Little pink monster blog

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone see her IG post today about the domestic violence incident?

quote or c&p it please

Because I know what it’s like to make the decision to stand up and say what he did to you was wrong. To say NO, you can’t put your hands on me. I know what it’s like to have your voice break & tremble as you stand in a courtroom & recount every awful detail. To then have an attorney question every word, as if you are the one on trial. I know what it’s like to have it be decided that there “isn’t enough evidence to corroborate your story”, to hear someone else decide it did not happen. And I know what it’s like to watch as people who have never met you, shred you apart because they’ve decided you lied & are just trying to destroy a “good man”. I know what it’s like. I believe her because no one would take that nightmare on unless it was their truth. I #beleiveher Please #believesurvivors

That's all fine-and-dandy but like the judge says...the evidence doesn't support her. She didn't file a police report or go to the hospital. She didn't document the abuse. She is the documented drug abuser. She lost custody of her kids. She had lapses in judgement including not paying bills and crashing her car. But she's the victim now?

This is stupid - you don't get to cry DV after the entire legal system has ruled against you - the party that is the most likely to be awarded first.

Just a reminder of her drug days - Kane and Natasha were having troubles. He said that several months ago, he came home and found their new Audi in the grass. When he asked N about it, she said she was avoiding a treebranch. He did not see a treebranch outside but he said he forgot about it. The next day he had to take the gorls somewhere and when he popped the trunk, he found a large piece of plastic from the front side passenger tire area of the car. He pressed N for an answer and she said that she hit the rock wall in front of their house. They discussed why she lied privately, he did not disclose the extent of that conversation.

She probably lied because she was afraid of his reaction. You guys should read what she posted again. "To say NO, you can’t put your hands on me" is a pretty telling statement.

From the article, it sounds like she was trying to enter his apartment without his consent and he moved her out of the way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone see her IG post today about the domestic violence incident?

quote or c&p it please

Because I know what it’s like to make the decision to stand up and say what he did to you was wrong. To say NO, you can’t put your hands on me. I know what it’s like to have your voice break & tremble as you stand in a courtroom & recount every awful detail. To then have an attorney question every word, as if you are the one on trial. I know what it’s like to have it be decided that there “isn’t enough evidence to corroborate your story”, to hear someone else decide it did not happen. And I know what it’s like to watch as people who have never met you, shred you apart because they’ve decided you lied & are just trying to destroy a “good man”. I know what it’s like. I believe her because no one would take that nightmare on unless it was their truth. I #beleiveher Please #believesurvivors

That's all fine-and-dandy but like the judge says...the evidence doesn't support her. She didn't file a police report or go to the hospital. She didn't document the abuse. She is the documented drug abuser. She lost custody of her kids. She had lapses in judgement including not paying bills and crashing her car. But she's the victim now?

This is stupid - you don't get to cry DV after the entire legal system has ruled against you - the party that is the most likely to be awarded first.

Just a reminder of her drug days - Kane and Natasha were having troubles. He said that several months ago, he came home and found their new Audi in the grass. When he asked N about it, she said she was avoiding a treebranch. He did not see a treebranch outside but he said he forgot about it. The next day he had to take the gorls somewhere and when he popped the trunk, he found a large piece of plastic from the front side passenger tire area of the car. He pressed N for an answer and she said that she hit the rock wall in front of their house. They discussed why she lied privately, he did not disclose the extent of that conversation.

She probably lied because she was afraid of his reaction. You guys should read what she posted again. "To say NO, you can’t put your hands on me" is a pretty telling statement.

From the article, it sounds like she was trying to enter his apartment without his consent and he moved her out of the way.

