Erika Kirk attacks Candace Owens for her theories

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good God.

Just reading the comments here makes me nauseous.
The reality is that Erika Kirk would give you idiots more grace than you even consider giving to her.
She did not ask for this role. She did not wish her husband would be murdered in front of millions so she could assume the role he once held.

How bold of you to know exactly how a widow with two young children should grieve.
I think the majority of you are just plain jealous women who have never known true love.

You really think she’d give any of us grace?

I think you are a delusional fool who doesn’t realize they are getting played.

I think you're a cynic who's projecting the way you would behave onto Ms. Kirk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To me, Erika Kirk comes off as a woman whose husband was a real a.s.shole. She's struggling in the role of grieving widow because she doesn't miss him. I know that if my husband ever dies, I'll be in for the struggle of my life to pretend I care. It's pretty stupid how spouses, especially women, are expected to be almost suicidal with grief and no one asks what the marriage was like.

Why do you stay married?

My husband is a violent nutjob who hurts the kids and I, and has promised in all seriousness to exploit the shared custody that is now the default nationwide to punish the kids if I leave.

Hey, you asked.

I asked, and I am sorry for both you and your children. I understand and thank you for your response. I reread my initial response and I realize it came across as snarky, not my intent, but I was honestly curious. Peace and I hope you find a way out safely.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good God.

Just reading the comments here makes me nauseous.
The reality is that Erika Kirk would give you idiots more grace than you even consider giving to her.
She did not ask for this role. She did not wish her husband would be murdered in front of millions so she could assume the role he once held.

How bold of you to know exactly how a widow with two young children should grieve.
I think the majority of you are just plain jealous women who have never known true love.

Although she did not ask for this role, she's not exactly running away from it either.

She stepped into the role because this is what Charlie would have wanted. She has made that very clear.
And, her appearances are to promote the book that Charlie finished just before he was murdered.
It amazes me that the people here, who have likely never suffered a loss so significant as Erika has suffered, seem to know what she should say, how she should act, and how she should grieve. You people just have no idea.

Not true. CK believed women should not work and stay in the background. I doubt his succession plan included a woman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To me, Erika Kirk comes off as a woman whose husband was a real a.s.shole. She's struggling in the role of grieving widow because she doesn't miss him. I know that if my husband ever dies, I'll be in for the struggle of my life to pretend I care. It's pretty stupid how spouses, especially women, are expected to be almost suicidal with grief and no one asks what the marriage was like.

Why do you stay married?

My husband is a violent nutjob who hurts the kids and I, and has promised in all seriousness to exploit the shared custody that is now the default nationwide to punish the kids if I leave.

Hey, you asked.

I asked, and I am sorry for both you and your children. I understand and thank you for your response. I reread my initial response and I realize it came across as snarky, not my intent, but I was honestly curious. Peace and I hope you find a way out safely.

Thank you. I mean that. I'm working on it.

No one ever talks about the women trapped by the equivalent of a 200lb wild animal when they lament the decline of marriage or bash women who aren't adequately doting. Many husbands are just horrible people, and that's leave aside how they sabotage women in nonviolent ways.

I say leave Erika Kirk alone. There's a reason she's not broken up about his death. It's not just that their marriage was a business deal (if it was). She's behaving like someone who has been held back and was just champing at the bit to be her dynamic, executive self finally. That marriage trapped her in some way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good God.

Just reading the comments here makes me nauseous.
The reality is that Erika Kirk would give you idiots more grace than you even consider giving to her.
She did not ask for this role. She did not wish her husband would be murdered in front of millions so she could assume the role he once held.

How bold of you to know exactly how a widow with two young children should grieve.
I think the majority of you are just plain jealous women who have never known true love.

Although she did not ask for this role, she's not exactly running away from it either.

She stepped into the role because this is what Charlie would have wanted. She has made that very clear.
And, her appearances are to promote the book that Charlie finished just before he was murdered.
It amazes me that the people here, who have likely never suffered a loss so significant as Erika has suffered, seem to know what she should say, how she should act, and how she should grieve. You people just have no idea.

Not true. CK believed women should not work and stay in the background. I doubt his succession plan included a woman.

