Pamela Anderson interview

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think her age is not quite correct.

I remember her "published age" was 26 when I was around 19/20. I am 56 now so she's not 58 I think she is older.

And if she is indeed older, she looks FABULOUS

What do you think her actual age is -early 60's?

Honestly I don't know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The truth is, she looks horrific without makeup. She looks ragged and run down and so much older. And wtf happened to her eyebrows? They are nonexistent!

It is really hard to be free of pressures around aging and other social pressures when we are so hard on others. This outer voice also ends up being the inner voice we use on ourselves. If you are lucky, you will age and spend years facing yourself in the mirror first thing in the morning. Prepare yourself for years of kindness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The truth is, she looks horrific without makeup. She looks ragged and run down and so much older. And wtf happened to her eyebrows? They are nonexistent!

It is really hard to be free of pressures around aging and other social pressures when we are so hard on others. This outer voice also ends up being the inner voice we use on ourselves. If you are lucky, you will age and spend years facing yourself in the mirror first thing in the morning. Prepare yourself for years of kindness.

I agree. It’s absurd that we’re even debating a woman walking outside without makeup and that that is controversial.

You make a good point. With life expectancy rising, if we are lucky enough to live a long time, we will spend a lot more of life looking old than we will looking young. It would be nice if as the decades go on we normalize that a bit more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think what’s being missed in this conversation is Pamela Anderson going to make up free is not just the average celebrity. This is a woman who was objectified and sexualized even more than the average female celebrity, which is saying a lot.

She is really trying to strip all of that away and it is making a statement that she’s still doing red carpets, still out in the public and working and is in a viable person in her late 50s without trying to look glamorous without being known for her looks.

I recently read Brooke Shields’s memoir, and she says that periodically she meets usually a man who is surprised that she’s out and about and bordering on angry that she has gotten old. They say the most insane things to her and her theory on why is that she was known as this gorgeous young woman and that seeing her age makes them feel old and reminds them that they too are aging.

You don’t have to like it or agree with Pamela going make up free, but it is interesting that people are having strong reactions to it, both positive and negative.

You make it sound like she was some sort of victim. She wasn't.

Someone literally broke into her house and stole a private tape she made with her husband and sold it on the internet. And then she was shamed and made into a joke for it. How wasn't she a victim there?

PP here. You're being nit picky.

You mean that she was a victim of a crime, like plenty of other people often are? Sure, I can see that. I've had my home broken into too, and it's not nice. It probably hurt her more than it did me as she's in the public eye. However, that's not what I was referring to when I said she wasn't a victim.

The poster I was responding to said that Anderson was "objectified and sexualized". I highlighted that particular line because that's how she made her name and her living. This conversation is not about her house being broken into and a tape being stolen. But deep down, I'm sure you know that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not sure why the Liam Neeson 'romance' thread was locked, but she essentially confirms it was a PR relationship (describes one week at his home, in separate bedrooms) and that they are friends...

https://people.com/pamela-anderson-on-liam-neeson-relationship-exclusive-11864356

So, still a bimbo, pretending to be classy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find her "all natural" shtick so cloying and she looks horrific.

This is horrific? What is wrong with you? Please seek therapy before you destroy yourself with plastic surgery.

DP. While I didn’t write that, you must be joking if you think this looks good. A small amount of tasteful makeup would do wonders here - it’s a red carpet event, not working outside in her garden.

NP. I actually think her skin looks amazing, considering the amount of time she must have spent in the sun during her Baywatch days.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think what’s being missed in this conversation is Pamela Anderson going to make up free is not just the average celebrity. This is a woman who was objectified and sexualized even more than the average female celebrity, which is saying a lot.

She is really trying to strip all of that away and it is making a statement that she’s still doing red carpets, still out in the public and working and is in a viable person in her late 50s without trying to look glamorous without being known for her looks.

I recently read Brooke Shields’s memoir, and she says that periodically she meets usually a man who is surprised that she’s out and about and bordering on angry that she has gotten old. They say the most insane things to her and her theory on why is that she was known as this gorgeous young woman and that seeing her age makes them feel old and reminds them that they too are aging.