Yeah I'm pretty sure that's what the judge ascertained as well. I remember reading about the judge saying something along the lines of "If the genders were reversed we would have ruled the same way. A man can't force his way in to a woman's apartment so neither can a woman force her way in to a man's." For her to take this instance of physical contact where SHE was pretty much confirmed to have been the aggressor and use it to paint herself as a victim of domestic violence is truly disturbing. She should quit while she's ahead and abandon her smear campaign because it's actually making me think Kane wasn't completely off base with some of his accusations about her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone see her IG post today about the domestic violence incident?

quote or c&p it please

Because I know what it’s like to make the decision to stand up and say what he did to you was wrong. To say NO, you can’t put your hands on me. I know what it’s like to have your voice break & tremble as you stand in a courtroom & recount every awful detail. To then have an attorney question every word, as if you are the one on trial. I know what it’s like to have it be decided that there “isn’t enough evidence to corroborate your story”, to hear someone else decide it did not happen. And I know what it’s like to watch as people who have never met you, shred you apart because they’ve decided you lied & are just trying to destroy a “good man”. I know what it’s like. I believe her because no one would take that nightmare on unless it was their truth. I #beleiveher Please #believesurvivors

That's all fine-and-dandy but like the judge says...the evidence doesn't support her. She didn't file a police report or go to the hospital. She didn't document the abuse. She is the documented drug abuser. She lost custody of her kids. She had lapses in judgement including not paying bills and crashing her car. But she's the victim now?

This is stupid - you don't get to cry DV after the entire legal system has ruled against you - the party that is the most likely to be awarded first.

Just a reminder of her drug days - Kane and Natasha were having troubles. He said that several months ago, he came home and found their new Audi in the grass. When he asked N about it, she said she was avoiding a treebranch. He did not see a treebranch outside but he said he forgot about it. The next day he had to take the gorls somewhere and when he popped the trunk, he found a large piece of plastic from the front side passenger tire area of the car. He pressed N for an answer and she said that she hit the rock wall in front of their house. They discussed why she lied privately, he did not disclose the extent of that conversation.

She probably lied because she was afraid of his reaction. You guys should read what she posted again. "To say NO, you can’t put your hands on me" is a pretty telling statement.

From the article, it sounds like she was trying to enter his apartment without his consent and he moved her out of the way.

Yeah I'm pretty sure that's what the judge ascertained as well. I remember reading about the judge saying something along the lines of "If the genders were reversed we would have ruled the same way. A man can't force his way in to a woman's apartment so neither can a woman force her way in to a man's." For her to take this instance of physical contact where SHE was pretty much confirmed to have been the aggressor and use it to paint herself as a victim of domestic violence is truly disturbing. She should quit while she's ahead and abandon her smear campaign because it's actually making me think Kane wasn't completely off base with some of his accusations about her.

Uh, maybe it happened more than in this one instance?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone see her IG post today about the domestic violence incident?

quote or c&p it please

Because I know what it’s like to make the decision to stand up and say what he did to you was wrong. To say NO, you can’t put your hands on me. I know what it’s like to have your voice break & tremble as you stand in a courtroom & recount every awful detail. To then have an attorney question every word, as if you are the one on trial. I know what it’s like to have it be decided that there “isn’t enough evidence to corroborate your story”, to hear someone else decide it did not happen. And I know what it’s like to watch as people who have never met you, shred you apart because they’ve decided you lied & are just trying to destroy a “good man”. I know what it’s like. I believe her because no one would take that nightmare on unless it was their truth. I #beleiveher Please #believesurvivors

That's all fine-and-dandy but like the judge says...the evidence doesn't support her. She didn't file a police report or go to the hospital. She didn't document the abuse. She is the documented drug abuser. She lost custody of her kids. She had lapses in judgement including not paying bills and crashing her car. But she's the victim now?

This is stupid - you don't get to cry DV after the entire legal system has ruled against you - the party that is the most likely to be awarded first.

Just a reminder of her drug days - Kane and Natasha were having troubles. He said that several months ago, he came home and found their new Audi in the grass. When he asked N about it, she said she was avoiding a treebranch. He did not see a treebranch outside but he said he forgot about it. The next day he had to take the gorls somewhere and when he popped the trunk, he found a large piece of plastic from the front side passenger tire area of the car. He pressed N for an answer and she said that she hit the rock wall in front of their house. They discussed why she lied privately, he did not disclose the extent of that conversation.

She probably lied because she was afraid of his reaction. You guys should read what she posted again. "To say NO, you can’t put your hands on me" is a pretty telling statement.

