Why are all the SAHMs I know fat?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:At the risk of feeding the troll but with the honorable intention of ending all of this, let's just all agree on the facts: SAHMs are all fat, lazy, boring women and are really just prostitutes calling themselves wives. WOHMs are all snotty, super thin (but with really big buts) who farm out their kids to strangers in pursuit of the all mighty dollar while maintaining an annoying superior attitude towards SAHMs. BTW, everybody else sucks too. Now can we get back to the important threads about muggers beating up the elderly and the difficulties of scraping by on a 250k HHI?

YES!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If lower income people tend to be overweight more often, then wouldn't it make more sense that sahm are thinner, in general?

I pointed out before that this totally depends on what part of the country you're discussing. In Bethesda, the Upper East Side, Cleveland Park and Medina, WA outside of Seattle, the SAHMs are going to be the women in the -highest- income brackets. And surprise, these are not the fat chicks. In rural north Arkansas, the SAHMs are not in the highest brackets and are some of the poorest women in the US. They might be the same people you reference above.

New poster. Agree. The SAHMs in my neighborhood are bone thin and pretty fabulous looking - and they work hard at it. Lots of time spent at Sports Club LA and at the clubs playing tennis.

Really? There are women who actually do this? I thought this was a cliche. I'm in the wrong demographic I guess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If lower income people tend to be overweight more often, then wouldn't it make more sense that sahm are thinner, in general?

I pointed out before that this totally depends on what part of the country you're discussing. In Bethesda, the Upper East Side, Cleveland Park and Medina, WA outside of Seattle, the SAHMs are going to be the women in the -highest- income brackets. And surprise, these are not the fat chicks. In rural north Arkansas, the SAHMs are not in the highest brackets and are some of the poorest women in the US. They might be the same people you reference above.

New poster. Agree. The SAHMs in my neighborhood are bone thin and pretty fabulous looking - and they work hard at it. Lots of time spent at Sports Club LA and at the clubs playing tennis.

ewww, that sounds gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If lower income people tend to be overweight more often, then wouldn't it make more sense that sahm are thinner, in general?

I pointed out before that this totally depends on what part of the country you're discussing. In Bethesda, the Upper East Side, Cleveland Park and Medina, WA outside of Seattle, the SAHMs are going to be the women in the -highest- income brackets. And surprise, these are not the fat chicks. In rural north Arkansas, the SAHMs are not in the highest brackets and are some of the poorest women in the US. They might be the same people you reference above.

New poster. Agree. The SAHMs in my neighborhood are bone thin and pretty fabulous looking - and they work hard at it. Lots of time spent at Sports Club LA and at the clubs playing tennis.

Really? There are women who actually do this? I thought this was a cliche. I'm in the wrong demographic I guess.

They live in Kenwood.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am a fat SAHM. I was a fat workoholic without kids before becoming a SAHM. I like food and cocktails. I hate exercising. Not sure why care because I have a nice personality and would be pretty if I lost weight. It's true, my mom says so!

You sound 100% fabulous and like someone I would enjoy food and cocktails with. Stay cool and ignore the assholes, mom.

[Anonymous]

OP, where do you live? All of the SAHMs I know are skinny bitches! It's my fellow WOHMs that could afford to lose a few lbs...

[Anonymous]

This actually made me laugh. I'm a skinny SAHM here. I was much heavier when I worked because all I did was sit at the computer and had the freedom to go out to lunch and grab snacks from my desk any time I wanted to. I 100% support moms who work out the house as well has moms who stay home with their kids during the work hours. But seriously, I haven't been to the gym since my baby was born a year ago except for on weekends when my DH is around. I don't have the freedom to eat whenever I want or workout whenever I want because I'm playing and caring for my baby all day. Do your nannies sit around and eat and work out? NO! You are just bitter. Get a life and don't judge so much. It will rub off on your children then you will see a very ugly side of you in them.

[Anonymous]

" I don't have the freedom to eat whenever I want or workout whenever I want because I'm playing and caring for my baby all day."

Hard to believe, unless there is something wrong with your baby.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:" I don't have the freedom to eat whenever I want or workout whenever I want because I'm playing and caring for my baby all day."

Hard to believe, unless there is something wrong with your baby.

I am not the poster you quoted, however, how in the world is that hard to believe? Do the daycare workers or your nanny have time to eat all day and workout? Actually, your statment makes me think you never spend much time with your kids. Where are they on the weekend?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:" I don't have the freedom to eat whenever I want or workout whenever I want because I'm playing and caring for my baby all day."

Hard to believe, unless there is something wrong with your baby.

I'm pretty sure that the quoted PP manages meals, but means she is not sitting around grazing all day. But way to take the conversation to a new low and insult the baby! Biatch.

[Anonymous]

Wow - initial poster, I wonder if you would post this if you couldn't hide under the cloak of anonymity here. There are so many more things in the world to fill your mind with -- how about the disaster in Japan, for instance.

Why are you wasting thought time with such inane bitterness?

This forum can be a vehicle for imparting positivity and support to other parents. I am sad to see you posting such nonsense.

[Anonymous]

http://factoidz.com/why-lowincome-and-obesity-are-linked-together/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If lower income people tend to be overweight more often, then wouldn't it make more sense that sahm are thinner, in general?

I pointed out before that this totally depends on what part of the country you're discussing. In Bethesda, the Upper East Side, Cleveland Park and Medina, WA outside of Seattle, the SAHMs are going to be the women in the -highest- income brackets. And surprise, these are not the fat chicks. In rural north Arkansas, the SAHMs are not in the highest brackets and are some of the poorest women in the US. They might be the same people you reference above.

New poster. Agree. The SAHMs in my neighborhood are bone thin and pretty fabulous looking - and they work hard at it. Lots of time spent at Sports Club LA and at the clubs playing tennis.

ewww, that sounds gross.

At the risk of sounding like a fourteen year old, this entire thread is gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:At the risk of feeding the troll but with the honorable intention of ending all of this, let's just all agree on the facts: SAHMs are all fat, lazy, boring women and are really just prostitutes calling themselves wives. WOHMs are all snotty, super thin (but with really big buts) who farm out their kids to strangers in pursuit of the all mighty dollar while maintaining an annoying superior attitude towards SAHMs. BTW, everybody else sucks too. Now can we get back to the important threads about muggers beating up the elderly and the difficulties of scraping by on a 250k HHI?

Can I be your friend?

[Anonymous]

OMG. Why do people engage in this kind of drivel of a question??!

Exhausting. I wish people would not post these kind of questions. Just dumb.