Pamela Anderson interview

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find her "all natural" shtick so cloying and she looks horrific.

Not wearing makeup is our natural state. How is that a shtick or cloying?

This^. It's refreshing to see a celebrity trying to look like a human not a Kardashian doll.

+1 Not everyone admires fish lips, blow up butts, and bubble boobs.

All of which Pamela Anderson proudly sported not that long ago.

She never had Kardashian fish lips and a blow up balloon butt(s).

Oh, please. She had a blow up everything and you know it. And some of you are pretending she didn’t very much seek to be sexualized - spare us! Of course she did. She wasn’t some kind of victim who was made to dress a certain way.

I mean, great that she is no longer living that lifestyle, but cut out the revisionist history that she was somehow forced to look and behave a certain way.

She never in her life had the big balloon butt and puckered fish lips of the Kardashian women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The truth is, she looks horrific without makeup. She looks ragged and run down and so much older. And wtf happened to her eyebrows? They are nonexistent!

She looks great for her age, just not an artificial made up beauty. Her eyebrows are gone due to over plucking of decades as many of women her age and she isn't drawing artificial ones.

Also menopause. Hair loss/hair thinning, including the eyebrows.

These comments (referencing the "she looks horrific" ones) are all so horrible, jesus.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find her "all natural" shtick so cloying and she looks horrific.

Not wearing makeup is our natural state. How is that a shtick or cloying?

This^. It's refreshing to see a celebrity trying to look like a human not a Kardashian doll.

+1 Not everyone admires fish lips, blow up butts, and bubble boobs.

All of which Pamela Anderson proudly sported not that long ago.

She never had Kardashian fish lips and a blow up balloon butt(s).

Oh, please. She had a blow up everything and you know it. And some of you are pretending she didn’t very much seek to be sexualized - spare us! Of course she did. She wasn’t some kind of victim who was made to dress a certain way.

I mean, great that she is no longer living that lifestyle, but cut out the revisionist history that she was somehow forced to look and behave a certain way.

She never in her life had the big balloon butt and puckered fish lips of the Kardashian women.

Her heyday was decades before the Kardashians. She made way for the Kardashians to exist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find her "all natural" shtick so cloying and she looks horrific.

Not wearing makeup is our natural state. How is that a shtick or cloying?

This^. It's refreshing to see a celebrity trying to look like a human not a Kardashian doll.

+1 Not everyone admires fish lips, blow up butts, and bubble boobs.

All of which Pamela Anderson proudly sported not that long ago.

She never had Kardashian fish lips and a blow up balloon butt(s).

Oh, please. She had a blow up everything and you know it. And some of you are pretending she didn’t very much seek to be sexualized - spare us! Of course she did. She wasn’t some kind of victim who was made to dress a certain way.

I mean, great that she is no longer living that lifestyle, but cut out the revisionist history that she was somehow forced to look and behave a certain way.

She never in her life had the big balloon butt and puckered fish lips of the Kardashian women.

Do continue to split hairs - she had enormous fake breasts, fake hair, fake everything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find her "all natural" shtick so cloying and she looks horrific.

Not wearing makeup is our natural state. How is that a shtick or cloying?

This^. It's refreshing to see a celebrity trying to look like a human not a Kardashian doll.

+1 Not everyone admires fish lips, blow up butts, and bubble boobs.

All of which Pamela Anderson proudly sported not that long ago.

She never had Kardashian fish lips and a blow up balloon butt(s).

Oh, please. She had a blow up everything and you know it. And some of you are pretending she didn’t very much seek to be sexualized - spare us! Of course she did. She wasn’t some kind of victim who was made to dress a certain way.

I mean, great that she is no longer living that lifestyle, but cut out the revisionist history that she was somehow forced to look and behave a certain way.

She never in her life had the big balloon butt and puckered fish lips of the Kardashian women.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find her "all natural" shtick so cloying and she looks horrific.

Not wearing makeup is our natural state. How is that a shtick or cloying?

This^. It's refreshing to see a celebrity trying to look like a human not a Kardashian doll.

+1 Not everyone admires fish lips, blow up butts, and bubble boobs.

All of which Pamela Anderson proudly sported not that long ago.

She never had Kardashian fish lips and a blow up balloon butt(s).

Oh, please. She had a blow up everything and you know it. And some of you are pretending she didn’t very much seek to be sexualized - spare us! Of course she did. She wasn’t some kind of victim who was made to dress a certain way.

I mean, great that she is no longer living that lifestyle, but cut out the revisionist history that she was somehow forced to look and behave a certain way.

She never in her life had the big balloon butt and puckered fish lips of the Kardashian women.

Do continue to split hairs - she had enormous fake breasts, fake hair, fake everything.

LOL we can tell you like balloon butts!!

[Anonymous]

I think her age is not quite correct.

I remember her "published age" was 26 when I was around 19/20. I am 56 now so she's not 58 I think she is older.

And if she is indeed older, she looks FABULOUS

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find her "all natural" shtick so cloying and she looks horrific.

Not wearing makeup is our natural state. How is that a shtick or cloying?

This^. It's refreshing to see a celebrity trying to look like a human not a Kardashian doll.

+1 Not everyone admires fish lips, blow up butts, and bubble boobs.

All of which Pamela Anderson proudly sported not that long ago.

She never had Kardashian fish lips and a blow up balloon butt(s).

Oh, please. She had a blow up everything and you know it. And some of you are pretending she didn’t very much seek to be sexualized - spare us! Of course she did. She wasn’t some kind of victim who was made to dress a certain way.

I mean, great that she is no longer living that lifestyle, but cut out the revisionist history that she was somehow forced to look and behave a certain way.