It would be TELLING if she said "He gave me a black eye" or "Here's my fractured wrist" or "Bruises on my shin because I 'fell' down the stairs".

She is using the vaguest terms so he can't sue her for defamatory libel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone see her IG post today about the domestic violence incident?

quote or c&p it please

Because I know what it’s like to make the decision to stand up and say what he did to you was wrong. To say NO, you can’t put your hands on me. I know what it’s like to have your voice break & tremble as you stand in a courtroom & recount every awful detail. To then have an attorney question every word, as if you are the one on trial. I know what it’s like to have it be decided that there “isn’t enough evidence to corroborate your story”, to hear someone else decide it did not happen. And I know what it’s like to watch as people who have never met you, shred you apart because they’ve decided you lied & are just trying to destroy a “good man”. I know what it’s like. I believe her because no one would take that nightmare on unless it was their truth. I #beleiveher Please #believesurvivors

That's all fine-and-dandy but like the judge says...the evidence doesn't support her. She didn't file a police report or go to the hospital. She didn't document the abuse. She is the documented drug abuser. She lost custody of her kids. She had lapses in judgement including not paying bills and crashing her car. But she's the victim now?

This is stupid - you don't get to cry DV after the entire legal system has ruled against you - the party that is the most likely to be awarded first.

Just a reminder of her drug days - Kane and Natasha were having troubles. He said that several months ago, he came home and found their new Audi in the grass. When he asked N about it, she said she was avoiding a treebranch. He did not see a treebranch outside but he said he forgot about it. The next day he had to take the gorls somewhere and when he popped the trunk, he found a large piece of plastic from the front side passenger tire area of the car. He pressed N for an answer and she said that she hit the rock wall in front of their house. They discussed why she lied privately, he did not disclose the extent of that conversation.

She probably lied because she was afraid of his reaction. You guys should read what she posted again. "To say NO, you can’t put your hands on me" is a pretty telling statement.

It would be TELLING if she said "He gave me a black eye" or "Here's my fractured wrist" or "Bruises on my shin because I 'fell' down the stairs".

She is using the vaguest terms so he can't sue her for defamatory libel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone see her IG post today about the domestic violence incident?

quote or c&p it please

Because I know what it’s like to make the decision to stand up and say what he did to you was wrong. To say NO, you can’t put your hands on me. I know what it’s like to have your voice break & tremble as you stand in a courtroom & recount every awful detail. To then have an attorney question every word, as if you are the one on trial. I know what it’s like to have it be decided that there “isn’t enough evidence to corroborate your story”, to hear someone else decide it did not happen. And I know what it’s like to watch as people who have never met you, shred you apart because they’ve decided you lied & are just trying to destroy a “good man”. I know what it’s like. I believe her because no one would take that nightmare on unless it was their truth. I #beleiveher Please #believesurvivors

That's all fine-and-dandy but like the judge says...the evidence doesn't support her. She didn't file a police report or go to the hospital. She didn't document the abuse. She is the documented drug abuser. She lost custody of her kids. She had lapses in judgement including not paying bills and crashing her car. But she's the victim now?

This is stupid - you don't get to cry DV after the entire legal system has ruled against you - the party that is the most likely to be awarded first.

Just a reminder of her drug days - Kane and Natasha were having troubles. He said that several months ago, he came home and found their new Audi in the grass. When he asked N about it, she said she was avoiding a treebranch. He did not see a treebranch outside but he said he forgot about it. The next day he had to take the gorls somewhere and when he popped the trunk, he found a large piece of plastic from the front side passenger tire area of the car. He pressed N for an answer and she said that she hit the rock wall in front of their house. They discussed why she lied privately, he did not disclose the extent of that conversation.

She probably lied because she was afraid of his reaction. You guys should read what she posted again. "To say NO, you can’t put your hands on me" is a pretty telling statement.

From the article, it sounds like she was trying to enter his apartment without his consent and he moved her out of the way.

