it is, but it tells me a lot about what was going on in his head. He said his wife was a big HRC supporter. He knew HRC was guilty. Think that influenced him? He was a very conflicted man. So, he tried to play Solomon. Didn't work: he split the baby.

Yeah. The thing about Comey is, he's weird and arrogant. And right.

And you're silly.