Why hrc was right about white women - and their husbands

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am a white married woman in her 50's and many of my friends are similar. None of us voted for Trump.

Unless you were in the voting booth with them, you don't know how they voted,but I can see why your friends might have lied to you, you arrogant sack.

Shouldn't you be starting on dinner for your husband or something? Ironing his tighty whiteys?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hey libs, I would like to continue this discussion, but I need to fix myself breakfast. Excuse me while I call my husband to ask him what I should eat.

Sausage? I'm betting he'll suggest it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I graduated from law school so of course I voted for HIllary and got my husband to as well.

I hate there are so many dumb whites

You.got your husband to? How by nagging or withholding sex? He must be very weak to let you dictate his vote. I'll bet you're already cheating on the simp.

[Anonymous]

Lock Her Up. Emails.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I graduated from law school so of course I voted for HIllary and got my husband to as well.

I hate there are so many dumb whites

I graduated from law school so of course I did not vote for Hillary. My husband also graduated from law school so I didn't need to tell him how to vote.

I don't hate.

[Anonymous]

Nothing makes a white woman more conservative than having a white son.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Seriously? You just can't admit that women decide for themselves who to vote for? The most sexist attitude of all comes from you liberals who insist white women must have been persuaded, coerced, or bullied into voting for Trump - against their wishes, of course.

If anyone is setting back women, it's the left with their infantilizing of educated white women (and women in general).

It's appalling that you're actually blaming white women for HRC's loss, rather than taking a good, hard, dispassionate look at HRC herself and asking yourselves: why did my candidate lose? And then coming up with the correct answer, all on your own. She lost because she was an unappealing candidate. Own it and move on.

Wow, I don't know how you got lost and ended up on dcum (you're very clear spoken and apparently immune to leftist drivel) but god bless you and welcome! Well said!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously? You just can't admit that women decide for themselves who to vote for? The most sexist attitude of all comes from you liberals who insist white women must have been persuaded, coerced, or bullied into voting for Trump - against their wishes, of course.

If anyone is setting back women, it's the left with their infantilizing of educated white women (and women in general).

It's appalling that you're actually blaming white women for HRC's loss, rather than taking a good, hard, dispassionate look at HRC herself and asking yourselves: why did my candidate lose? And then coming up with the correct answer, all on your own. She lost because she was an unappealing candidate. Own it and move on.

She was unappealing because of sexism. People are less likely to like strong women.

Psst: She was unappealing because Clinton is NOT a strong woman. She can't do anything on her own. She is the very sort of woman who would obey her husband's command to vote a certain way.

I'm a former R, and did not ever support the Clintons. I voted for both Bushes, but one thing I would never say about HRC is that she is a weak woman. No, she is a very strong woman, and though I may not agree with her, that is one thing I have often admired about her.. how tenacious she is. Even Trump admitted to that.

-signed a woman

Well, she fiercely defended her rapist husband so there's that.
She's strong - not ethics - but "strong" I suppose

If a woman accused your DH of rape, I'm going to assume that you love him so you would fiercely defend him. That doesn't make her "weak".

Yes it does. And a fool as well. Thank god she lost.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You Trumpkins think men should rule everything. Poor dears...stupid...please go to college

You're husband is a beta male and you have no respect for him.

First of all, it’s “Your” as another poster has pointed out. (and YOU are lecturing about going to college?)
Secondly, it is the left who THINK that conservatives THINK that men should rule everything.
Nothing is further from the truth. As conservative women, we have our own thoughts, our own minds, and we make our own decisions.
Some of us are even married to liberals! Imagine that! (Are liberals beta males too?)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So it's OK to blame women for HRC's loss, but you can't blame HRC herself, because that would be sexist.

Wow, gotta give the libs credit for thinking out of the box.....

Wait, no, that can't be. Dang let's close this thread, it's too confusing. Russia, Russia, Russia, or something.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nothing makes a white woman more conservative than having a white son.

I never thought of it like that but I believe you have the single best insight regarding this whole topic

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seriously? You just can't admit that women decide for themselves who to vote for? The most sexist attitude of all comes from you liberals who insist white women must have been persuaded, coerced, or bullied into voting for Trump - against their wishes, of course.

If anyone is setting back women, it's the left with their infantilizing of educated white women (and women in general).

It's appalling that you're actually blaming white women for HRC's loss, rather than taking a good, hard, dispassionate look at HRC herself and asking yourselves: why did my candidate lose? And then coming up with the correct answer, all on your own. She lost because she was an unappealing candidate. Own it and move on.

She was unappealing because of sexism. People are less likely to like strong women.

Psst: She was unappealing because Clinton is NOT a strong woman. She can't do anything on her own. She is the very sort of woman who would obey her husband's command to vote a certain way.

I'm a former R, and did not ever support the Clintons. I voted for both Bushes, but one thing I would never say about HRC is that she is a weak woman. No, she is a very strong woman, and though I may not agree with her, that is one thing I have often admired about her.. how tenacious she is. Even Trump admitted to that.

-signed a woman

Well, she fiercely defended her rapist husband so there's that.
She's strong - not ethics - but "strong" I suppose

If a woman accused your DH of rape, I'm going to assume that you love him so you would fiercely defend him. That doesn't make her "weak".

Yes it does. And a fool as well. Thank god she lost.

So you would never defend your DH from rape accusations? Does he know this? Wow.

[Anonymous]

But, HRC says that we should believe ALL women who say they were raped.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:But, HRC says that we should believe ALL women who say they were raped.

But then again, she's a bonifide pathological liar.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But, HRC says that we should believe ALL women who say they were raped.

But then again, she's a bonifide pathological liar.

Forget to take your meds today, Dotard? Ask your husband to get them out for you.