Yeah I'm pretty sure that's what the judge ascertained as well. I remember reading about the judge saying something along the lines of "If the genders were reversed we would have ruled the same way. A man can't force his way in to a woman's apartment so neither can a woman force her way in to a man's." For her to take this instance of physical contact where SHE was pretty much confirmed to have been the aggressor and use it to paint herself as a victim of domestic violence is truly disturbing. She should quit while she's ahead and abandon her smear campaign because it's actually making me think Kane wasn't completely off base with some of his accusations about her.

Kane took a bath on their former extravagant home, and is likely paying through the nose in child/ex-wife support, but at some point, getting rid of the crazy is worth it - it is really starting to show, like an above poster said. He went rogue that one time on air, but then has seemed to STFU about the whole thing since.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone see her IG post today about the domestic violence incident?

quote or c&p it please

Because I know what it’s like to make the decision to stand up and say what he did to you was wrong. To say NO, you can’t put your hands on me. I know what it’s like to have your voice break & tremble as you stand in a courtroom & recount every awful detail. To then have an attorney question every word, as if you are the one on trial. I know what it’s like to have it be decided that there “isn’t enough evidence to corroborate your story”, to hear someone else decide it did not happen. And I know what it’s like to watch as people who have never met you, shred you apart because they’ve decided you lied & are just trying to destroy a “good man”. I know what it’s like. I believe her because no one would take that nightmare on unless it was their truth. I #beleiveher Please #believesurvivors

That's all fine-and-dandy but like the judge says...the evidence doesn't support her. She didn't file a police report or go to the hospital. She didn't document the abuse. She is the documented drug abuser. She lost custody of her kids. She had lapses in judgement including not paying bills and crashing her car. But she's the victim now?

This is stupid - you don't get to cry DV after the entire legal system has ruled against you - the party that is the most likely to be awarded first.

Just a reminder of her drug days - Kane and Natasha were having troubles. He said that several months ago, he came home and found their new Audi in the grass. When he asked N about it, she said she was avoiding a treebranch. He did not see a treebranch outside but he said he forgot about it. The next day he had to take the gorls somewhere and when he popped the trunk, he found a large piece of plastic from the front side passenger tire area of the car. He pressed N for an answer and she said that she hit the rock wall in front of their house. They discussed why she lied privately, he did not disclose the extent of that conversation.

She probably lied because she was afraid of his reaction. You guys should read what she posted again. "To say NO, you can’t put your hands on me" is a pretty telling statement.

From the article, it sounds like she was trying to enter his apartment without his consent and he moved her out of the way.

Yeah I'm pretty sure that's what the judge ascertained as well. I remember reading about the judge saying something along the lines of "If the genders were reversed we would have ruled the same way. A man can't force his way in to a woman's apartment so neither can a woman force her way in to a man's." For her to take this instance of physical contact where SHE was pretty much confirmed to have been the aggressor and use it to paint herself as a victim of domestic violence is truly disturbing. She should quit while she's ahead and abandon her smear campaign because it's actually making me think Kane wasn't completely off base with some of his accusations about her.

Kane took a bath on their former extravagant home, and is likely paying through the nose in child/ex-wife support, but at some point, getting rid of the crazy is worth it - it is really starting to show, like an above poster said. He went rogue that one time on air, but then has seemed to STFU about the whole thing since.

I imagine his employer had a lot to do with that. It's no secret he lost a lot of fans through all of this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone see her IG post today about the domestic violence incident?

quote or c&p it please

Because I know what it’s like to make the decision to stand up and say what he did to you was wrong. To say NO, you can’t put your hands on me. I know what it’s like to have your voice break & tremble as you stand in a courtroom & recount every awful detail. To then have an attorney question every word, as if you are the one on trial. I know what it’s like to have it be decided that there “isn’t enough evidence to corroborate your story”, to hear someone else decide it did not happen. And I know what it’s like to watch as people who have never met you, shred you apart because they’ve decided you lied & are just trying to destroy a “good man”. I know what it’s like. I believe her because no one would take that nightmare on unless it was their truth. I #beleiveher Please #believesurvivors

That's all fine-and-dandy but like the judge says...the evidence doesn't support her. She didn't file a police report or go to the hospital. She didn't document the abuse. She is the documented drug abuser. She lost custody of her kids. She had lapses in judgement including not paying bills and crashing her car. But she's the victim now?

