MAGA what will make you happy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Voter ID, strong borders and deportation of border crashers. Immigration completely controlled by who will contribute and not drain resources.

I'm open to uncontrolled borders if all social spending is eliminated in the constitution. When the borders were open in the distant past people sank or swam with zero income redistribution, free hospital services or school. Charity was 100 percent private.

Your premise that immigrants, even illegal, are net takers is provable wrong. If anything, they're net contributors since they pay taxes but don't qualify for benefits. I don't know where you get this mistaken idea that they get "free hospital services" or "free schools." Your taxes aren't paying for hospital write-offs, and local property taxes pay for schools.

Voter ID is a weird one, too. It only serves to disenfranchise millions of eligible voters needlessly, many of them elderly or poor. It certainly has nothing to do will immigration. We should make voting easier, not harder.

[Anonymous]

What will make me happy as a MAGA is to spread Trumpism around the world.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Name something that doesn’t involve bringing others down. We know it makes you happy to “own the libs”, love Trump tearing down the east wing, and laugh at brown people being hunted in the street. I’m not asking about gloating. What is good in your personal life as a result of this regime? Has your grocery store lowered its prices? Did you finally get that promotion a DEI had stolen from you? Are you making so much money now that your wife can quit her job and stay home where she belongs pumping out babies? Is your child no longer gay? Are you paying less for health insurance? How has your life improved?

Immigration moratorium for 25 years. The foreign born population of the United States is already at record levels and we need decades to assimilate the tens of millions of newcomers into our nation. And we're all about to suffer a tidal wave of job losses due to AI and automation and the last thing we need is millions of foreigners coming here to compete for increasingly scarce jobs and resources.

But if MAGA women get to work producing the humongous families that the white nationalists want, there’s still going to be stiff competition for jobs, college admissions, resources, etc.

I’m with you on AI though. That’s the real threat to our well-being.

I don't know why you feel the need to drag race into it -- that's a tangent to my belief that we need decades to integrate the record-number of foreign-born citizens; maybe then everything can stop becoming a racial squabble.

But as to your substantive comment about "MAGA women" producing "humungous families" -- we are so far away from American citizens creating any kind of population boom, that this is not a serious argument. American citizens aren't even reproducing at population-stable rates (there are many reasons for this, but it's a separate conversation). And the Americans who want to have "humungous" families are going to do so anyway. Importing millions of foreigners just adds to that number.

Under an immigration moratorium, our population will likely stabilize or even shrink a little (which would not be a bad thing) before stabilizing. There is no threat of "humungous" American families creating a population book that will make it more difficult for our children to find jobs, houses, etc.

The threat is the 8 billion people on the planet who aren't Americans but want to come here, and will take jobs away from American kids when they do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voter ID, strong borders and deportation of border crashers. Immigration completely controlled by who will contribute and not drain resources.

I'm open to uncontrolled borders if all social spending is eliminated in the constitution. When the borders were open in the distant past people sank or swam with zero income redistribution, free hospital services or school. Charity was 100 percent private.

Your premise that immigrants, even illegal, are net takers is provable wrong. If anything, they're net contributors since they pay taxes but don't qualify for benefits. I don't know where you get this mistaken idea that they get "free hospital services" or "free schools." Your taxes aren't paying for hospital write-offs, and local property taxes pay for schools.

Voter ID is a weird one, too. It only serves to disenfranchise millions of eligible voters needlessly, many of them elderly or poor. It certainly has nothing to do will immigration. We should make voting easier, not harder.

Yes, the Lib agenda in a nutshell, “the more the merrier.” Why make the illegals trek thousands of miles through Mexico to break-in, it’s too dangerous. The US government should just have daily flights from all these disaffected countries in central/south America and bring them directly to the US, since they are such a positive influence on everything. Of course, housing and all the other benefits will be set-up in advance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voter ID, strong borders and deportation of border crashers. Immigration completely controlled by who will contribute and not drain resources.

I'm open to uncontrolled borders if all social spending is eliminated in the constitution. When the borders were open in the distant past people sank or swam with zero income redistribution, free hospital services or school. Charity was 100 percent private.

Dear MAGA dumb-f**k, here's a pro-tip: a rising tide lifts all boats.

No, it's a zero-sum system. Ds take from those who have, to give to those who don't have, often without rhyme or reason apart from a fundamentally Communist notion that nobody should have any more than anyone else, without regard to merit, effort, or initiative.

Money taken from those who have it sinks them; it doesn't cause them to rise along with those standing there with their hands out.

No.

If billionaires paid their fair share of taxes, they wouldn’t miss that money in the slightest. It’s not like they’re using it for anything worthwhile. Another Monet for their seventeenth villa in Italy? A yacht for their yacht? Quack immortality treatments? A few Congresspeople here and there? After a certain point, it’s pure excess. And as we’re all seeing with the release of the Epstein files, there is a level of wealth at which there is no accountability. It’s looking more and more like extreme wealth creates monsters. That alone should be enough to tax centibillionaires out of existence.