You don’t have to like it or agree with Pamela going make up free, but it is interesting that people are having strong reactions to it, both positive and negative.

You make it sound like she was some sort of victim. She wasn't.

Someone literally broke into her house and stole a private tape she made with her husband and sold it on the internet. And then she was shamed and made into a joke for it. How wasn't she a victim there?

PP here. You're being nit picky.

You mean that she was a victim of a crime, like plenty of other people often are? Sure, I can see that. I've had my home broken into too, and it's not nice. It probably hurt her more than it did me as she's in the public eye. However, that's not what I was referring to when I said she wasn't a victim.

The poster I was responding to said that Anderson was "objectified and sexualized". I highlighted that particular line because that's how she made her name and her living. This conversation is not about her house being broken into and a tape being stolen. But deep down, I'm sure you know that.

No that's not nitpicking. She had her private sex life broadcast all over the internet after being a victim of a crime and people like you think it's fine because she posed for Playboy, as if posing nude with consent and control is within the same ball park. Dressing sexy doesn't make the way she was treated okay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think what’s being missed in this conversation is Pamela Anderson going to make up free is not just the average celebrity. This is a woman who was objectified and sexualized even more than the average female celebrity, which is saying a lot.

She is really trying to strip all of that away and it is making a statement that she’s still doing red carpets, still out in the public and working and is in a viable person in her late 50s without trying to look glamorous without being known for her looks.

I recently read Brooke Shields’s memoir, and she says that periodically she meets usually a man who is surprised that she’s out and about and bordering on angry that she has gotten old. They say the most insane things to her and her theory on why is that she was known as this gorgeous young woman and that seeing her age makes them feel old and reminds them that they too are aging.

You don’t have to like it or agree with Pamela going make up free, but it is interesting that people are having strong reactions to it, both positive and negative.

You make it sound like she was some sort of victim. She wasn't.

Someone literally broke into her house and stole a private tape she made with her husband and sold it on the internet. And then she was shamed and made into a joke for it. How wasn't she a victim there?

PP here. You're being nit picky.

You mean that she was a victim of a crime, like plenty of other people often are? Sure, I can see that. I've had my home broken into too, and it's not nice. It probably hurt her more than it did me as she's in the public eye. However, that's not what I was referring to when I said she wasn't a victim.

The poster I was responding to said that Anderson was "objectified and sexualized". I highlighted that particular line because that's how she made her name and her living. This conversation is not about her house being broken into and a tape being stolen. But deep down, I'm sure you know that.

No that's not nitpicking. She had her private sex life broadcast all over the internet after being a victim of a crime and people like you think it's fine because she posed for Playboy, as if posing nude with consent and control is within the same ball park. Dressing sexy doesn't make the way she was treated okay.

People like me? Now you're jumping to conclusions. I've never thought ever, that it was fine that her private sex life was broadcast over the internet. I've explained my comments already so I don't know what else to tell you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find her "all natural" shtick so cloying and she looks horrific.

Not wearing makeup is our natural state. How is that a shtick or cloying?

This^. It's refreshing to see a celebrity trying to look like a human not a Kardashian doll.

+1 Not everyone admires fish lips, blow up butts, and bubble boobs.

All of which Pamela Anderson proudly sported not that long ago.

She never had Kardashian fish lips and a blow up balloon butt(s).

Oh, please. She had a blow up everything and you know it. And some of you are pretending she didn’t very much seek to be sexualized - spare us! Of course she did. She wasn’t some kind of victim who was made to dress a certain way.

I mean, great that she is no longer living that lifestyle, but cut out the revisionist history that she was somehow forced to look and behave a certain way.

She never in her life had the big balloon butt and puckered fish lips of the Kardashian women.

Do continue to split hairs - she had enormous fake breasts, fake hair, fake everything.

LOL we can tell you like balloon butts!!

Gross, no I think the balloon butts, balloon breasts, and balloon lips are awful. Weird that you seem fixated on the Kardashians and not the subject of this thread:

She looks nothing like the Kardashian crowd with their fish lips and huge inflatable rears.