That's a distortion of his beliefs. Ideally, kids benefit from one parent being at home to nurture kids. Of course, many families can't afford to do that, mine included.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To me, Erika Kirk comes off as a woman whose husband was a real a.s.shole. She's struggling in the role of grieving widow because she doesn't miss him. I know that if my husband ever dies, I'll be in for the struggle of my life to pretend I care. It's pretty stupid how spouses, especially women, are expected to be almost suicidal with grief and no one asks what the marriage was like.

You are an idiot.

She’s a con just like him

Not a Christian fueling hate to make money

Why the hell are you ok with her getting taxpayer monies??

Why are you ok with her saying women should not work? Why are you ok with her hateful shit??

She’s not grieving she’s a criminal con!!

Oof, Erika Kirk really upsets you. I can't match your energy, sorry. Do you know her? I have too much going on in my life to be this incensed over a stranger.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I might be a conspiracy theorist about that whole thing.

Her being so put together with hair and makeup … it was only 12 weeks ago.

Who knows how who mourns and how, but … in my lifetime experience, I’ve never seen whatever is happening now with her

Bs she’s not grieving she’s grifting!!!! All day every day she’s a gid damned con artist spewing hate

It's true that everyone grieves in their own way but when my BIL was murdered just getting back into the groove of living took three months

She's grifting and doing her best to steal Usha Vance's husband. Such a sterling character!

[Anonymous]

I'm the PP who thinks Erika Kirk hated being married to Charlie Kirk. Does anyone think Candace Owens was in love with Charlie Kirk? I took a look at a couple of clips from the segments they did together while he was alive. The adoration in her eyes is really obvious to me. Her behavior since his death also feels a lot like that of a grieving wife.

I think what's really going on in this clash is that the woman who loved him (Candace) is offended that the woman he chose didn't really care for him. Likewise, the woman who didn't care for him (Erika) can't relate to how broken up another woman is over him and finds it repellent. If Erika had loved him, she could bond with Candace over shared grief and a burning need to avenge him. They'd probably be doing "Who Killed Charlie?" segments together. Because she didn't love him, however, Candace's grief is repelling her and I think that's what's really behind Erika publicly demanding Candace give it a rest. She can't say that openly though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Good God.

Just reading the comments here makes me nauseous.
The reality is that Erika Kirk would give you idiots more grace than you even consider giving to her.
She did not ask for this role. She did not wish her husband would be murdered in front of millions so she could assume the role he once held.

How bold of you to know exactly how a widow with two young children should grieve.
I think the majority of you are just plain jealous women who have never known true love.

No one is jealous of her. I would never want to see anyone get their neck blown out in front of me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To me, Erika Kirk comes off as a woman whose husband was a real a.s.shole. She's struggling in the role of grieving widow because she doesn't miss him. I know that if my husband ever dies, I'll be in for the struggle of my life to pretend I care. It's pretty stupid how spouses, especially women, are expected to be almost suicidal with grief and no one asks what the marriage was like.

Why do you stay married?

My husband is a violent nutjob who hurts the kids and I, and has promised in all seriousness to exploit the shared custody that is now the default nationwide to punish the kids if I leave.

Hey, you asked.

I asked, and I am sorry for both you and your children. I understand and thank you for your response. I reread my initial response and I realize it came across as snarky, not my intent, but I was honestly curious. Peace and I hope you find a way out safely.

Thank you. I mean that. I'm working on it.

No one ever talks about the women trapped by the equivalent of a 200lb wild animal when they lament the decline of marriage or bash women who aren't adequately doting. Many husbands are just horrible people, and that's leave aside how they sabotage women in nonviolent ways.

I say leave Erika Kirk alone. There's a reason she's not broken up about his death. It's not just that their marriage was a business deal (if it was). She's behaving like someone who has been held back and was just champing at the bit to be her dynamic, executive self finally. That marriage trapped her in some way.

I am sorry for your situation. And I hope you and your kids can get out and get to a good place.

But your explanation about Erika Kirk suddenly makes a lot of sense. Sometimes the death of a man is freedom. It explains a lot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good God.

Just reading the comments here makes me nauseous.
The reality is that Erika Kirk would give you idiots more grace than you even consider giving to her.
She did not ask for this role. She did not wish her husband would be murdered in front of millions so she could assume the role he once held.

How bold of you to know exactly how a widow with two young children should grieve.
I think the majority of you are just plain jealous women who have never known true love.