And if you don’t think billionaires owe anything to anyone, there is the fact that they made their billions in the first place by leveraging public infrastructure paid for by we the people.

"Fair share" meaning give some to you, even though you did nothing to earn it? Ok, then.

Many consider that "fair" is reaping the rewards of your own labor and efforts, not standing there with your hand out to sponge off the success of other people. You want more money? Go earn it for yourself.

Lmao…pathetic.

Suck harder, boy, I’m sure that the billionaire leeches will give you a nice pat on the head while they laugh at you.

Why are you so jealous of others? You want more money? Go earn it, like others have done. If you're incapable of earning as much money as you'd like, that sounds like a "you" problem, not like a situation requiring the government to redistribute money to you from those who have experienced more success in life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voter ID, strong borders and deportation of border crashers. Immigration completely controlled by who will contribute and not drain resources.

I'm open to uncontrolled borders if all social spending is eliminated in the constitution. When the borders were open in the distant past people sank or swam with zero income redistribution, free hospital services or school. Charity was 100 percent private.

Dear MAGA dumb-f**k, here's a pro-tip: a rising tide lifts all boats.

No, it's a zero-sum system. Ds take from those who have, to give to those who don't have, often without rhyme or reason apart from a fundamentally Communist notion that nobody should have any more than anyone else, without regard to merit, effort, or initiative.

Money taken from those who have it sinks them; it doesn't cause them to rise along with those standing there with their hands out.

No.

If billionaires paid their fair share of taxes, they wouldn’t miss that money in the slightest. It’s not like they’re using it for anything worthwhile. Another Monet for their seventeenth villa in Italy? A yacht for their yacht? Quack immortality treatments? A few Congresspeople here and there? After a certain point, it’s pure excess. And as we’re all seeing with the release of the Epstein files, there is a level of wealth at which there is no accountability. It’s looking more and more like extreme wealth creates monsters. That alone should be enough to tax centibillionaires out of existence.

And if you don’t think billionaires owe anything to anyone, there is the fact that they made their billions in the first place by leveraging public infrastructure paid for by we the people.

"Fair share" meaning give some to you, even though you did nothing to earn it? Ok, then.

Many consider that "fair" is reaping the rewards of your own labor and efforts, not standing there with your hand out to sponge off the success of other people. You want more money? Go earn it for yourself.

All billionaire wealth is siphoned off the labor of others. Lick those boots harder.

[Anonymous]

There's a woman on twitch and tiktok who interviews MAGA people and when she asks for them to envision life after 15 years of GOP rule, they can't come up with any new, positive policy. It's just the same talking points.

They have no ideas for anything new. They don't envision their day-to-day lives any better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voter ID, strong borders and deportation of border crashers. Immigration completely controlled by who will contribute and not drain resources.

I'm open to uncontrolled borders if all social spending is eliminated in the constitution. When the borders were open in the distant past people sank or swam with zero income redistribution, free hospital services or school. Charity was 100 percent private.

Dear MAGA dumb-f**k, here's a pro-tip: a rising tide lifts all boats.

No, it's a zero-sum system. Ds take from those who have, to give to those who don't have, often without rhyme or reason apart from a fundamentally Communist notion that nobody should have any more than anyone else, without regard to merit, effort, or initiative.

Money taken from those who have it sinks them; it doesn't cause them to rise along with those standing there with their hands out.

No.

If billionaires paid their fair share of taxes, they wouldn’t miss that money in the slightest. It’s not like they’re using it for anything worthwhile. Another Monet for their seventeenth villa in Italy? A yacht for their yacht? Quack immortality treatments? A few Congresspeople here and there? After a certain point, it’s pure excess. And as we’re all seeing with the release of the Epstein files, there is a level of wealth at which there is no accountability. It’s looking more and more like extreme wealth creates monsters. That alone should be enough to tax centibillionaires out of existence.

And if you don’t think billionaires owe anything to anyone, there is the fact that they made their billions in the first place by leveraging public infrastructure paid for by we the people.

"Fair share" meaning give some to you, even though you did nothing to earn it? Ok, then.

Many consider that "fair" is reaping the rewards of your own labor and efforts, not standing there with your hand out to sponge off the success of other people. You want more money? Go earn it for yourself.

Lmao…pathetic.

Suck harder, boy, I’m sure that the billionaire leeches will give you a nice pat on the head while they laugh at you.

Why are you so jealous of others? You want more money? Go earn it, like others have done. If you're incapable of earning as much money as you'd like, that sounds like a "you" problem, not like a situation requiring the government to redistribute money to you from those who have experienced more success in life.