This is stupid - you don't get to cry DV after the entire legal system has ruled against you - the party that is the most likely to be awarded first.

Just a reminder of her drug days - Kane and Natasha were having troubles. He said that several months ago, he came home and found their new Audi in the grass. When he asked N about it, she said she was avoiding a treebranch. He did not see a treebranch outside but he said he forgot about it. The next day he had to take the gorls somewhere and when he popped the trunk, he found a large piece of plastic from the front side passenger tire area of the car. He pressed N for an answer and she said that she hit the rock wall in front of their house. They discussed why she lied privately, he did not disclose the extent of that conversation.

She probably lied because she was afraid of his reaction. You guys should read what she posted again. "To say NO, you can’t put your hands on me" is a pretty telling statement.

From the article, it sounds like she was trying to enter his apartment without his consent and he moved her out of the way.

Yeah I'm pretty sure that's what the judge ascertained as well. I remember reading about the judge saying something along the lines of "If the genders were reversed we would have ruled the same way. A man can't force his way in to a woman's apartment so neither can a woman force her way in to a man's." For her to take this instance of physical contact where SHE was pretty much confirmed to have been the aggressor and use it to paint herself as a victim of domestic violence is truly disturbing. She should quit while she's ahead and abandon her smear campaign because it's actually making me think Kane wasn't completely off base with some of his accusations about her.

Uh, maybe it happened more than in this one instance?

+1000

But IJ and Kane and their minions are going to post 400 anti N messages to make it seem implausible. Too bad the public knows the truth and have dropped Kane like crazy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone see her IG post today about the domestic violence incident?

quote or c&p it please

Because I know what it’s like to make the decision to stand up and say what he did to you was wrong. To say NO, you can’t put your hands on me. I know what it’s like to have your voice break & tremble as you stand in a courtroom & recount every awful detail. To then have an attorney question every word, as if you are the one on trial. I know what it’s like to have it be decided that there “isn’t enough evidence to corroborate your story”, to hear someone else decide it did not happen. And I know what it’s like to watch as people who have never met you, shred you apart because they’ve decided you lied & are just trying to destroy a “good man”. I know what it’s like. I believe her because no one would take that nightmare on unless it was their truth. I #beleiveher Please #believesurvivors

That's all fine-and-dandy but like the judge says...the evidence doesn't support her. She didn't file a police report or go to the hospital. She didn't document the abuse. She is the documented drug abuser. She lost custody of her kids. She had lapses in judgement including not paying bills and crashing her car. But she's the victim now?

This is stupid - you don't get to cry DV after the entire legal system has ruled against you - the party that is the most likely to be awarded first.

Just a reminder of her drug days - Kane and Natasha were having troubles. He said that several months ago, he came home and found their new Audi in the grass. When he asked N about it, she said she was avoiding a treebranch. He did not see a treebranch outside but he said he forgot about it. The next day he had to take the gorls somewhere and when he popped the trunk, he found a large piece of plastic from the front side passenger tire area of the car. He pressed N for an answer and she said that she hit the rock wall in front of their house. They discussed why she lied privately, he did not disclose the extent of that conversation.

She probably lied because she was afraid of his reaction. You guys should read what she posted again. "To say NO, you can’t put your hands on me" is a pretty telling statement.

From the article, it sounds like she was trying to enter his apartment without his consent and he moved her out of the way.

Yeah I'm pretty sure that's what the judge ascertained as well. I remember reading about the judge saying something along the lines of "If the genders were reversed we would have ruled the same way. A man can't force his way in to a woman's apartment so neither can a woman force her way in to a man's." For her to take this instance of physical contact where SHE was pretty much confirmed to have been the aggressor and use it to paint herself as a victim of domestic violence is truly disturbing. She should quit while she's ahead and abandon her smear campaign because it's actually making me think Kane wasn't completely off base with some of his accusations about her.

Uh, maybe it happened more than in this one instance?

