Do ex-Sorority girls make good wife material?? Or stay away??

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is hard to generalize, but the stereotypical sorority girl (especially in the South) is perfect wife material. Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish.
The perfect wife IMHO.


Awful. But water finds its own level.


sorry you weren't chosen for the sorority(ies) you wanted. but don't let that define you.


DP. You presented a very white Southern stereotype of a sorority, which says more about you than about any of the women you address.


well that is an interesting take. here is what I presented:

"Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish."

in my experience, that describes sorority girls of all races. are you saying that non-Whites lack those traits or don't value them?



That is not how many Black service-oriented sororities would describe their priorities, so no.

If you want to make racist assumptions, such as that the sororities which "count" as sororities are image-based, sex-based, and snobbish, then you do you.n It's gross, but a lot of people are gross, and here we are.


so it's always about race - you sound a bit gross and racist yourself
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is hard to generalize, but the stereotypical sorority girl (especially in the South) is perfect wife material. Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish.
The perfect wife IMHO.


Awful. But water finds its own level.


sorry you weren't chosen for the sorority(ies) you wanted. but don't let that define you.


DP. You presented a very white Southern stereotype of a sorority, which says more about you than about any of the women you address.


well that is an interesting take. here is what I presented:

"Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish."

in my experience, that describes sorority girls of all races. are you saying that non-Whites lack those traits or don't value them?



That is not how many Black service-oriented sororities would describe their priorities, so no.

If you want to make racist assumptions, such as that the sororities which "count" as sororities are image-based, sex-based, and snobbish, then you do you.n It's gross, but a lot of people are gross, and here we are.


so it's always about race - you sound a bit gross and racist yourself


You could think about what PP said, or you could get triggered when called out on it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is hard to generalize, but the stereotypical sorority girl (especially in the South) is perfect wife material. Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish.
The perfect wife IMHO.


Awful. But water finds its own level.


sorry you weren't chosen for the sorority(ies) you wanted. but don't let that define you.


DP. You presented a very white Southern stereotype of a sorority, which says more about you than about any of the women you address.


well that is an interesting take. here is what I presented:

"Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish."

in my experience, that describes sorority girls of all races. are you saying that non-Whites lack those traits or don't value them?



That is not how many Black service-oriented sororities would describe their priorities, so no.

If you want to make racist assumptions, such as that the sororities which "count" as sororities are image-based, sex-based, and snobbish, then you do you.n It's gross, but a lot of people are gross, and here we are.


so it's always about race - you sound a bit gross and racist yourself


You could think about what PP said, or you could get triggered when called out on it.


I think the person who needs a trigger warning is the one who got upset by the description of sorority girls as pretty, family oriented, social, and so forth. like it or not, that is how sorority girls are perceived.
Anonymous
[img]
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is hard to generalize, but the stereotypical sorority girl (especially in the South) is perfect wife material. Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish.
The perfect wife IMHO.


Awful. But water finds its own level.


sorry you weren't chosen for the sorority(ies) you wanted. but don't let that define you.


DP. You presented a very white Southern stereotype of a sorority, which says more about you than about any of the women you address.


well that is an interesting take. here is what I presented:

"Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish."

in my experience, that describes sorority girls of all races. are you saying that non-Whites lack those traits or don't value them?



That is not how many Black service-oriented sororities would describe their priorities, so no.

If you want to make racist assumptions, such as that the sororities which "count" as sororities are image-based, sex-based, and snobbish, then you do you.n It's gross, but a lot of people are gross, and here we are.


so it's always about race - you sound a bit gross and racist yourself


You could think about what PP said, or you could get triggered when called out on it.


I think the person who needs a trigger warning is the one who got upset by the description of sorority girls as pretty, family oriented, social, and so forth. like it or not, that is how sorority girls are perceived.


She disagreed with you and explained why. You just name called.
Anonymous
They’re usually wh*res, so that’s not really wife material for most men but maybe you have low standards.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:[img]
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is hard to generalize, but the stereotypical sorority girl (especially in the South) is perfect wife material. Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish.
The perfect wife IMHO.


Awful. But water finds its own level.


sorry you weren't chosen for the sorority(ies) you wanted. but don't let that define you.


DP. You presented a very white Southern stereotype of a sorority, which says more about you than about any of the women you address.


well that is an interesting take. here is what I presented:

"Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish."

in my experience, that describes sorority girls of all races. are you saying that non-Whites lack those traits or don't value them?



That is not how many Black service-oriented sororities would describe their priorities, so no.

If you want to make racist assumptions, such as that the sororities which "count" as sororities are image-based, sex-based, and snobbish, then you do you.n It's gross, but a lot of people are gross, and here we are.


so it's always about race - you sound a bit gross and racist yourself


You could think about what PP said, or you could get triggered when called out on it.


I think the person who needs a trigger warning is the one who got upset by the description of sorority girls as pretty, family oriented, social, and so forth. like it or not, that is how sorority girls are perceived.


