Why is Hilary "evil"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It really boils down to the fact that she personally participated in the intentional and deliberate targeting of women who had already been sexually assaulted by her own husband.

She was (and is) too ugly for him to have sex with, so he went after other women.

Some of them were flattered and others were assaulted. In both cases, Hillary slammed them.

She's simply a horrible human being.

The best part is you are literally too stupid to even detect the glaring irony in your post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because she is so hungry for the power of the presidency that she is will to do anything or say anything to get it. She will take any position or lie to anyone if it increases her chances of being elected president.

This applies equally to Trump and most politicians of course.

If you hold this view, how do you ever vote for anyone, for any position?

To me Obama seemed to actually have some deeply held beliefs and wanted to try to make the world a better place. I certain disagree with some of those beliefs or the methods by which he tried to obtain them, but with Hillary I don't actually have any idea what her true beliefs are. I don't even know if she has any, I think that she really just wants power for its own sake. To me this is the true evil.

I don't understand how you can say this? She has worked tirelessly for health care reform, for women and girls concerns around the world, and more. Here is a PBS biography of her that pre-dates her current run. PBS seems like a neutral source. It opens:

"A tough and pragmatic leader, outspoken advocate for social justice and women's rights, and resilient and intelligent politician, Hillary Rodham Clinton has achieved many "firsts" in her roles as First Lady of the United States, U.S. Senator, presidential candidate, and Secretary of State. As she put it in her 2003 memoir Living History, "My mother and my grandmothers could never have lived my life; my father and my grandfathers could never have imagined it. But they bestowed on me the promise of America, which made my life and my choices possible."

The whole thing: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/biography/clinton-hillary/

Besides healthcare reform (dubbed "HillaryCare") in the first term, her second term as first lady had the following focus areas:

"During Bill's second term, Hillary cultivated a more traditional profile. She continued to focus on health and welfare issues, especially those involving children, and in 1997, supported the passage and rollout of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), which expanded health insurance for children in lower-income families. She was instrumental in the enactment of the Adoption and Safe Families Act, legislation that eased the removal of children from abusive situations.

Hillary helped create the Department of Justice's Office on Violence Against Women in 1994, and during her travels to more than 80 countries she was a forceful advocate for women's rights. In 1995, during an unprecedented address in Beijing to the United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women, Hillary recounted worldwide abuses and declared "It is time for us to say here in Beijing, and for the world to hear, that it is no longer acceptable to discuss women's rights as separate from human rights."

Her beliefs and priorities - social justice, health care form, and equal rights for women and girls come through.

That's all generic. Those women are hypothetical. When it came to the actual women whom her husband assaulted and raped and generally abused, she did nothing to defend them.

You don't get to do that and still pretend you are a feminist.

You don't get to say a woman's husband allegedly sexually assaulted other women because his wife was too ugly to have sex with and call YOURSELF a feminist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still no explanation from anyone what they mean by "Benghazi" other than "Benghazi." Can someone please explain.

OP here. I want to know too. Also, why do people care so much that her husband cheated on her. It doesn't have anything to do with her ability to be president. Calling her evil seems overly dramatic. Like in my original post, evil people (mostly men) are those who have committed great atrocities against humanity (Hitler, etc.) and since when does having ambition make a person evil?

I don't think that they care that her husband cheated on her. I think that they find that vindicating because she is an outspoken woman who they wanted to hate anyway. That her husband is a cheater just reinforces their image of her as an unwanted annoyance. The only reason they can come up with that a person would stay married to someone who (they believe) sees her that way is that she must be ambitious and using him for a political lift.

So:

- unattractive/not sexually desired
- ambitious

I do not understand the "EVIL" argument. I know that there are people who believe she is dishonest (I don't) and opportunistic (I do, but I don't care and don't think that her opportunism is different from anyone else's). I know that there are people who think that she's cold, who don't like the sound of her voice, who don't think she's feminine enough. I don't understand how any of that adds up to EVIL, though. It is totally overly dramatic.

You already had it figured out. She is an unwanted annoyance. If her own husband can't stand her, the idea of inflicting her on 350 million Americans, or 6 billion world citizens is a crime against humanity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It really boils down to the fact that she personally participated in the intentional and deliberate targeting of women who had already been sexually assaulted by her own husband.

She was (and is) too ugly for him to have sex with, so he went after other women.

Some of them were flattered and others were assaulted. In both cases, Hillary slammed them.

She's simply a horrible human being.

You've bought into a fiction because it suits your misogyny. You're blaming her for being ugly? How stupid. There was no rape, no sexual assault. Lord knows the republicans have spent hundreds of millions of tax dollars trying to prove there were. They would have proven them if they could.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Still no explanation from anyone what they mean by "Benghazi" other than "Benghazi." Can someone please explain.

OP here. I want to know too. Also, why do people care so much that her husband cheated on her. It doesn't have anything to do with her ability to be president. Calling her evil seems overly dramatic. Like in my original post, evil people (mostly men) are those who have committed great atrocities against humanity (Hitler, etc.) and since when does having ambition make a person evil?

I don't think that they care that her husband cheated on her. I think that they find that vindicating because she is an outspoken woman who they wanted to hate anyway. That her husband is a cheater just reinforces their image of her as an unwanted annoyance. The only reason they can come up with that a person would stay married to someone who (they believe) sees her that way is that she must be ambitious and using him for a political lift.

