So if it can all be faked, how should college admissions work?

post reply Forum Index » College and University Discussion

◄ 1 2 3 ... 5 6 7 ... 12 13 14 ► Go

Go to page...

03/13/2019 12:20

Subject: So if it can all be faked, how should college admissions work?

quote

Anonymous

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here’s a better system:

Take sports out of the admissions process. All the college teams can become clubs (much like the European soccer clubs) that are affiliated with the university. Athletes can be paid and they get to take classes part time at the college.

In addition to removing sports from the college application, remove extracurriculars as well. Admission should be granted based upon SAT scores, GPA and AP exam grades. College as an academic experience should be based on academic performance. All students should be given AP tests for free - much like the English A-level exams. I understand that whatever system exists will be games but grades from 3 separate unconnected institutions (SAT, GPA, AP) seems like the best approach. Things like “fit” and extracurriculars make it way too easy for the wealthy to game the system.

David Leonhardt, NYT editorial board member, makes the same argument in his newsletter today, with a study to back it up.

The admissions scandal

Getting a peek inside the college-admissions process isn’t easy. But a team of academic researchers managed to do so several years ago. It helped, no doubt, that two of the researchers were former college presidents — William Bowen of Princeton and Eugene Tobin of Hamilton.

The researchers were given access to anonymous admissions records at 19 elite colleges and then analyzed how admissions offices treated different groups of students. Low-income students, for example, were no more likely to be admitted than otherwise similar students with virtually identical academic records. So-called legacy students — those whose parents attended the same schools — received substantial boosts. So did underrepresented minorities.

But the biggest boost went to recruited athletes: An athlete was about 30 percentage points more likely to be admitted than a nonathlete with the same academic record.

I thought of that study yesterday after the Justice Department announced it had indicted 50 people for trying to rig the admissions process. The alleged scam involved payments funneled from parents to college coaches, who in return would falsely identify applicants as athletic recruits to the admissions office. Just like that, the students then become virtual shoo-ins for acceptance.

If the accusations are true, they’re outrageous. But they also highlight a larger problem in the admissions process that has somehow become acceptable: A scam like this could exist only because competitive sports occupy a ridiculously large place in that process.

The situation is different for other extracurricular activities. Great musicians are more likely to be admitted to a college than similar students who don’t play an instrument — as is only fair, because musicians deserve credit for their accomplishments. But the musicians don’t generally receive a 30-percentage-point boost on their admissions chances. Stage managers for the high school theater don’t, either. Nor do student body presidents, debaters, yearbook editors or robotics competitors.

Athletes do. Their extracurricular activities are not treated merely as an important part of a college application but as a defining part. “Athletic recruiting is the biggest form of affirmative action in American higher education, even at schools such as ours,” as Philip Smith, a former dean of admissions at Williams College, has said. It’s a relic of the supposedly character-defining role that sports played in elite colleges a century ago.
And sports have retained their unique place in the admissions process even though most teams at elite colleges are not good enough to compete for national championships. To put it another way, the student athletes being recruited to these colleges are not among the very best in the country at what they do. They are extremely good, yes, and they work hard, yes — but that also tends to be true of high school musicians, student government leaders and so on.

I’m a sports fan and long-ago high school athlete. I have a lot of admiration for students who are talented enough and work hard enough to play sports in college. But they are not a different species. It’s time to end the extreme special treatment that colleges give to so many of them. College sports can still exist without it.

That will never happen. Star college athletes and bring more money into colleges than anyone else. Pro athletes get endorsements that pay them money. In college, the athlete gets nothing and the college gets millions.
https://www.salon.com/2013/09/24/the_shocking_college_athlete_rip_off_now_theyre_fighting_back/

Part of the problem with straight scores or whatever is that it unfairly gives wealthy people an advantage. I'm not even talking about race here. Some of my family lives in a county in the Appalachian Mountains that has one high school for the entire county. Some kids take a 2hr bus ride each way. They don't have all the same AP classes you would get around here and almost no one is wealthy enough to hire a tutor (if you could even find one). SAT prep isn't a thing there. They really just don't have the same quality of education. So if you based all admission on simply SAT score for example, these people would never get into college. One thing many college's do though, is that they try to admit people from different states, regions, and with different backgrounds. That's something that helps people in this situation.

Then hire star athletes to play the big sports on behalf of the team and pay them a wage commensurate with the value they are bringing to the university. If those athletes want to attend classes too, make it a benefit of their job, like the health insurance they would be entitled to.

But the Stanford sailing team, and the USC rowing team, and the Georgetown tennis team abringingbringin ANY money into college.