She disagreed with you and explained why. You just name called.


she did more than disagree - she called me gross and racist, and she first brought race into the discussion when it really wasn't necessary. go back and read for yourself.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:They’re usually wh*res, so that’s not really wife material for most men but maybe you have low standards.


who are usually wh*res?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is hard to generalize, but the stereotypical sorority girl (especially in the South) is perfect wife material. Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish.
The perfect wife IMHO.


Awful. But water finds its own level.


sorry you weren't chosen for the sorority(ies) you wanted. but don't let that define you.


DP. You presented a very white Southern stereotype of a sorority, which says more about you than about any of the women you address.


well that is an interesting take. here is what I presented:

"Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish."

in my experience, that describes sorority girls of all races. are you saying that non-Whites lack those traits or don't value them?



That is not how many Black service-oriented sororities would describe their priorities, so no.

If you want to make racist assumptions, such as that the sororities which "count" as sororities are image-based, sex-based, and snobbish, then you do you.n It's gross, but a lot of people are gross, and here we are.


are you saying that Black sororities focus more on community service than White ones? having gone to a school with a lot of fraternities and sororities, that is not my experience.
Anonymous
I think ex-sorrority girls probably make great wives. They’re pretty well rounded by the time they get out of college. They’ve had to focus on everything from academic achievement to community service, community building, being a part of something, etc. They also care about their appearance and learn to work within a beauty biased environment - which can be tough.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is hard to generalize, but the stereotypical sorority girl (especially in the South) is perfect wife material. Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish.
The perfect wife IMHO.


Awful. But water finds its own level.


sorry you weren't chosen for the sorority(ies) you wanted. but don't let that define you.


Ha! I went to Wellesley. No Greek life.


Were you a lesbian even before going to Wellesley? (not that there’s anything wrong with that).


very funny. but seriously, a discussion of "wife material" does depend on the gender and sexual preference of the person looking. a heterosexual man is more likely think sorority girl from a SEC school as wife material. but a lesbian woman is more likely to find a good wife at Wellesley.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is hard to generalize, but the stereotypical sorority girl (especially in the South) is perfect wife material. Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish.
The perfect wife IMHO.


Awful. But water finds its own level.


sorry you weren't chosen for the sorority(ies) you wanted. but don't let that define you.


Ha! I went to Wellesley. No Greek life.


Were you a lesbian even before going to Wellesley? (not that there’s anything wrong with that).


I was not a lesbian before, during, or after Wellesley. Married 17 years to a man.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is hard to generalize, but the stereotypical sorority girl (especially in the South) is perfect wife material. Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish.
The perfect wife IMHO.


Awful. But water finds its own level.


sorry you weren't chosen for the sorority(ies) you wanted. but don't let that define you.


DP. You presented a very white Southern stereotype of a sorority, which says more about you than about any of the women you address.


well that is an interesting take. here is what I presented:

"Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish."

in my experience, that describes sorority girls of all races. are you saying that non-Whites lack those traits or don't value them?



That is not how many Black service-oriented sororities would describe their priorities, so no.

If you want to make racist assumptions, such as that the sororities which "count" as sororities are image-based, sex-based, and snobbish, then you do you.n It's gross, but a lot of people are gross, and here we are.


And firstly focused on EXCLUSION.

Even their damn non-free alumni events you can’t bring a best friend who lives in the same town you flew in to to attend a drinks event.
Anonymous
Most sororities and most of their alumnae are focused on conformity and exclusion. And vastly raise their sons and daughters the same way.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I think ex-sorrority girls probably make great wives. They’re pretty well rounded by the time they get out of college. They’ve had to focus on everything from academic achievement to community service, community building, being a part of something, etc. They also care about their appearance and learn to work within a beauty biased environment - which can be tough.


Lolz
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is hard to generalize, but the stereotypical sorority girl (especially in the South) is perfect wife material. Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish.
The perfect wife IMHO.


Awful. But water finds its own level.


sorry you weren't chosen for the sorority(ies) you wanted. but don't let that define you.


DP. You presented a very white Southern stereotype of a sorority, which says more about you than about any of the women you address.


well that is an interesting take. here is what I presented:

"Beautiful, family oriented, social, sexy, well dressed, cares what people think of her, and just a tiny bit snobbish."

in my experience, that describes sorority girls of all races. are you saying that non-Whites lack those traits or don't value them?



That is not how many Black service-oriented sororities would describe their priorities, so no.

If you want to make racist assumptions, such as that the sororities which "count" as sororities are image-based, sex-based, and snobbish, then you do you.n It's gross, but a lot of people are gross, and here we are.


And firstly focused on EXCLUSION.

Even their damn non-free alumni events you can’t bring a best friend who lives in the same town you flew in to to attend a drinks event.


I can't follow what you are saying. it sounds like you weren't allowed to bring a friend to an alumni event, which sounds pretty chintzy on the part of the sorority, so I am sorry to hear that happened to you.

but how does that relate to the dialogue - can you try again?
post reply Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: