Perfect on paper guy but he’s…5’4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why is height always so important for women?
Even short women reject men because of their height. It doesn’t matter that they are taller than them.

Why is a pretty face and slim waist always so important for men?

Even ugly men reject ugly women. It doesn’t matter that they are unattractive as well.

[Anonymous]

I’m petite too, married a 6’ 20” m who became increasingly narcissistic. I had to become and stand tall for my sanity.

[Anonymous]

Leave because you are shallow. Let someone else get this guy.

Meanwhile- you are also short.

[Anonymous]

https://x.com/i/status/1904466041943560554

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is height always so important for women?
Even short women reject men because of their height. It doesn’t matter that they are taller than them.

Why is a pretty face and slim waist always so important for losers?

Even ugly losers reject ugly women. It doesn’t matter that they are unattractive as well.

FIFY.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Leave because you are shallow. Let someone else get this guy.

Meanwhile- you are also short.

Short and old.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Don't do affirmative action for men. He's not the perfect man. He's missing a key element important to you: height. Imagine if you were 250lbs, but everything else about you was unchanged. He wouldn't give you the time of day long enough to make out your hair color, much less actually date you long enough to think of you as the perfect woman who just happens to be fat. You'd just be another fat chick he passed on. He wouldn't feel a bit of guilt about it either because no one expects men to downgrade their standards.

Think of it this way: How mad would you be if this midget cheated on you? It would sting that much more because you lowered your standards for him. Yet, this guy is every bit as likely to cheat as his 6'4 counterpart because men don't do gratitude. Move on.

The problem is that OP is broke loser who making herself alone due to her arbitrary standards. She's not saying she's ditching the guy and getting someone better. She's saying she's not taking a chance on this great guy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is height always so important for women?
Even short women reject men because of their height. It doesn’t matter that they are taller than them.

Why is weight important to men? Why are breasts and butts important to men?

Weight is at least somewhat changeable, especially today with GLP1s.

Men are nowhere near as picky about “breasts and butts” as women are about height.

Says who? Have you been fat before?

Yes.

Losing weight is not easy, but it is easier than getting taller.

Other than having one of those medieval operations where he is bedridden while his legs are broken in multiple places and then stretched out for several months, just to add an inch or two, there is nothing men can do to get taller.

So what if men can't control it? Why should that change what women are attracted to? Men judge women for all sorts of things we can't control or can change only through similarly medieval means.

You may be confusing me with someone else. I am Team “women shouldn’t settle—for the man’s sake.”

Then why are you wasting time pointing out that men's height can't be changed? Who cares?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you had a short son who got rejected for his height, what would you think of that girl who rejected him? Nothing good, I’m sure.

Please do share what would you think about the boy who rejected your ugly daughter for being ugly?

My son is short and I don't think any girl who wants taller needs to date him. What the hell is wrong with you guys. No man is entitled to a woman.

[Anonymous]

If you're not physically attracted to him, it's not going to work, no matter what choices you may or may not have for other mates or how good he is in theory. It doesn't matter if it's due to height or something else; you don't like him physically. Your attraction will not grow. Let him find someone who really does like him and you go find someone else too. Or be alone, but don't lie to yourself or him and stay because you're desperate or getting there. It won't work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If you're not attracted to him, then you're not attracted to him.

That's sad, I find your quote, that he must be at at least 5'8 a little odd considering at the age of 39 and this would be a first date. Are you still planning to have children? At this age I would think you're looking for a lifetime companion. But of course it's important to be attracted to your lifetime companion height equals attractiveness to you then you have your answer.

[b]I ended up marrying a tall man, but that was never my criteria. I dated short and tall men. The man I ended up marrying was smart and funny and made me laugh. That was my criteria. He had to be as smart or smarter than me and funny. It didn't matter what package it came in because if he met that criteria, I found him attractive.[/b/]

Why are you offering up your criteria as if you think you should be OP's role model? One could call you unfair for discriminating against men who aren't funny when there are more important things in life.

Others are allowed to have their preferences just as you're allowed to have yours. You're not better because your preferences are different from OP's.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't do affirmative action for men. He's not the perfect man. He's missing a key element important to you: height. Imagine if you were 250lbs, but everything else about you was unchanged. He wouldn't give you the time of day long enough to make out your hair color, much less actually date you long enough to think of you as the perfect woman who just happens to be fat. You'd just be another fat chick he passed on. He wouldn't feel a bit of guilt about it either because no one expects men to downgrade their standards.

Think of it this way: How mad would you be if this midget cheated on you? It would sting that much more because you lowered your standards for him. Yet, this guy is every bit as likely to cheat as his 6'4 counterpart because men don't do gratitude. Move on.

The problem is that OP is broke loser who making herself alone due to her arbitrary standards. She's not saying she's ditching the guy and getting someone better. She's saying she's not taking a chance on this great guy.

PP here. I see no evidence OP is a loser, but calling strangers names online does make you a massive loser.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't do affirmative action for men. He's not the perfect man. He's missing a key element important to you: height. Imagine if you were 250lbs, but everything else about you was unchanged. He wouldn't give you the time of day long enough to make out your hair color, much less actually date you long enough to think of you as the perfect woman who just happens to be fat. You'd just be another fat chick he passed on. He wouldn't feel a bit of guilt about it either because no one expects men to downgrade their standards.

Think of it this way: How mad would you be if this midget cheated on you? It would sting that much more because you lowered your standards for him. Yet, this guy is every bit as likely to cheat as his 6'4 counterpart because men don't do gratitude. Move on.

The problem is that OP is broke loser who making herself alone due to her arbitrary standards. She's not saying she's ditching the guy and getting someone better. She's saying she's not taking a chance on this great guy.

PP here. I see no evidence OP is a loser, but calling strangers names online does make you a massive loser.

Irony is dead.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don't do affirmative action for men. He's not the perfect man. He's missing a key element important to you: height. Imagine if you were 250lbs, but everything else about you was unchanged. He wouldn't give you the time of day long enough to make out your hair color, much less actually date you long enough to think of you as the perfect woman who just happens to be fat. You'd just be another fat chick he passed on. He wouldn't feel a bit of guilt about it either because no one expects men to downgrade their standards.

Think of it this way: How mad would you be if this midget cheated on you? It would sting that much more because you lowered your standards for him. Yet, this guy is every bit as likely to cheat as his 6'4 counterpart because men don't do gratitude. Move on.

The problem is that OP is broke loser who making herself alone due to her arbitrary standards. She's not saying she's ditching the guy and getting someone better. She's saying she's not taking a chance on this great guy.

PP here. I see no evidence OP is a loser, but calling strangers names online does make you a massive loser.

39 and posting this crap = loser

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you had a short son who got rejected for his height, what would you think of that girl who rejected him? Nothing good, I’m sure.

Please do share what would you think about the boy who rejected your ugly daughter for being ugly?

My son is short and I don't think any girl who wants taller needs to date him. What the hell is wrong with you guys. No man is entitled to a woman.

Agreed. Why should OP be shamed into dating someone she’s not attracted to and why should a guy be stuck with someone who isn’t attracted to him?

And come ON. I can’t be the only person who started dating my husband in part because he was hot to me