I could tell you a lot of stories about the drunken and drug fueled parties among teenagers. In Ruxton, Cockeysville, Hunt Valley, Phoenix and Monkton. Had a good friend raped when she was only 15. Good luck. |
| Sad but drugs are everywhere. No area is free of those dangers. It is an epidemic. |
| hi OP, did you find the house? |
| If you are willing to move to Baltimore why not move to Richmond? More bang for your buck and some great walkable neighborhoods. |
baltimore has a much better location. |
|
NP here.
I used to live in Baltimore and don't dislike it. But I think you'd actually be happier in Frederick. You could get a nice house in downtown Frederick and still have the feel of a city without the stress of one. Frederick doesn't have much in the way of public transit, but neither does Baltimore. And it's way easier going to things in Frederick. |
Huh? No, just no. I've lived in Baltimore (very close to the section you mention, in fact). I'm not a squeamish, pearl-clutching type, but I would not walk to Belvedere Square or the Senator after dark. Period. If you are talking about walking there in the afternoon, broad daylight, you need to make that clear. Otherwise, you are greatly misleading people. I love Baltimore. It will always have a place in my heart, but I don't think it's fair to mislead people. I agree with the Roland Park poster who says that a lot of people seem to have a vested interest in keeping the crime quiet. I had a similar experience in another neighborhood. People said up and down how great it is, that there is only petty crime that you'd find anywhere, etc., but that was not the reality. And it was not at all walkable. I consider walkable to mean I can walk around the neighborhood in the early morning or in the evening (when it's not quite dark) and feel safe. But that is not the case, unless you have a large, intimidating dog. Even then, it's questionable. |
That was my experience as well. I lived in a neighborhood that was historically one of the better, safer neighborhoods, but it definitely went in the opposite direction. There are a few factors that are contributing to that, which I won't go into here because they should be threads all their own. I say this as someone who loves certain things about Baltimore and who was an active and engaged resident. I'm not saying I'd discourage people from moving to Baltimore, but I don't think it's what OP is looking for. I actually think something like Frederick would be more suitable. |
|
PP who used to live in Baltimore (different neighborhoods at different times) here.
I have friends who still live in Baltimore and won't leave. But even they wouldn't describe it as "walkable" in the way OP mentions. Public transit in Baltimore is horrible. There are a variety of systems (light rail, subway, metro), but they don't link up, so there really is no equivalent to the D.C. metro. And even just walking around the neighborhood, most long-time Baltimore residents I know don't walk around when the sun starts to go down or even in the early morning (when the sun is up). They just don't. OP says she wants a walkable urban feel but without the stress of the city. Baltimore isn't the same kind of stress as D.C., but it is a different kind of stress (and with far less walkability). I think that is the point people are trying to make. If OP is not bound to any particular location, there are other areas (like Frederick) that may even be cheaper than Baltimore (esp. in taxes) and provide more of what she is looking for. |
\ huh? the girls were 14? how for long do they must have chaperones? women in their 30s and 40s get murdered all the time. not sure the solution is to go out with parents only. |
frederick is not a city. i live in baltimore, in one of the harbor neighborhoods. some parts are very walkable (walk scores in the nineties); the least walkable parts have walk scores in the sixties. all the harbor neighborhoods are safe, most are pretty. water taxi works pretty good. personally i much prefer the harbor area to roland park, which is beautiful to drive through but houses are a mess inside and it's not that walkable or urban. |
so she is misleading people if she walks to the square at the times people actually go there vs. in the middle of the night? okay. |
The sun goes down at 5pm in the winter. So she's not seeing any movies that let out later than that at the Senator or walking there to have dinner and a drink and then walking home. I lived in Baltimore. And it was frustrating not feeling safe to go on a walk when I got home from work. As I said, I'm not a pearl clutcher. I actually live in PG County now. And my suburban neighborhood is far more walkable in any real sense of the word than my Baltimore neighborhood was. I'm not a Baltimore hater. But I think it's misleading to say that area of Baltimore is truly walkable. Maybe at noon. But outside of that, not really. |
your distinction between daylight and dark is kind of ridiculous. otoh, you are right that baltimore is not as walkable as some people imagine. this is especially true for roland park area that OP inquired about, which is more suburbanish than city like. homeland borders some sketchy parts and its walkability scores are inflated. at the same time, if you live in the right spot in federal hill, canton or harbor east your walk score will be 95. in my opinion it is baltimore's public transportation that prevents it from being carless city in a way big cities are. i grew up in europe in a densely populated city and lived in manhattan for many years. no matter how walkable your immediate neighborhood, public transportation is essential for city life. |
on the days the sun sets at five it's too cold to walk anyways. my kids' school is less than 10 minute walk from my home. it's very safe. yet during the winter i drive them. it's too cold and often windy and/or rainy. i am not sure there are many people anywhere (regardless of safety) who enjoy long walks during winter days. |