She never in her life had the big balloon butt and puckered fish lips of the Kardashian women.

+1

+1 totally different body shape

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find her "all natural" shtick so cloying and she looks horrific.

Not wearing makeup is our natural state. How is that a shtick or cloying?

This^. It's refreshing to see a celebrity trying to look like a human not a Kardashian doll.

+1 Not everyone admires fish lips, blow up butts, and bubble boobs.

All of which Pamela Anderson proudly sported not that long ago.

She never had Kardashian fish lips and a blow up balloon butt(s).

Oh, please. She had a blow up everything and you know it. And some of you are pretending she didn’t very much seek to be sexualized - spare us! Of course she did. She wasn’t some kind of victim who was made to dress a certain way.

I mean, great that she is no longer living that lifestyle, but cut out the revisionist history that she was somehow forced to look and behave a certain way.

She never in her life had the big balloon butt and puckered fish lips of the Kardashian women.

Do continue to split hairs - she had enormous fake breasts, fake hair, fake everything.

LOL we can tell you like balloon butts!!

Gross, no I think the balloon butts, balloon breasts, and balloon lips are awful. Weird that you seem fixated on the Kardashians and not the subject of this thread:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did anyone ask care about a washed up actress from the 80's???

She recently received a SAG nomination, significant accomplishment.

And a Golden Globe nomination for Best Actress in a Drama. She was good in The Last Showgirl.

I wouldn’t call her “washed up” at this stage in her life.

Yasmin Bleeth is more of a washed up actress imo.
Pamela has hit some new strides this far into her career.
She has proven that she is more than just a Playboy centerfold - - she earned a Golden Globe nomination plus she ditched her makeup which is super brave for any celebrity to do > most especially one in her fifties.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think her age is not quite correct.

I remember her "published age" was 26 when I was around 19/20. I am 56 now so she's not 58 I think she is older.

And if she is indeed older, she looks FABULOUS

What do you think her actual age is -early 60's?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find her "all natural" shtick so cloying and she looks horrific.

Not wearing makeup is our natural state. How is that a shtick or cloying?

This^. It's refreshing to see a celebrity trying to look like a human not a Kardashian doll.

+1 Not everyone admires fish lips, blow up butts, and bubble boobs.

All of which Pamela Anderson proudly sported not that long ago.

She never had Kardashian fish lips and a blow up balloon butt(s).

Oh, please. She had a blow up everything and you know it. And some of you are pretending she didn’t very much seek to be sexualized - spare us! Of course she did. She wasn’t some kind of victim who was made to dress a certain way.

I mean, great that she is no longer living that lifestyle, but cut out the revisionist history that she was somehow forced to look and behave a certain way.

She never in her life had the big balloon butt and puckered fish lips of the Kardashian women.

Do continue to split hairs - she had enormous fake breasts, fake hair, fake everything.

LOL we can tell you like balloon butts!!

Gross, no I think the balloon butts, balloon breasts, and balloon lips are awful. Weird that you seem fixated on the Kardashians and not the subject of this thread:

She looks nothing like the Kardashian crowd with their fish lips and huge inflatable rears.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think what’s being missed in this conversation is Pamela Anderson going to make up free is not just the average celebrity. This is a woman who was objectified and sexualized even more than the average female celebrity, which is saying a lot.

She is really trying to strip all of that away and it is making a statement that she’s still doing red carpets, still out in the public and working and is in a viable person in her late 50s without trying to look glamorous without being known for her looks.

I recently read Brooke Shields’s memoir, and she says that periodically she meets usually a man who is surprised that she’s out and about and bordering on angry that she has gotten old. They say the most insane things to her and her theory on why is that she was known as this gorgeous young woman and that seeing her age makes them feel old and reminds them that they too are aging.

You don’t have to like it or agree with Pamela going make up free, but it is interesting that people are having strong reactions to it, both positive and negative.

You make it sound like she was some sort of victim. She wasn't.

Someone literally broke into her house and stole a private tape she made with her husband and sold it on the internet. And then she was shamed and made into a joke for it. How wasn't she a victim there?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think what’s being missed in this conversation is Pamela Anderson going to make up free is not just the average celebrity. This is a woman who was objectified and sexualized even more than the average female celebrity, which is saying a lot.

She is really trying to strip all of that away and it is making a statement that she’s still doing red carpets, still out in the public and working and is in a viable person in her late 50s without trying to look glamorous without being known for her looks.

I recently read Brooke Shields’s memoir, and she says that periodically she meets usually a man who is surprised that she’s out and about and bordering on angry that she has gotten old. They say the most insane things to her and her theory on why is that she was known as this gorgeous young woman and that seeing her age makes them feel old and reminds them that they too are aging.

You don’t have to like it or agree with Pamela going make up free, but it is interesting that people are having strong reactions to it, both positive and negative.

You make it sound like she was some sort of victim. She wasn't.

Someone literally broke into her house and stole a private tape she made with her husband and sold it on the internet. And then she was shamed and made into a joke for it. How wasn't she a victim there?

She was actually told she had no legal recourse because she posed for Playboy so she must be fine with it.

Sorry, but she was definitely a victim.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find her "all natural" shtick so cloying and she looks horrific.

This is horrific? What is wrong with you? Please seek therapy before you destroy yourself with plastic surgery.

DP. While I didn’t write that, you must be joking if you think this looks good. A small amount of tasteful makeup would do wonders here - it’s a red carpet event, not working outside in her garden.

This is what she looks like without even trying. You're just mad you have to spend hours to look a fraction as good. And then you look 10times worse when you wash it all off.