Erika Kirk attacks Candace Owens for her theories

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She's so disgusting. They all are.

Tim Walz was right when he called them all weird.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good God.

Just reading the comments here makes me nauseous.
The reality is that Erika Kirk would give you idiots more grace than you even consider giving to her.
She did not ask for this role. She did not wish her husband would be murdered in front of millions so she could assume the role he once held.

How bold of you to know exactly how a widow with two young children should grieve.
I think the majority of you are just plain jealous women who have never known true love.

Although she did not ask for this role, she's not exactly running away from it either.

She stepped into the role because this is what Charlie would have wanted. She has made that very clear.
And, her appearances are to promote the book that Charlie finished just before he was murdered.
It amazes me that the people here, who have likely never suffered a loss so significant as Erika has suffered, seem to know what she should say, how she should act, and how she should grieve. You people just have no idea.

Not true. CK believed women should not work and stay in the background. I doubt his succession plan included a woman.

That's a distortion of his beliefs. Ideally, kids benefit from one parent being at home to nurture kids. Of course, many families can't afford to do that, mine included.

What is distorted about this:

"Submit to your husband, Taylor. You’re not in charge"

I would not want my daughter to marry any man who spoke this way.

[Anonymous]

Erika doesn't seem like a widow that particularly cared about her husband much.

If she actually cared, she would be more interested in finding how and why Charlie died rather than accepting the BS explanation of the government.

It's also known that they were getting close to finalizing their divorce.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's so disgusting. They all are.

Tim Walz was right when he called them all weird.

He's one to talk!

[Anonymous]

Kirk looks like she is pissed by the devil. Did you see her eyes? Thought her head might spin around at any moment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To me, Erika Kirk comes off as a woman whose husband was a real a.s.shole. She's struggling in the role of grieving widow because she doesn't miss him. I know that if my husband ever dies, I'll be in for the struggle of my life to pretend I care. It's pretty stupid how spouses, especially women, are expected to be almost suicidal with grief and no one asks what the marriage was like.

Why do you stay married?

Not the PP but my close friend would have said the same thing about not mourning a death, and she couldn’t leave because the courts would have given 50/50 custody to a violently abusive man. She was scared for the lives of her children. At least when she was there, he hit her and not her daughters.

I think it is possible the same thing is true of Erika Kirk but we can’t know. She and her dead husband were against everything I stand for, but I hate the attacks on her. It’s cruel, and when I see Democrats doing it, they seem no better than Candace Owens.

Yeah that’s just bad decision making on her part. My mother was brutally abused and you know what she did? Took me and left him. No money, no future security, nothing at all. She went to another state and protected me. That’s what you do when you are facing true life/death situations. Your friend either wants attention, is overly dramatic or is incredibly stupid. If you fear that someone will kill your kids you flee for your life. You live in a remote jungle if you have to. You don’t stick around.

DP. Are you suggesting women turn fugitive and kidnap their kids? That's what taking a child out of state with no intention of returning and without the other parent's consent is. Over here in reality, most fugitives are caught. How are the children better off when Mom is in prison and sociopath Dad has sole custody?

Your Mom might have tried her best, but this vicious post you wrote to hurt a complete stranger shows you turned out as horrible as your Dad.

+1 That was shockingly nasty.

The Erika Kirk attackers like that PP are making Democrats look awful, maybe because they are as nasty as that PP. I wish they would stop.

The “Erika Kirk attacker” being discussed here is Candace Owens, who is very much not a Democrat.

The people in this thread who are gleefully joining Candace Owens in her attacks are Democrats.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's so disgusting. They all are.

Tim Walz was right when he called them all weird.

He's one to talk!

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To me, Erika Kirk comes off as a woman whose husband was a real a.s.shole. She's struggling in the role of grieving widow because she doesn't miss him. I know that if my husband ever dies, I'll be in for the struggle of my life to pretend I care. It's pretty stupid how spouses, especially women, are expected to be almost suicidal with grief and no one asks what the marriage was like.

