| Have you ever trimmed a tree OP? They grow back quickly. |
| I had a similar situation but our trees slowly died as the trimmers did not know what they did. I had the trees removed and then built a six foot fence about four feet into our property with two gates. We store our trash cans and our yard stuff inside the area. Since we have only the fence on our side, they have no fence and the trash and other material our visible from their screen porch. Since their yard slopes down from our side, they would have to build a very tall and expensive fence to screen these items. They complain to us constantly and suggest they plant trees. |
Pine limbs do not regrow. Haven’t you ever trimmed a tree. Idiot. |
Wow. |
+1 it doesn’t matter whether or not OP trims her trees or not. You still cannot treapass onto somebody’s property and alter, damage, kill, trim, or do anything to their property. Doing so is illegal and entitled. I see a lot of entitled people here. |
| Sometimes landscapers go rogue. Ours did something similar to what you are describing (cut back a branch that was on our neighbor's side but provided too much shade on our side) and our neighbor was really pissed. We had no idea he was cutting the whole branch back, we thought he would just do the small portion that goes over our deck. |
Not an entire branch that was cut off, PP. You clearly don't know what you're talking about. |
Watch out for bamboo!! A previous owner planted bamboo at our house. A few years later, it was growing everywhere!! I can't explain how difficult and expensive it was to have it removed (no one wanted to touch the job). DH has to continually monitor the area where it was removed and dig up new pod sprouts. |
Agreed. It seems many people lost coherence. |
| This is a tough one. Obviously trespassing onto your land and cutting your tree is totally unacceptable, and you would be well within your rights to take them to court. On the other hand, you probably won’t recover much in damages—it seems to me vanishingly unlikely a court would make them pay to replace the damaged trees with new mature ones—and you do have to live with them going forward. Probably the mature thing to do is swallow hard and let it go, despite how badly that sucks. Sunk cost now, and the more you think about it, the more it’s going to bother you, which just makes your life worse and does nothing to them. |
Actually, on second thought maybe just take the landscaper to small claims court and leave your neighbors out of it. They are the ones who trespassed, and they may well cause trouble for your neighbor that isn’t really your fault. |
What?? What on earth would give *anyone* the notion that they can touch in any way a neighbor's trees/plants/etc?? I think I would have laughed in their face right then and there. |
OP here. The previous owners liked the full trees/privacy screening from their side too. They didn't want the branches to be cut, so we never did. The new owner is certainly within his rights to cut the branches on HIS side for whatever reason - but he is NOT entitled to do the same our side of the trees. |
+100 Very much so. Honestly, in my years on DCUM, I've noticed a particular type of poster - the contrarian, who decides to spin things in a certain way so that s/he can be argumentative. They don't actually read the facts as laid out, they simply make up their own. |
But that's not what the issue is here. You are within your rights to cut anything that falls/grows into your property. But you're not allowed to cut anything on the neighbor's side. |