So:

- unattractive/not sexually desired
- ambitious

I do not understand the "EVIL" argument. I know that there are people who believe she is dishonest (I don't) and opportunistic (I do, but I don't care and don't think that her opportunism is different from anyone else's). I know that there are people who think that she's cold, who don't like the sound of her voice, who don't think she's feminine enough. I don't understand how any of that adds up to EVIL, though. It is totally overly dramatic.

You already had it figured out. She is an unwanted annoyance. If her own husband can't stand her, the idea of inflicting her on 350 million Americans, or 6 billion world citizens is a crime against humanity.

Yes. pp did figure you out. You hate women. We get it. Some day you'll die and the world will be better for it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It really boils down to the fact that she personally participated in the intentional and deliberate targeting of women who had already been sexually assaulted by her own husband.

She was (and is) too ugly for him to have sex with, so he went after other women.

Some of them were flattered and others were assaulted. In both cases, Hillary slammed them.

She's simply a horrible human being.

Let's note what you are saying here: It's not just that she slammed those women that upsets you. It's also her fault that Bill Clinton was with those women in the first place, because she's so ugly.

Got it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It really boils down to the fact that she personally participated in the intentional and deliberate targeting of women who had already been sexually assaulted by her own husband.

She was (and is) too ugly for him to have sex with, so he went after other women.

Some of them were flattered and others were assaulted. In both cases, Hillary slammed them.

She's simply a horrible human being.

Let's note what you are saying here: It's not just that she slammed those women that upsets you. It's also her fault that Bill Clinton was with those women in the first place, because she's so ugly.

Got it.

Yes,
If Hillary weren't so ugly, her husband wouldn't allegedly assault other women

You people are vile.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It really boils down to the fact that she personally participated in the intentional and deliberate targeting of women who had already been sexually assaulted by her own husband.

She was (and is) too ugly for him to have sex with, so he went after other women.

Some of them were flattered and others were assaulted. In both cases, Hillary slammed them.

She's simply a horrible human being.

Let's note what you are saying here: It's not just that she slammed those women that upsets you. It's also her fault that Bill Clinton was with those women in the first place, because she's so ugly.

Got it.

I feel like getting this PP to write his/her post and out himself/herself as a misogynist was a win in the DCUM land (at least for us sane and rational posters)!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It really boils down to the fact that she personally participated in the intentional and deliberate targeting of women who had already been sexually assaulted by her own husband.

She was (and is) too ugly for him to have sex with, so he went after other women.

Some of them were flattered and others were assaulted. In both cases, Hillary slammed them.

She's simply a horrible human being.

The best part is you are literally too stupid to even detect the glaring irony in your post.

Please spell it out. Please explain how a woman can defend a rapist in the name of feminism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It really boils down to the fact that she personally participated in the intentional and deliberate targeting of women who had already been sexually assaulted by her own husband.

She was (and is) too ugly for him to have sex with, so he went after other women.

Some of them were flattered and others were assaulted. In both cases, Hillary slammed them.

She's simply a horrible human being.

You've bought into a fiction because it suits your misogyny. You're blaming her for being ugly? How stupid. There was no rape, no sexual assault. Lord knows the republicans have spent hundreds of millions of tax dollars trying to prove there were. They would have proven them if they could.

Paula Jones wasn't making it up to suit a Republican narrative.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It really boils down to the fact that she personally participated in the intentional and deliberate targeting of women who had already been sexually assaulted by her own husband.

She was (and is) too ugly for him to have sex with, so he went after other women.

Some of them were flattered and others were assaulted. In both cases, Hillary slammed them.

She's simply a horrible human being.

Let's note what you are saying here: It's not just that she slammed those women that upsets you. It's also her fault that Bill Clinton was with those women in the first place, because she's so ugly.

Got it.

I feel like getting this PP to write his/her post and out himself/herself as a misogynist was a win in the DCUM land (at least for us sane and rational posters)!

Definitely. We can only hope that the PP can do a little self-reflection.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It really boils down to the fact that she personally participated in the intentional and deliberate targeting of women who had already been sexually assaulted by her own husband.

She was (and is) too ugly for him to have sex with, so he went after other women.

Some of them were flattered and others were assaulted. In both cases, Hillary slammed them.

She's simply a horrible human being.

You've bought into a fiction because it suits your misogyny. You're blaming her for being ugly? How stupid. There was no rape, no sexual assault. Lord knows the republicans have spent hundreds of millions of tax dollars trying to prove there were. They would have proven them if they could.

Paula Jones wasn't making it up to suit a Republican narrative.

Really now. They did pay her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It really boils down to the fact that she personally participated in the intentional and deliberate targeting of women who had already been sexually assaulted by her own husband.

She was (and is) too ugly for him to have sex with, so he went after other women.

Some of them were flattered and others were assaulted. In both cases, Hillary slammed them.

She's simply a horrible human being.

The best part is you are literally too stupid to even detect the glaring irony in your post.

Unlike you who is stupid enough. LOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It really boils down to the fact that she personally participated in the intentional and deliberate targeting of women who had already been sexually assaulted by her own husband.

She was (and is) too ugly for him to have sex with, so he went after other women.

Some of them were flattered and others were assaulted. In both cases, Hillary slammed them.

She's simply a horrible human being.

The best part is you are literally too stupid to even detect the glaring irony in your post.

Unlike you who is stupid enough. LOL

This has got to be a troll with a comeback like this. Just like Trump is trolling us all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is a serious answer, and I mean it genuinely. Read what she did to Juanita Broaddrick and Paula Jones.

(And definitely do this before you start crying about the next Brock Turner incident.)

This.