Nice try? The problem with this logic is that the rights WERE taken away a couple of years ago, from the cluster parents, not from the people who currently live across the street who never had rights to the school. Which, for the record, was always an opt-in program and not a by-rights school. I have noticed DC has IB attendance rights, and I wonder at the many ways LT (the neighborhood school) might have benefitted from "the agitator's" involvement this past year, had all of his energy been set on making it a school he wanted to attend. |
Yes, I have noticed. And you already have the right to one IB school at every level -- just like everyone else in the city. Is that not sufficient? |
OMG, you are so full of sh-t. You probably have IB rights to Stuart Hobson, and definitely have feeder rights if you go to L-T. There may have been a few SWS parents who willingly gave up their feeder rights to Watkins and S-H when they stuck with SWS instead of going to Peabody. |
The neighbors care about proximity rights to SWS, since they currently have boundary rights to Stuart. The SWS parents care about middle school, since SWS has no feeder. There should be two separate meetings, since everyone is going to be holding their own grudge/pity party, unless they just make Stuart the middle school and shut everyone up. |
IB rights to Peabody weren't taken away, the neighborhood never lost the school. There were no IB rights to Prospect LC, which is SWS's new home. Nobody lost anything that they previously had. |
So much agita over a low-performing school which overwhelmingly serves low SES students anyway. |
|
|
|
|
I wish there were two meetings as well-a community meeting on preferences/boundary and a school specific meeting on feeders. |
|
If you are quoting another post, do not put your comment within the quote. This isn't difficult. You have to wonder whether the same person is posting all of these. |
Sorry, that was me. First response to this thread. |
|