Again - why do you keep bringing up the Kardashians? They are one level of gross. Pamela Anderson 1.0 is another.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find her "all natural" shtick so cloying and she looks horrific.

This is horrific? What is wrong with you? Please seek therapy before you destroy yourself with plastic surgery.

DP. While I didn’t write that, you must be joking if you think this looks good. A small amount of tasteful makeup would do wonders here - it’s a red carpet event, not working outside in her garden.

This is what she looks like without even trying. You're just mad you have to spend hours to look a fraction as good. And then you look 10times worse when you wash it all off.

Pam, you’ve been on this thread constantly. I’m not mad at all that you choose to go makeup free in the most inappropriate places. It’s just a fact that it looks awful. Also, you sound like a middle schooler.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think what’s being missed in this conversation is Pamela Anderson going to make up free is not just the average celebrity. This is a woman who was objectified and sexualized even more than the average female celebrity, which is saying a lot.

She is really trying to strip all of that away and it is making a statement that she’s still doing red carpets, still out in the public and working and is in a viable person in her late 50s without trying to look glamorous without being known for her looks.

I recently read Brooke Shields’s memoir, and she says that periodically she meets usually a man who is surprised that she’s out and about and bordering on angry that she has gotten old. They say the most insane things to her and her theory on why is that she was known as this gorgeous young woman and that seeing her age makes them feel old and reminds them that they too are aging.

You don’t have to like it or agree with Pamela going make up free, but it is interesting that people are having strong reactions to it, both positive and negative.

You make it sound like she was some sort of victim. She wasn't.

Someone literally broke into her house and stole a private tape she made with her husband and sold it on the internet. And then she was shamed and made into a joke for it. How wasn't she a victim there?

PP here. You're being nit picky.

You mean that she was a victim of a crime, like plenty of other people often are? Sure, I can see that. I've had my home broken into too, and it's not nice. It probably hurt her more than it did me as she's in the public eye. However, that's not what I was referring to when I said she wasn't a victim.

The poster I was responding to said that Anderson was "objectified and sexualized". I highlighted that particular line because that's how she made her name and her living. This conversation is not about her house being broken into and a tape being stolen. But deep down, I'm sure you know that.

+1000
I love this rewriting of her story in which we are now supposed to believe she wasn’t a proud sex symbol in Hollywood for decades. Spare us all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think what’s being missed in this conversation is Pamela Anderson going to make up free is not just the average celebrity. This is a woman who was objectified and sexualized even more than the average female celebrity, which is saying a lot.

She is really trying to strip all of that away and it is making a statement that she’s still doing red carpets, still out in the public and working and is in a viable person in her late 50s without trying to look glamorous without being known for her looks.

I recently read Brooke Shields’s memoir, and she says that periodically she meets usually a man who is surprised that she’s out and about and bordering on angry that she has gotten old. They say the most insane things to her and her theory on why is that she was known as this gorgeous young woman and that seeing her age makes them feel old and reminds them that they too are aging.

You don’t have to like it or agree with Pamela going make up free, but it is interesting that people are having strong reactions to it, both positive and negative.

You make it sound like she was some sort of victim. She wasn't.

Someone literally broke into her house and stole a private tape she made with her husband and sold it on the internet. And then she was shamed and made into a joke for it. How wasn't she a victim there?

PP here. You're being nit picky.

You mean that she was a victim of a crime, like plenty of other people often are? Sure, I can see that. I've had my home broken into too, and it's not nice. It probably hurt her more than it did me as she's in the public eye. However, that's not what I was referring to when I said she wasn't a victim.

The poster I was responding to said that Anderson was "objectified and sexualized". I highlighted that particular line because that's how she made her name and her living. This conversation is not about her house being broken into and a tape being stolen. But deep down, I'm sure you know that.

+1000
I love this rewriting of her story in which we are now supposed to believe she wasn’t a proud sex symbol in Hollywood for decades. Spare us all.