+1000

But IJ and Kane and their minions are going to post 400 anti N messages to make it seem implausible. Too bad the public knows the truth and have dropped Kane like crazy

I'm not IJ or Kane or one of their minions and I just don't think she's believable, but that's just me. I don't think you should assume everyone believes her. I mean are we supposed to believe her just because she says so or just because she's a woman? But we're not supposed to believe Kane when he says something when all legal evidence points to her not telling the truth?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone see her IG post today about the domestic violence incident?

quote or c&p it please

Because I know what it’s like to make the decision to stand up and say what he did to you was wrong. To say NO, you can’t put your hands on me. I know what it’s like to have your voice break & tremble as you stand in a courtroom & recount every awful detail. To then have an attorney question every word, as if you are the one on trial. I know what it’s like to have it be decided that there “isn’t enough evidence to corroborate your story”, to hear someone else decide it did not happen. And I know what it’s like to watch as people who have never met you, shred you apart because they’ve decided you lied & are just trying to destroy a “good man”. I know what it’s like. I believe her because no one would take that nightmare on unless it was their truth. I #beleiveher Please #believesurvivors

That's all fine-and-dandy but like the judge says...the evidence doesn't support her. She didn't file a police report or go to the hospital. She didn't document the abuse. She is the documented drug abuser. She lost custody of her kids. She had lapses in judgement including not paying bills and crashing her car. But she's the victim now?

This is stupid - you don't get to cry DV after the entire legal system has ruled against you - the party that is the most likely to be awarded first.

Just a reminder of her drug days - Kane and Natasha were having troubles. He said that several months ago, he came home and found their new Audi in the grass. When he asked N about it, she said she was avoiding a treebranch. He did not see a treebranch outside but he said he forgot about it. The next day he had to take the gorls somewhere and when he popped the trunk, he found a large piece of plastic from the front side passenger tire area of the car. He pressed N for an answer and she said that she hit the rock wall in front of their house. They discussed why she lied privately, he did not disclose the extent of that conversation.

She probably lied because she was afraid of his reaction. You guys should read what she posted again. "To say NO, you can’t put your hands on me" is a pretty telling statement.

From the article, it sounds like she was trying to enter his apartment without his consent and he moved her out of the way.

Yeah I'm pretty sure that's what the judge ascertained as well. I remember reading about the judge saying something along the lines of "If the genders were reversed we would have ruled the same way. A man can't force his way in to a woman's apartment so neither can a woman force her way in to a man's." For her to take this instance of physical contact where SHE was pretty much confirmed to have been the aggressor and use it to paint herself as a victim of domestic violence is truly disturbing. She should quit while she's ahead and abandon her smear campaign because it's actually making me think Kane wasn't completely off base with some of his accusations about her.

Uh, maybe it happened more than in this one instance?

+1000

But IJ and Kane and their minions are going to post 400 anti N messages to make it seem implausible. Too bad the public knows the truth and have dropped Kane like crazy

I'm not IJ or Kane or one of their minions and I just don't think she's believable, but that's just me. I don't think you should assume everyone believes her. I mean are we supposed to believe her just because she says so or just because she's a woman? But we're not supposed to believe Kane when he says something when all legal evidence points to her not telling the truth?

What legal evidence? Or just the hearsay posted here?

[Anonymous]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/reliable-source/wp/2016/06/30/judge-wont-extend-protective-order-against-kane-show-host/?utm_term=.1e78594e95fc

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone see her IG post today about the domestic violence incident?

quote or c&p it please

Because I know what it’s like to make the decision to stand up and say what he did to you was wrong. To say NO, you can’t put your hands on me. I know what it’s like to have your voice break & tremble as you stand in a courtroom & recount every awful detail. To then have an attorney question every word, as if you are the one on trial. I know what it’s like to have it be decided that there “isn’t enough evidence to corroborate your story”, to hear someone else decide it did not happen. And I know what it’s like to watch as people who have never met you, shred you apart because they’ve decided you lied & are just trying to destroy a “good man”. I know what it’s like. I believe her because no one would take that nightmare on unless it was their truth. I #beleiveher Please #believesurvivors

That's all fine-and-dandy but like the judge says...the evidence doesn't support her. She didn't file a police report or go to the hospital. She didn't document the abuse. She is the documented drug abuser. She lost custody of her kids. She had lapses in judgement including not paying bills and crashing her car. But she's the victim now?

