Tulsi Gabbard endorses Trump. Will join campaign

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Gabbard's being soft on Assad makes her poisonous.

Not to MAGA.
As long as she pledges fealty to the convicted felon, she is a-ok.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Gabbard's being soft on Assad makes her poisonous.

I dislike her , but at this point, not a single American who supports the Dems or Reps is in any position to comment about that if you support what has been done to Palestinians for 75 years. Media and govt can lie all it wants about it, but hundreds of billions along with disgraceful laws and vetoes have been spent for a brutal occupation to steal everything from them including their lives. No American is allowed to lie to themselves about what they actually support, and it ain’t democracy in the case of what has always gone on over there. Whatever stupidity comes from campus protests doesn’t negate the lies and evil the American people have supported against a people who never did a f***ing thing to them and can’t see the media trained them over generations to treat the far more powerful side as the victims. They never were.

[Anonymous]

I’d love to see a Gabbard Harris debate again. Tulsi owned her last time, this time would be even worse so she can even do an unscripted interview and wants notecards for the debate.


I hope Tulsi at least gets press secretary.
Trump,

Vance - a never Trumper
RFK - Kennedy Democrat
TG - Democrat
Elon - liberal tech , makes electric cars, global warming believer



This is unity.

They’re up against a creepy guy from Minnesota who lied about his service and let BLM destroy his state

The other a failed prosecutor who couldn’t win her state so was appointed as the nominee despite no one voting for her. Oh and her senile boss…

Trump 2024

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let's be honest, nobody should be excited about any of them - Trump, Vance, RFK, Gabbard, Harris, Walz, or Biden. For different reasons, nobody on that list is a good candidate to be President. Anybody who says otherwise is a sheer partisan.

Serious question - is there anybody alive who would be a genuinely good candidate, respected by reasonable people on both sides?

Those people are too smart for politics.

Harris & Walz are great options.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’d love to see a Gabbard Harris debate again. Tulsi owned her last time, this time would be even worse so she can even do an unscripted interview and wants notecards for the debate.


I hope Tulsi at least gets press secretary.
Trump,

Vance - a never Trumper
RFK - Kennedy Democrat
TG - Democrat
Elon - liberal tech , makes electric cars, global warming believer



This is unity.

They’re up against a creepy guy from Minnesota who lied about his service and let BLM destroy his state

The other a failed prosecutor who couldn’t win her state so was appointed as the nominee despite no one voting for her. Oh and her senile boss…

Trump 2024

OMG who could possibly take you seriously?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gabbard's being soft on Assad makes her poisonous.

I dislike her , but at this point, not a single American who supports the Dems or Reps is in any position to comment about that if you support what has been done to Palestinians for 75 years. Media and govt can lie all it wants about it, but hundreds of billions along with disgraceful laws and vetoes have been spent for a brutal occupation to steal everything from them including their lives. No American is allowed to lie to themselves about what they actually support, and it ain’t democracy in the case of what has always gone on over there. Whatever stupidity comes from campus protests doesn’t negate the lies and evil the American people have supported against a people who never did a f***ing thing to them and can’t see the media trained them over generations to treat the far more powerful side as the victims. They never were.

Remember when Pelosi went there and met with Assad? She called him a great reformer.

I remember

https://www.reuters.com/article/economy/uss-pelosi-meets-syrias-assad-iraq-prominent-idUSL04321424/

The Bush admin told her not to and she did. She gushed and sang his praises.

You may not remember but Pepperidge farm remembers…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’d love to see a Gabbard Harris debate again. Tulsi owned her last time, this time would be even worse so she can even do an unscripted interview and wants notecards for the debate.


I hope Tulsi at least gets press secretary.
Trump,

Vance - a never Trumper
RFK - Kennedy Democrat
TG - Democrat
Elon - liberal tech , makes electric cars, global warming believer



This is unity.