You’re thinking too much like a capitalist, Libs don’t believe in that. Remember Obama, “you didn’t build that.” Today’s modern Lib thinks you owe the illegals, but the redistribution must occur under their direction, so they can buy their future votes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Name something that doesn’t involve bringing others down. We know it makes you happy to “own the libs”, love Trump tearing down the east wing, and laugh at brown people being hunted in the street. I’m not asking about gloating. What is good in your personal life as a result of this regime? Has your grocery store lowered its prices? Did you finally get that promotion a DEI had stolen from you? Are you making so much money now that your wife can quit her job and stay home where she belongs pumping out babies? Is your child no longer gay? Are you paying less for health insurance? How has your life improved?

Immigration moratorium for 25 years. The foreign born population of the United States is already at record levels and we need decades to assimilate the tens of millions of newcomers into our nation. And we're all about to suffer a tidal wave of job losses due to AI and automation and the last thing we need is millions of foreigners coming here to compete for increasingly scarce jobs and resources.

But if MAGA women get to work producing the humongous families that the white nationalists want, there’s still going to be stiff competition for jobs, college admissions, resources, etc.

I’m with you on AI though. That’s the real threat to our well-being.

I don't know why you feel the need to drag race into it -- that's a tangent to my belief that we need decades to integrate the record-number of foreign-born citizens; maybe then everything can stop becoming a racial squabble.

But as to your substantive comment about "MAGA women" producing "humungous families" -- we are so far away from American citizens creating any kind of population boom, that this is not a serious argument. American citizens aren't even reproducing at population-stable rates (there are many reasons for this, but it's a separate conversation). And the Americans who want to have "humungous" families are going to do so anyway. Importing millions of foreigners just adds to that number.

Under an immigration moratorium, our population will likely stabilize or even shrink a little (which would not be a bad thing) before stabilizing. There is no threat of "humungous" American families creating a population book that will make it more difficult for our children to find jobs, houses, etc.

The threat is the 8 billion people on the planet who aren't Americans but want to come here, and will take jobs away from American kids when they do.

I guess you haven’t been paying attention to Project 2025, or the concerted effort on the right to push women out of college and careers and into babymaking, or any of the innumerable racial dogwhistles coming from alt-right influencers and official government social media accounts who don’t like the direction the demographics are headed. But thank you for agreeing that natalism is a ridiculous and unrealistic policy for MAGA to be pushing, and directly at odds with the scarcity mindset that’s driving the xenophobia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What will make me happy as a MAGA is to spread Trumpism around the world.

Like you did with measles?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What will make me happy as a MAGA is to spread Trumpism around the world.

But why — that’s the question. What specifically is it that makes you happy, and how does this get you that joy?

[Anonymous]

Who cares what will make MAGA happy? Enough pandering to a bunch of people who whine all the time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voter ID, strong borders and deportation of border crashers. Immigration completely controlled by who will contribute and not drain resources.

I'm open to uncontrolled borders if all social spending is eliminated in the constitution. When the borders were open in the distant past people sank or swam with zero income redistribution, free hospital services or school. Charity was 100 percent private.

What are your feelings on racism and pedophilia.....just curious.

PP has a serious point, but you can’t answer it with any substance so you come back with the irrelevant name calling, pathetic as usual.

BTW, why don’t you ask Bill Clinton, what was it 17 White House Epstein visits ? What was going on there.

DP and it is a serious question. There was no "irrelevant name calling" whatsoever.

Just admit it. You have bought the false scapegoating of illegal immigrants hook, line, and sinker; because you are at your heart, a racist, who would rather blame immigrants than admit the reality that the very rich have completely snowed you. And you would rather defend those rich, racist, child-raping scumbags than admit you are wrong.

And BTW, Bill Clinton has never been a gotcha for you guys. No one on the Dem side is saying to spare him scrutiny. So you failed on every level with your ridiculous, evasive post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who cares what will make MAGA happy? Enough pandering to a bunch of people who whine all the time.

And believe outright lies. Constantly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voter ID, strong borders and deportation of border crashers. Immigration completely controlled by who will contribute and not drain resources.

I'm open to uncontrolled borders if all social spending is eliminated in the constitution. When the borders were open in the distant past people sank or swam with zero income redistribution, free hospital services or school. Charity was 100 percent private.

What are your feelings on racism and pedophilia.....just curious.

PP has a serious point, but you can’t answer it with any substance so you come back with the irrelevant name calling, pathetic as usual.

BTW, why don’t you ask Bill Clinton, what was it 17 White House Epstein visits ? What was going on there.

DP and it is a serious question. There was no "irrelevant name calling" whatsoever.

Just admit it. You have bought the false scapegoating of illegal immigrants hook, line, and sinker; because you are at your heart, a racist, who would rather blame immigrants than admit the reality that the very rich have completely snowed you. And you would rather defend those rich, racist, child-raping scumbags than admit you are wrong.

And BTW, Bill Clinton has never been a gotcha for you guys. No one on the Dem side is saying to spare him scrutiny. So you failed on every level with your ridiculous, evasive post.

You never addressed the point of PP’s post, and just doubled down on name calling. I get it, you’re just incapable, that’s fine.