You really think she’d give any of us grace?

I think you are a delusional fool who doesn’t realize they are getting played.

I think you're a cynic who's projecting the way you would behave onto Ms. Kirk.

I know that I, for one, certainly don't judge a recent widow for wearing the traditional skin-tight black leather mourning pants and running her hands through the hair of a man she is grinding on at a public event.

Epitome of class and grace.

[Anonymous]

She's so disgusting. They all are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good God.

Just reading the comments here makes me nauseous.
The reality is that Erika Kirk would give you idiots more grace than you even consider giving to her.
She did not ask for this role. She did not wish her husband would be murdered in front of millions so she could assume the role he once held.

How bold of you to know exactly how a widow with two young children should grieve.
I think the majority of you are just plain jealous women who have never known true love.

Although she did not ask for this role, she's not exactly running away from it either.

She stepped into the role because this is what Charlie would have wanted. She has made that very clear.
And, her appearances are to promote the book that Charlie finished just before he was murdered.
It amazes me that the people here, who have likely never suffered a loss so significant as Erika has suffered, seem to know what she should say, how she should act, and how she should grieve. You people just have no idea.

Not true. CK believed women should not work and stay in the background. I doubt his succession plan included a woman.

The only woman he would have trusted is Candace.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To me, Erika Kirk comes off as a woman whose husband was a real a.s.shole. She's struggling in the role of grieving widow because she doesn't miss him. I know that if my husband ever dies, I'll be in for the struggle of my life to pretend I care. It's pretty stupid how spouses, especially women, are expected to be almost suicidal with grief and no one asks what the marriage was like.

Why do you stay married?

Not the PP but my close friend would have said the same thing about not mourning a death, and she couldn’t leave because the courts would have given 50/50 custody to a violently abusive man. She was scared for the lives of her children. At least when she was there, he hit her and not her daughters.

I think it is possible the same thing is true of Erika Kirk but we can’t know. She and her dead husband were against everything I stand for, but I hate the attacks on her. It’s cruel, and when I see Democrats doing it, they seem no better than Candace Owens.

Yeah that’s just bad decision making on her part. My mother was brutally abused and you know what she did? Took me and left him. No money, no future security, nothing at all. She went to another state and protected me. That’s what you do when you are facing true life/death situations. Your friend either wants attention, is overly dramatic or is incredibly stupid. If you fear that someone will kill your kids you flee for your life. You live in a remote jungle if you have to. You don’t stick around.

DP. Are you suggesting women turn fugitive and kidnap their kids? That's what taking a child out of state with no intention of returning and without the other parent's consent is. Over here in reality, most fugitives are caught. How are the children better off when Mom is in prison and sociopath Dad has sole custody?

Your Mom might have tried her best, but this vicious post you wrote to hurt a complete stranger shows you turned out as horrible as your Dad.

+1 That was shockingly nasty.

The Erika Kirk attackers like that PP are making Democrats look awful, maybe because they are as nasty as that PP. I wish they would stop.

The “Erika Kirk attacker” being discussed here is Candace Owens, who is very much not a Democrat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good God.

Just reading the comments here makes me nauseous.
The reality is that Erika Kirk would give you idiots more grace than you even consider giving to her.
She did not ask for this role. She did not wish her husband would be murdered in front of millions so she could assume the role he once held.

How bold of you to know exactly how a widow with two young children should grieve.
I think the majority of you are just plain jealous women who have never known true love.

Although she did not ask for this role, she's not exactly running away from it either.

She stepped into the role because this is what Charlie would have wanted. She has made that very clear.
And, her appearances are to promote the book that Charlie finished just before he was murdered.
It amazes me that the people here, who have likely never suffered a loss so significant as Erika has suffered, seem to know what she should say, how she should act, and how she should grieve. You people just have no idea.

Not true. CK believed women should not work and stay in the background. I doubt his succession plan included a woman.

That's a distortion of his beliefs. Ideally, kids benefit from one parent being at home to nurture kids. Of course, many families can't afford to do that, mine included.

His literal words were to tell Taylor Swift to submit to her husband. Using the Bible as an excuse for misogyny is still misogyny. There is no excusable framing for his words there. This was not a man I would want my daughter to marry.