They’re up against a creepy guy from Minnesota who lied about his service and let BLM destroy his state

The other a failed prosecutor who couldn’t win her state so was appointed as the nominee despite no one voting for her. Oh and her senile boss…

Trump 2024

Creepy guy? Walz?? Vs. Trump, Vance, and RFK??? Your psychosis is fascinating.

[Anonymous]

You know nothing about politics OP. Those went loon before the last election and RFK Jr. did years ago. Lame try.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d love to see a Gabbard Harris debate again. Tulsi owned her last time, this time would be even worse so she can even do an unscripted interview and wants notecards for the debate.


I hope Tulsi at least gets press secretary.
Trump,

Vance - a never Trumper
RFK - Kennedy Democrat
TG - Democrat
Elon - liberal tech , makes electric cars, global warming believer



This is unity.

They’re up against a creepy guy from Minnesota who lied about his service and let BLM destroy his state

The other a failed prosecutor who couldn’t win her state so was appointed as the nominee despite no one voting for her. Oh and her senile boss…

Trump 2024

Creepy guy? Walz?? Vs. Trump, Vance, and RFK??? Your psychosis is fascinating.

I bet there will be some interesting research into this in years to come.

[Anonymous]

I am old enough to remember when Mitt Romney called Gabbad a Russian propagandist.

The gop is circling the drain with this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’d love to see a Gabbard Harris debate again. Tulsi owned her last time, this time would be even worse so she can even do an unscripted interview and wants notecards for the debate.


I hope Tulsi at least gets press secretary.
Trump,

Vance - a never Trumper
RFK - Kennedy Democrat
TG - Democrat
Elon - liberal tech , makes electric cars, global warming believer



This is unity.

They’re up against a creepy guy from Minnesota who lied about his service and let BLM destroy his state

The other a failed prosecutor who couldn’t win her state so was appointed as the nominee despite no one voting for her. Oh and her senile boss…

Trump 2024

Bingo. I love Tulsi. She is a patriot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When Kamala was asked about AOC advocating for an 80% to 90% income tax on Americans, Kamala replied it was an “interesting idea” and it “should be discussed.”

The PP who called her “Communist Kamala” has some basis to apply that label.

And, such a label is no worse than the silly “cult leader” label someone keeps using against President Trump.

A quote taken out of context? Do you even understand what marginal tax rates mean? Neither one of them is advocating for an 80-90% income tax on 100% of income, moron. Far left liberals may go a little too far in my opinion when it comes to trying to advocate for government spending. However, the fact is, this is still a result of liberals actively trying to do good and make the country and world a better place. When have the MAGAs ever tried to actually make the world a better place?

That’s odd;

- the bolded part you wrote mirrors the excuse Marxists have used ever since they began murdering and enslaving people in the name of their cause. And, you just proved PP’s point, idiot.

MAGA think Project 2025 is trying to do good, and turn the US into Gilead for a better place.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What a clown car.

Tulsi "Assad is the not the enemy of the US" Gabbard? The same Tulsi who grew up in the homophobic and weird Science of Identity Foundation cult?

No thank you. I'm not taking advice or endorsements from crazy people or stooges of Assad or Putin. Same goes for Jill Stein. And RK junior is just a lost nepo baby who plays with roadkill.

I think I'll pass on the whole lot LOL.

100% agree.

[Anonymous]

Trump's endorsers make him look even worse. RK Jr is a loser who is only relevant because he is a nepo baby. He traded an endorsement for a position in Trump's cabinet. His wife has gone on record saying she can't bear or stand Trump.

Gabbard is even more embarrassing. A life long cult member (literally look up her family's cult affiiliation), she aligned with Assad and defended Putin.

Just associating with either Gabbard or RK Jr. should be disqualifying. Trump has these two losers trading favors with him, and of course JD "I hate childless women and can't figure out a simple donut order or relate to people" Vance.

Trump is literally circling the drain.

[Anonymous]

I’d love to see a Gabbard Harris debate again

Great you can run her after Trump loses