Being a sex symbol isn't consent to having pornographic videos of you shared. That's the issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think her age is not quite correct.

I remember her "published age" was 26 when I was around 19/20. I am 56 now so she's not 58 I think she is older.

And if she is indeed older, she looks FABULOUS

She made the local news from birth as she was the baby born on Canada's centennial- so she was born 1967/07/01. She really is 58 and looks great and is a sweet person. (And no I'm not her- she doesn't give a rip about random people processing their feelings about her appearance).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think what’s being missed in this conversation is Pamela Anderson going to make up free is not just the average celebrity. This is a woman who was objectified and sexualized even more than the average female celebrity, which is saying a lot.

She is really trying to strip all of that away and it is making a statement that she’s still doing red carpets, still out in the public and working and is in a viable person in her late 50s without trying to look glamorous without being known for her looks.

I recently read Brooke Shields’s memoir, and she says that periodically she meets usually a man who is surprised that she’s out and about and bordering on angry that she has gotten old. They say the most insane things to her and her theory on why is that she was known as this gorgeous young woman and that seeing her age makes them feel old and reminds them that they too are aging.

You don’t have to like it or agree with Pamela going make up free, but it is interesting that people are having strong reactions to it, both positive and negative.

You make it sound like she was some sort of victim. She wasn't.

Someone literally broke into her house and stole a private tape she made with her husband and sold it on the internet. And then she was shamed and made into a joke for it. How wasn't she a victim there?

PP here. You're being nit picky.

You mean that she was a victim of a crime, like plenty of other people often are? Sure, I can see that. I've had my home broken into too, and it's not nice. It probably hurt her more than it did me as she's in the public eye. However, that's not what I was referring to when I said she wasn't a victim.

The poster I was responding to said that Anderson was "objectified and sexualized". I highlighted that particular line because that's how she made her name and her living. This conversation is not about her house being broken into and a tape being stolen. But deep down, I'm sure you know that.

+1000
I love this rewriting of her story in which we are now supposed to believe she wasn’t a proud sex symbol in Hollywood for decades. Spare us all.

Being a sex symbol isn't consent to having pornographic videos of you shared. That's the issue.

It was terrible that someone broke into her home and someone stole and exploited her sex tape. No one on here has said otherwise. Just because someone stole her sex tape, does not magically erase all of the purposeful decisions she made to exploit and profit off her own sexuality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think what’s being missed in this conversation is Pamela Anderson going to make up free is not just the average celebrity. This is a woman who was objectified and sexualized even more than the average female celebrity, which is saying a lot.

She is really trying to strip all of that away and it is making a statement that she’s still doing red carpets, still out in the public and working and is in a viable person in her late 50s without trying to look glamorous without being known for her looks.

I recently read Brooke Shields’s memoir, and she says that periodically she meets usually a man who is surprised that she’s out and about and bordering on angry that she has gotten old. They say the most insane things to her and her theory on why is that she was known as this gorgeous young woman and that seeing her age makes them feel old and reminds them that they too are aging.

You don’t have to like it or agree with Pamela going make up free, but it is interesting that people are having strong reactions to it, both positive and negative.

You make it sound like she was some sort of victim. She wasn't.

Someone literally broke into her house and stole a private tape she made with her husband and sold it on the internet. And then she was shamed and made into a joke for it. How wasn't she a victim there?

PP here. You're being nit picky.

You mean that she was a victim of a crime, like plenty of other people often are? Sure, I can see that. I've had my home broken into too, and it's not nice. It probably hurt her more than it did me as she's in the public eye. However, that's not what I was referring to when I said she wasn't a victim.

The poster I was responding to said that Anderson was "objectified and sexualized". I highlighted that particular line because that's how she made her name and her living. This conversation is not about her house being broken into and a tape being stolen. But deep down, I'm sure you know that.

+1000
I love this rewriting of her story in which we are now supposed to believe she wasn’t a proud sex symbol in Hollywood for decades. Spare us all.

Being a sex symbol isn't consent to having pornographic videos of you shared. That's the issue.

At this point, no one cares. Sorry.