Why do you stay married?

Not the PP but my close friend would have said the same thing about not mourning a death, and she couldn’t leave because the courts would have given 50/50 custody to a violently abusive man. She was scared for the lives of her children. At least when she was there, he hit her and not her daughters.

I think it is possible the same thing is true of Erika Kirk but we can’t know. She and her dead husband were against everything I stand for, but I hate the attacks on her. It’s cruel, and when I see Democrats doing it, they seem no better than Candace Owens.

Yeah that’s just bad decision making on her part. My mother was brutally abused and you know what she did? Took me and left him. No money, no future security, nothing at all. She went to another state and protected me. That’s what you do when you are facing true life/death situations. Your friend either wants attention, is overly dramatic or is incredibly stupid. If you fear that someone will kill your kids you flee for your life. You live in a remote jungle if you have to. You don’t stick around.

DP. Are you suggesting women turn fugitive and kidnap their kids? That's what taking a child out of state with no intention of returning and without the other parent's consent is. Over here in reality, most fugitives are caught. How are the children better off when Mom is in prison and sociopath Dad has sole custody?

Your Mom might have tried her best, but this vicious post you wrote to hurt a complete stranger shows you turned out as horrible as your Dad.

+1 That was shockingly nasty.

The Erika Kirk attackers like that PP are making Democrats look awful, maybe because they are as nasty as that PP. I wish they would stop.

The “Erika Kirk attacker” being discussed here is Candace Owens, who is very much not a Democrat.

The people in this thread who are gleefully joining Candace Owens in her attacks are Democrats.

If you think Democrats are the only political party to disparage someone, I have a bridge to sell you. Republicans can be definitively heartless towards various people themselves.

[Anonymous]

It’s all so ridiculously fake, the recent Erika Kirk interviews are AI. We’re being exploited and taken for fools. See Erika Mattfeld Kirk. Wake up people. This is AI.

[Anonymous]

The town hall is a joke. Bari Weiss. hahaha So pathetic.

Charlie Kirk was a closet Jew. Got it.

Questions are obviously contrived and the answers are memorized. Erika Kirk's cadence when answering shows she's remembering her lines. And the emotions happening on a delay. She's an absolute moron.

Even some of the the commercials are propaganda.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To me, Erika Kirk comes off as a woman whose husband was a real a.s.shole. She's struggling in the role of grieving widow because she doesn't miss him. I know that if my husband ever dies, I'll be in for the struggle of my life to pretend I care. It's pretty stupid how spouses, especially women, are expected to be almost suicidal with grief and no one asks what the marriage was like.

Why do you stay married?

Not the PP but my close friend would have said the same thing about not mourning a death, and she couldn’t leave because the courts would have given 50/50 custody to a violently abusive man. She was scared for the lives of her children. At least when she was there, he hit her and not her daughters.

I think it is possible the same thing is true of Erika Kirk but we can’t know. She and her dead husband were against everything I stand for, but I hate the attacks on her. It’s cruel, and when I see Democrats doing it, they seem no better than Candace Owens.

Yeah that’s just bad decision making on her part. My mother was brutally abused and you know what she did? Took me and left him. No money, no future security, nothing at all. She went to another state and protected me. That’s what you do when you are facing true life/death situations. Your friend either wants attention, is overly dramatic or is incredibly stupid. If you fear that someone will kill your kids you flee for your life. You live in a remote jungle if you have to. You don’t stick around.

DP. Are you suggesting women turn fugitive and kidnap their kids? That's what taking a child out of state with no intention of returning and without the other parent's consent is. Over here in reality, most fugitives are caught. How are the children better off when Mom is in prison and sociopath Dad has sole custody?

Your Mom might have tried her best, but this vicious post you wrote to hurt a complete stranger shows you turned out as horrible as your Dad.

