I have no doubt they're easy to find. Lots of demand for them from people like you. |
| You forgot hats ... no baseball caps in school. |
Or lots of people wearing them getting caught on the do not wear blogs. I'm sure you and your teen daughter have a matching pair. Congrats. You won mom of the year. |
| For what it's worth, a male friend works as a substitute teacher/professor at a variety of levels, including college, and says that the leggings situation is out of control. Some leave nothing to imagine and that he - nice Catholic boy - would wish the girls would not dress that way. He feels he is professional, but they are not. They also create a problem for the male students. |
How exactly is the 'leggings situation' out of control? What are the measurable effects of the 'situation.' And what problem do they create for male classmates that those boys won't have to deal with outside of school? |
|
Leggings were designed to be worn instead of tights under a dress/tunic/skirt
They last longer than tights and are warmer than tights. This is how they should be worn. You wouldnt wear a pair of tights with a shirt that only comes to the waist top so dont do it with leggings. |
As a teacher, I wear leggings all the time - under a tunic or dress, often with boots. I would never teach class in form fitting leggings and a short top. I will also tell you these girls have zero to burgeoning body awareness and that's fine. I usually see utter cluelessness from.kids at this age in their fashion choices. It's much more about what parents allow/dont allow than about their fragile self images or perceived body shaming. This sounds much more like your issue than your daughters, though now you've made it hers . Since parents will obviously allow a spectrum of clothing, it's fine - actually desirable - for a school to set a standard. Dress codes are never perfect and hopefully the school will treat it discipline wise as a community 'goal' ( ie gentle reminders, not suspensions) . It's amazing how few parents understand that dress guidelines take the pressure off, rather than put it on. There is ample time outside of school for your kids sartorial splendor to shine. Take heart.
|
| If someone came to school in see-through leggings, I am pretty sure the same of her peers would take care of it. |
| of course it's sexist. so are most of the disgraceful posts in this thread. may none of you have daughters. |
So you'd like ' peer justice' in middle.school, rather than the adults setting the norm? Wow, just wow. How about when the peers encourage smoking? That cool.too? |
Well now that I understand how a 12-year-old wearing leggings could affect a nice catholic boy I'm sold! SMH |
So the goal of school now is that kids 'deal' with everything they would need to deal with out of school? So are you OK with cussing in halls and cussing out each other/adults? How about a little dice on the playground? Or does the desire for 'no rules' and 'real life' scenarios only apply to your daughter/leggings? I hope they have a rule about kids pulling up their pants as well. Despite the fact that it's delightfully funny to watch the Deal/Wilson students try to make a light while holding up their pants with one hand--no one should have to look at anyone's undies in the classroom. |
New poster. +1000 Thank you for some common sense in this thread. All of these "don't slut shame posts" are so ridiculous, for two reasons. First, you talk as if there is no limit to what you would allow students to wear in middle school. That slut-positive rhetoric is applicable to adults walking around in public. We are talking about students at school here. If an adult woman wants to walk around topless in one of the cities where it is legal, I salute her. If a middle schooler does it at school, I tell her to put a shirt on. Second, since you are trying so hard to be feminist, you should do some reading on how fashion choices can be both feminist and non feminist depending on the situation. Just because a middle school girl is making her own choice to wear tight revealing clothing, doesn't mean that allowing her the choice is feminist. You are her parent. You have to consider the peer pressure and other pressures that she feels. Here's a start, a comic that explains it better than I could: http://everydayfeminism.com/2015/07/choices-not-always-feminist/ |
|
I'm just laughing so hard...
Let's load the poor Deal administration up with our bodyshaming thesis right at the year start. great beginnings! nothing else to prioritize! DC parent 'we know better' backseat drivers! |
|
I love the name-calling among people who disagree with those who are uncomfortable with the policy.
You've said: --stupid --not good at feminism --bad parents --ridiculous --didn't use liberal arts education well --hope you don't have daughters --backseat drivers. And also claimed that we must support booty shorts, transparent pants, and visible thongs. You've claimed that we have no other priorities and that people who dress differently than you allow look "whorish." You've claimed that people who oppose the policy have planted this idea in their daughter's minds and thus created the problem. You've claimed we're encouraging them to hate the rules. In fact the OP wrote that she did NOT plan to bring it up with the administration and that her daughter expressed a concern on her own. But you've ignored that. It's one thing to disagree and another to insult people for their point of view. Fortunately the people you are insulting are, in fact, quite capable of parenting our daughters. We're capable of helping them present themselves in a dignified manner while in leggings. We're capable of instilling and maintaining respect for rules. We're capable of distinguishing between booty shorts and standard Lands End and Children's Place apparel. We're not stupid. We're capable of supporting our school administrations even when we disagree with certain policies. In short, we do not need to be scolded. |