Britneys face is really different now

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about Jessica Simpson? Wasn't she big back then?

Milk no she was ridiculously small peanuts

The girl pop star hierarchy was

BRITNEY

at a way distant second, Christina Aguilera. Then the minor nobodies: Jessica Simpson, Mandy Moore. You only know Jessica Simpson now because of a newlyweds. She was truly a d list nobody before that and her music was never good nor was her style. Brit was everything, I'm telling you guys.

J Lo was also rising around that same time. Where would you rank her?

She wasn't in the same category. These were all young pop stars. Jennifer Lopez at that time was more urban R&B. She was considered hot because of her hurt, nobody actually held her to Britney's level nor was she even close to the level of exposure Brit was. Britney had Pepsi commercials, Super Bowl halftime shows, massive world tours and her music video releases were events (probably the last of the days when this was true).

[Anonymous]

Her butt DAMMIT IPHONE

[Anonymous]

Also Jennifer is now 48. That means she was in her early 30s back in Brit's heyday. For the target audience, that was considered old. We liked her because of Selena, that's pretty much it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Also Jennifer is now 48. That means she was in her early 30s back in Brit's heyday. For the target audience, that was considered old. We liked her because of Selena, that's pretty much it.

Target audience being teens?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Also Jennifer is now 48. That means she was in her early 30s back in Brit's heyday. For the target audience, that was considered old. We liked her because of Selena, that's pretty much it.

I'm Britney's age and disagree with the comment on Jennifer Lopez, she was not seen as old (then). The young crowd was very into JLo. She had music, movies, glitz, glamour. Also who do you think was wearing her perfume and clothing line? Certainly not 30 year olds. And don't forget J Lo's love life - Kim Kardashian had nothing on this woman.

[Anonymous]

I'm not saying she wasn't big I'm saying she wasn't at Britney's level

[Anonymous]

Also a younger person. Jennifer was huge in the mainstream back then, and not just for urban R&B. The dress- The Dress!- at the Grammy's? Huge cultural moment then, although it wouldn't raise an eyebrow now. And Bennifer? J Lo dominated the tabloids. Also got a lot of press for her physique.

No, she wasn't on Britney's level. Few have been. Maybe the eight year olds at Britney concerts didn't care for her, but she was definitely big among teens too (I was a young teen then and hung out on a lot of teen-focused message boards).

Jessica Simpson came nowhere close to Britney. The reality show got her more notice than her career. I agree w the PP that Christina was the distant second to Britney. As far as I can remember right now, all or most of the rest of her contemporaries were one-hit types. Their songs had more impact than they did.