+1 That was shockingly nasty.

The Erika Kirk attackers like that PP are making Democrats look awful, maybe because they are as nasty as that PP. I wish they would stop.

The “Erika Kirk attacker” being discussed here is Candace Owens, who is very much not a Democrat.

The people in this thread who are gleefully joining Candace Owens in her attacks are Democrats.

If you think Democrats are the only political party to disparage someone, I have a bridge to sell you. Republicans can be definitively heartless towards various people themselves.

Both parties are filled with heartless, selfish folks who happily spend other people's money. .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The town hall is a joke. Bari Weiss. hahaha So pathetic.

Charlie Kirk was a closet Jew. Got it.

Questions are obviously contrived and the answers are memorized. Erika Kirk's cadence when answering shows she's remembering her lines. And the emotions happening on a delay. She's an absolute moron.

Even some of the the commercials are propaganda.

Shabbat Shalom Baby

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The town hall is a joke. Bari Weiss. hahaha So pathetic.

Charlie Kirk was a closet Jew. Got it.

Questions are obviously contrived and the answers are memorized. Erika Kirk's cadence when answering shows she's remembering her lines. And the emotions happening on a delay. She's an absolute moron.

Even some of the the commercials are propaganda.

The cadence is what is giving AI, along with the flickering nystagmus, robotic vocal tones, perfect makeup that never runs…”quite frankly” “Daddy’s home, Shabbat Shalom” haha. Wowzers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To me, Erika Kirk comes off as a woman whose husband was a real a.s.shole. She's struggling in the role of grieving widow because she doesn't miss him. I know that if my husband ever dies, I'll be in for the struggle of my life to pretend I care. It's pretty stupid how spouses, especially women, are expected to be almost suicidal with grief and no one asks what the marriage was like.

Why do you stay married?

Not the PP but my close friend would have said the same thing about not mourning a death, and she couldn’t leave because the courts would have given 50/50 custody to a violently abusive man. She was scared for the lives of her children. At least when she was there, he hit her and not her daughters.

I think it is possible the same thing is true of Erika Kirk but we can’t know. She and her dead husband were against everything I stand for, but I hate the attacks on her. It’s cruel, and when I see Democrats doing it, they seem no better than Candace Owens.

Yeah that’s just bad decision making on her part. My mother was brutally abused and you know what she did? Took me and left him. No money, no future security, nothing at all. She went to another state and protected me. That’s what you do when you are facing true life/death situations. Your friend either wants attention, is overly dramatic or is incredibly stupid. If you fear that someone will kill your kids you flee for your life. You live in a remote jungle if you have to. You don’t stick around.

DP. Are you suggesting women turn fugitive and kidnap their kids? That's what taking a child out of state with no intention of returning and without the other parent's consent is. Over here in reality, most fugitives are caught. How are the children better off when Mom is in prison and sociopath Dad has sole custody?

Your Mom might have tried her best, but this vicious post you wrote to hurt a complete stranger shows you turned out as horrible as your Dad.

+1 That was shockingly nasty.

The Erika Kirk attackers like that PP are making Democrats look awful, maybe because they are as nasty as that PP. I wish they would stop.

The “Erika Kirk attacker” being discussed here is Candace Owens, who is very much not a Democrat.

The people in this thread who are gleefully joining Candace Owens in her attacks are Democrats.

If you think Democrats are the only political party to disparage someone, I have a bridge to sell you. Republicans can be definitively heartless towards various people themselves.

It is impossible to have a discussion with someone so dense. Nothing in what was written approached anything like the bolded. Of course the Republicans wildly disparage people. That doesn’t take away from the fact that the disgusting posts in this thread are from Democrats.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Are people really stupid enough to believe the narrative that the government is presenting about this case? That might have worked 24 years ago but people are a little bit more wise now.

Seems to me like people are more gullible now and making up their own conspiracy theories right and left. Which is the opposite of wise.