Tulsi Gabbard endorses Trump. Will join campaign

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Laugh all you want but Gabbard backing Trump is huge IMHO and while I don't agree with all of her political views I can appreciate why she left the DNC.

Hopefully this post doesn't get deleted. I posted this news last night with little to no commentary and it got deleted all 3 times.


Yeah, you saying it over and over doesn't make it so. Sorry.

She was outed as a Russian operative and election spoiler a long time ago. This is as predictable as death and taxes, and it's only "huge" to people paid to say so.

Clown car indeed.


She was “outed” by Clinton - who had zero evidence or proof.

The only one who already that false talking point are idiots or those paid by the DNC to spread lies?

Which one are you? A little of both I reckon…


Nope. The government of Ukraine has placed her on a list of people who are spreading disinformation for Russia. She's bad news, through and through.
https://theweek.com/ukraine/1015428/ukraine-accuses-tulsi-gabbard-and-rand-paul-of-promoting-russian-propaganda

She is on record as claiming the US and Russia are "not so different" on freedom of speech, which is utterly bizarre as a belief.
https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2022/tulsi-gabbard-falsely-claimed-the-us-is-not-so-different-from-russia-on-freedom-of-speech/

Her anti-US claims are being rebroadcast as Russian news propaganda.
https://theintercept.com/2022/02/24/russian-tv-uses-tucker-carlson-tulsi-gabbard-sell-putins-war/

Alexander Vindman called her out as an instrument of the Russian government.
https://www.newsweek.com/vindman-calls-gabbard-agent-russian-disinformation-after-fox-segment-1733443

She held a private meeting with Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad, during his repeated war crimes against civilians, without any official designation.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/26/tulsi-gabbard-bashar-al-assad-syria-democrats

We can do this all day, PP. If you want to keep posting in support of Gabbard, you just invite detailed criticism in return -- and with receipts.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I posted how much I liked her but looks like my previous post was censored. Most of those posting against her didn’t listen to the speech she gave when she announced or the one RFK gave. I don’t think any classic Democrat listening wouldn’t have to really think about what they said. She destroyed Harris in the primary and was much more popular. If Biden wasn’t only looking for a black VP Tulsi on merit did better than Harris and would have been a much better pick.


Why in the world do you think a *speech* from ANYONE (let alone from one whose opinion means nothing to me), suddenly make me vote for garbage like Trump? You think a speech erases who HE is? Any endorsement doesn’t suddenly make Trump look good, it makes the endorser look really, really bad. The man is disgusting and anyone who endorses him, even more so. And don’t assume I expect this nobody to endorse Harris, because I don’t. You don’t have to love Harris, you can even loathe her, I don’t care. However, when you proactively cheer on filth like Trump, you’re indecent and despicable, regardless of party.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I don’t know why he was at the DNC when they cheated him out of a nomination twice and he knows it


By they you mean the voters who choose someone else during the primaries? Ok. “Cheating”
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Laugh all you want but Gabbard backing Trump is huge IMHO and while I don't agree with all of her political views I can appreciate why she left the DNC.

Hopefully this post doesn't get deleted. I posted this news last night with little to no commentary and it got deleted all 3 times.


Yeah, you saying it over and over doesn't make it so. Sorry.

She was outed as a Russian operative and election spoiler a long time ago. This is as predictable as death and taxes, and it's only "huge" to people paid to say so.

Clown car indeed.


She was “outed” by Clinton - who had zero evidence or proof.

The only one who already that false talking point are idiots or those paid by the DNC to spread lies?

Which one are you? A little of both I reckon…


Nope. The government of Ukraine has placed her on a list of people who are spreading disinformation for Russia. She's bad news, through and through.
https://theweek.com/ukraine/1015428/ukraine-accuses-tulsi-gabbard-and-rand-paul-of-promoting-russian-propaganda

She is on record as claiming the US and Russia are "not so different" on freedom of speech, which is utterly bizarre as a belief.
https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2022/tulsi-gabbard-falsely-claimed-the-us-is-not-so-different-from-russia-on-freedom-of-speech/

Her anti-US claims are being rebroadcast as Russian news propaganda.
https://theintercept.com/2022/02/24/russian-tv-uses-tucker-carlson-tulsi-gabbard-sell-putins-war/

Alexander Vindman called her out as an instrument of the Russian government.
https://www.newsweek.com/vindman-calls-gabbard-agent-russian-disinformation-after-fox-segment-1733443

She held a private meeting with Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad, during his repeated war crimes against civilians, without any official designation.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/26/tulsi-gabbard-bashar-al-assad-syria-democrats

We can do this all day, PP. If you want to keep posting in support of Gabbard, you just invite detailed criticism in return -- and with receipts.

Ouch! That's gonna leave a mark.
Comprehensive and detailed.
I hate to tell you, MAGA/Russian bots don't care about facts, though.
Anonymous
Island of misfit toys.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I posted how much I liked her but looks like my previous post was censored. Most of those posting against her didn’t listen to the speech she gave when she announced or the one RFK gave. I don’t think any classic Democrat listening wouldn’t have to really think about what they said. She destroyed Harris in the primary and was much more popular. If Biden wasn’t only looking for a black VP Tulsi on merit did better than Harris and would have been a much better pick.


