Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It's fine if you want to live in the south. But outside of the south, it's not well-known.
So what? Most people don't know about small New England LACs outside of the Boston-DC corredor.
Not the PP, but the point is that Wake Forest might not be a good choice for students who don't want to stay in the south after graduation. So, a kid from this area who isn't familiar with the south, but who's thinking, "well, I'll try living in the south for college and if I don't like it, I'll move elsewhere after graduation" might find it tough going to look for a job in other parts of the country. A fair point, but maybe not determinative. Keep in mind, school reputations rise and fall. Not a lot of folks in this area had heard of Wash U 30 years ago, but it's a hot school now.
As far as your point about NE SLACs, I'd say it depends on the school -- Williams and Amherst definitely have national reputations; Middlebury, Bowdoin and Wesleyan somewhat less so, but they're certainly not unknown. I'm a native Californian who went to one of these schools, so I speak with some experience on this point.
In general, though, when you consider a school's reputation or prestige, you need to define your terms -- do you mean bumper sticker cred? recognition by grad school admissions committees (if so, in which field)? value in searching for a first job (again, if so, in which field)? alum network? For example: UMD computer science has a national reputation that far exceeds some other programs/departments. So, CS grads have plenty of job offers and an advantage in grad school applications. Additionally, they're building a strong alum network. But the bumper sticker might not mean a lot to most folks in Mountain View or Austin . . . yet. (For the record, I have no connection whatsoever to UMD, but my cousin recruits CS grads for Google.)