This is stupid - you don't get to cry DV after the entire legal system has ruled against you - the party that is the most likely to be awarded first.

Just a reminder of her drug days - Kane and Natasha were having troubles. He said that several months ago, he came home and found their new Audi in the grass. When he asked N about it, she said she was avoiding a treebranch. He did not see a treebranch outside but he said he forgot about it. The next day he had to take the gorls somewhere and when he popped the trunk, he found a large piece of plastic from the front side passenger tire area of the car. He pressed N for an answer and she said that she hit the rock wall in front of their house. They discussed why she lied privately, he did not disclose the extent of that conversation.

She probably lied because she was afraid of his reaction. You guys should read what she posted again. "To say NO, you can’t put your hands on me" is a pretty telling statement.

From the article, it sounds like she was trying to enter his apartment without his consent and he moved her out of the way.

Yeah I'm pretty sure that's what the judge ascertained as well. I remember reading about the judge saying something along the lines of "If the genders were reversed we would have ruled the same way. A man can't force his way in to a woman's apartment so neither can a woman force her way in to a man's." For her to take this instance of physical contact where SHE was pretty much confirmed to have been the aggressor and use it to paint herself as a victim of domestic violence is truly disturbing. She should quit while she's ahead and abandon her smear campaign because it's actually making me think Kane wasn't completely off base with some of his accusations about her.

Uh, maybe it happened more than in this one instance?

+1000

But IJ and Kane and their minions are going to post 400 anti N messages to make it seem implausible. Too bad the public knows the truth and have dropped Kane like crazy

I'm not IJ or Kane or one of their minions and I just don't think she's believable, but that's just me. I don't think you should assume everyone believes her. I mean are we supposed to believe her just because she says so or just because she's a woman? But we're not supposed to believe Kane when he says something when all legal evidence points to her not telling the truth?

What legal evidence? Or just the hearsay posted here?

The court proceedings where she was sent into rehab.
NP

[Anonymous]

^ I posted the article above. I do not approve of how Kane handled the divorce on his end by crying on the radio. Even if everything he said is true, he should’ve kept it private for the sake of his children. Likewise, Natasha should not be posting about her divorce or her ex or alluding to abuse.

If you read that article, the only one in this relationship that is 100% documented unstable is Natasha. If kane had come to her home and angrily banged on the door, yelling to be let inside knowing his kids could hear, then tried to force his way in the doorway shoving past her, he would have been fired and publicly shamed.

I hope Natasha gets this through her head: the more you post about your divorce and your ex, the more bitter bad crazy you appear to your critics. You don’t come across as a woman empowered. If anything, the fact that you only resurfaced after safely securing another husband (!) is just sad. Just post your crafts and recipes. Don’t give your daughters even more horrific material that their friends can google in a few years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:^ I posted the article above. I do not approve of how Kane handled the divorce on his end by crying on the radio. Even if everything he said is true, he should’ve kept it private for the sake of his children. Likewise, Natasha should not be posting about her divorce or her ex or alluding to abuse.

If you read that article, the only one in this relationship that is 100% documented unstable is Natasha. If kane had come to her home and angrily banged on the door, yelling to be let inside knowing his kids could hear, then tried to force his way in the doorway shoving past her, he would have been fired and publicly shamed.

I hope Natasha gets this through her head: the more you post about your divorce and your ex, the more bitter bad crazy you appear to your critics. You don’t come across as a woman empowered. If anything, the fact that you only resurfaced after safely securing another husband (!) is just sad. Just post your crafts and recipes. Don’t give your daughters even more horrific material that their friends can google in a few years.

Lol I hate to admit it but I thought the same thing. She took time to rest and heal and, oh yeah, lock down another guy so she can wiggle out of working for another 10 years

[Anonymous]

Kane is just as mental: OCD. He probably drove N mad.