Who did you think killed JonBenet?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I always thought it was a family member, but that it was accidental.

Me too and my money is on the boy who was, I think 10 at the time. Accidental fall down stairs and then cover up?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When Natalee Holloway's mother dated John Ramsey, I wonder if she ever found out that the parents were involved and that's why their relationship ended?

No. If she had anything concrete about the Ramseys she would have/would said something.

How do you know for certain?

Natalie Holloway's mom has never been under a veil of suspicion like the Ramsey family has been under because it has been clear from the get go that she was nowhere near her daughter when her daughter disappeared and Natalie's disappearance while out clubbing has always suggested stranger involvement. I would think that any parent who had their child disappear into thin air like that would feel a duty to report any strong suspicions that they might have about another child's murder.

I mean, how could you not report it if you thought that someone you knew was involved in the murder of a 6 year old child? That is more than just "break up" material, IMO.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I always thought it was a family member, but that it was accidental.

Me too and my money is on the boy who was, I think 10 at the time. Accidental fall down stairs and then cover up?

But JonBenet's cause of death was the head injury AND strangulation....

If it was an accident like a fall down the steps why not call 911? Why wait and watch and then strangle....and cover it up? I think that someone must have caused the head wound in order to feel the need for this cover up.

The whole thing is horrible and makes no sense. I do not think that a 9 year old boy did that to his sister's head though. So that leaves the parents or some stranger in the basement.

[Anonymous]

I know the family. No way they did it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When Natalee Holloway's mother dated John Ramsey, I wonder if she ever found out that the parents were involved and that's why their relationship ended?

No. If she had anything concrete about the Ramseys she would have/would said something.

How do you know for certain?

Natalie Holloway's mom has never been under a veil of suspicion like the Ramsey family has been under because it has been clear from the get go that she was nowhere near her daughter when her daughter disappeared and Natalie's disappearance while out clubbing has always suggested stranger involvement. I would think that any parent who had their child disappear into thin air like that would feel a duty to report any strong suspicions that they might have about another child's murder.

I mean, how could you not report it if you thought that someone you knew was involved in the murder of a 6 year old child? That is more than just "break up" material, IMO.

I agree - I was the one who posted earlier that I don't get how whichever family members weren't involved (assuming one of them did it) could cover it up if another one did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I know the family. No way they did it.

ok. so who did? why no footprints?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know the family. No way they did it.

ok. so who did? why no footprints?

Obviously no one knows. This isn't the first murder where they don't have a suspect. Doesn't mean the parents did it. The parents were too successful and well off to have murdered their own child. They parents didn't have any motive and they could have paid someone to take care of her and then eventually sent to boarding school if they wanted to get rid of her.

[Anonymous]

I would like the mystery to be solved of Relisha Rudd - where is her body?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know the family. No way they did it.

ok. so who did? why no footprints?

Obviously no one knows. This isn't the first murder where they don't have a suspect. Doesn't mean the parents did it. The parents were too successful and well off to have murdered their own child. They parents didn't have any motive and they could have paid someone to take care of her and then eventually sent to boarding school if they wanted to get rid of her.

Isn't it generally thought that if they killed her it was an accident?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I know the family. No way they did it.

I'm sure that speculation like this is hard to hear if the Ramseys are your friends. I don't know them but I have seen this story on the news for the past 20 years. I'm sure that they are very personable people. But quite honestly something about Patsy Ramsey set my radar off from day one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know the family. No way they did it.

ok. so who did? why no footprints?

Obviously no one knows. This isn't the first murder where they don't have a suspect. Doesn't mean the parents did it. The parents were too successful and well off to have murdered their own child. They parents didn't have any motive and they could have paid someone to take care of her and then eventually sent to boarding school if they wanted to get rid of her.

Isn't it generally thought that if they killed her it was an accident?

I think it would be hard to argue accidental strangulation....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When Natalee Holloway's mother dated John Ramsey, I wonder if she ever found out that the parents were involved and that's why their relationship ended?

No. If she had anything concrete about the Ramseys she would have/would said something.

How do you know for certain?

Natalie Holloway's mom has never been under a veil of suspicion like the Ramsey family has been under because it has been clear from the get go that she was nowhere near her daughter when her daughter disappeared and Natalie's disappearance while out clubbing has always suggested stranger involvement. I would think that any parent who had their child disappear into thin air like that would feel a duty to report any strong suspicions that they might have about another child's murder.

I mean, how could you not report it if you thought that someone you knew was involved in the murder of a 6 year old child? That is more than just "break up" material, IMO.

I mostly agree. However, if it was the dead wife, I don't know. I could see feeling like there was no point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I know the family. No way they did it.

Sorry, no one truly knows their friends that well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know the family. No way they did it.

ok. so who did? why no footprints?

Obviously no one knows. This isn't the first murder where they don't have a suspect. Doesn't mean the parents did it. The parents were too successful and well off to have murdered their own child. They parents didn't have any motive and they could have paid someone to take care of her and then eventually sent to boarding school if they wanted to get rid of her.

What? Are you seriously trying to imply that rich people never commit crimes?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know the family. No way they did it.

ok. so who did? why no footprints?

Obviously no one knows. This isn't the first murder where they don't have a suspect. Doesn't mean the parents did it. The parents were too successful and well off to have murdered their own child. They parents didn't have any motive and they could have paid someone to take care of her and then eventually sent to boarding school if they wanted to get rid of her.

Isn't it generally thought that if they killed her it was an accident?

I think it would be hard to argue accidental strangulation....

That the initial injury was an accident, maybe they thought she was dead .. Don't know details, some possibilities are upthread.