Why in the world do you think a *speech* from ANYONE (let alone from one whose opinion means nothing to me), suddenly make me vote for garbage like Trump? You think a speech erases who HE is? Any endorsement doesn’t suddenly make Trump look good, it makes the endorser look really, really bad. The man is disgusting and anyone who endorses him, even more so. And don’t assume I expect this nobody to endorse Harris, because I don’t. You don’t have to love Harris, you can even loathe her, I don’t care. However, when you proactively cheer on filth like Trump, you’re indecent and despicable, regardless of party.


+1 I'm clear on what Trump *did* while in office, what he's *done* since, and both of those are enough to secure my vote for Harris.

Tbh, I thought Tulsi went full maga a couple of years ago. I didn't have a clue this endorsement was a big deal to anyone or in any way newsworthy. She looks like a duck, walks like a duck, talks like a duck - who needed her to announce she was a duck?
Anonymous
So Trump has RFK and Tulsi, two compromised Russian assets.

Harris has:

Anonymous
Ok so…

JFK cheating on Jackie was fine.

Ted Kennedy killing Mary Jo Kopechne at Chappaquiddick was fine.

But RFK JR teaming up with Donald Trump to save America from fascism is a bridge too far for the Kennedy family to cross?

Help me understand?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Ok so…

JFK cheating on Jackie was fine.

Ted Kennedy killing Mary Jo Kopechne at Chappaquiddick was fine.

But RFK JR teaming up with Donald Trump to save America from fascism is a bridge too far for the Kennedy family to cross?

Help me understand?


The voters of Massachussetts elected Ted Kennedy. Don't ascribe that to the democratic voters of the country. He tried several times to run for president and never had success.

JFK cheating on Jackie was par for the course for politicians in the day. I mean, just ask Donald who cheated on all of his wives including the most recent one with a porn star.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:What a clown car.


Tulsi "Assad is the not the enemy of the US" Gabbard? The same Tulsi who grew up in the homophobic and weird Science of Identity Foundation cult?

No thank you. I'm not taking advice or endorsements from crazy people or stooges of Assad or Putin. Same goes for Jill Stein. And RK junior is just a lost nepo baby who plays with roadkill.

I think I'll pass on the whole lot LOL.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Ok so…

JFK cheating on Jackie was fine.

Ted Kennedy killing Mary Jo Kopechne at Chappaquiddick was fine.

But RFK JR teaming up with Donald Trump to save America from fascism is a bridge too far for the Kennedy family to cross?

Help me understand?



Trump is the fascist, silly.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/aug/26/tulsi-gabbard-endorses-donald-trump

Latest news also saying she will be campaigning for Trump.

This and RFK is a great step forward. A real political coalition of Democrats and Republicans.

I like Tulsi and while I don’t agree with her on some things, the way the Clinton machine and the DNC tried to paint her as a Russian stooge - which we know was false - left a bad taste in my mouth.

Harris is toast . She can’t debate, no policy positions, wants to debate and use notes, constant word salads when asked tough questions, not even voted in. Too many red flags for me.

A Trump, Vance, Kennedy, Gabbard administration would be so great for the country.


Great news for the middle aged white guy demographic.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Trump's NSA, Chief of Staff, Vice President and many other cabinet members have refused to endorse Trump, but Trump got two whackaloon former Democrats to endorse him and that's supposed to mean something.


Exactly. Gabbard was never a real democrat and she made that official in a statement a few years ago when she "left" the party. She grew up in a fringe cult and took a lot of money from Assad to put a pretty face on his killing regime. She's not in her right mind and very corrupt.

Kennedy junior is just a joke, despite his last name.

If anything, this is the sign that Trump is in a death spiral.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I posted how much I liked her but looks like my previous post was censored. Most of those posting against her didn’t listen to the speech she gave when she announced or the one RFK gave. I don’t think any classic Democrat listening wouldn’t have to really think about what they said. She destroyed Harris in the primary and was much more popular. If Biden wasn’t only looking for a black VP Tulsi on merit did better than Harris and would have been a much better pick.


Why in the world do you think a *speech* from ANYONE (let alone from one whose opinion means nothing to me), suddenly make me vote for garbage like Trump? You think a speech erases who HE is? Any endorsement doesn’t suddenly make Trump look good, it makes the endorser look really, really bad. The man is disgusting and anyone who endorses him, even more so. And don’t assume I expect this nobody to endorse Harris, because I don’t. You don’t have to love Harris, you can even loathe her, I don’t care. However, when you proactively cheer on filth like Trump, you’re indecent and despicable, regardless of party.


This is true. Harris is bad in the typical sleazy politician way but Trump is a filthy and toxic human being.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Trump's NSA, Chief of Staff, Vice President and many other cabinet members have refused to endorse Trump, but Trump got two whackaloon former Democrats to endorse him and that's supposed to mean something.


Exactly. Gabbard was never a real democrat and she made that official in a statement a few years ago when she "left" the party. She grew up in a fringe cult and took a lot of money from Assad to put a pretty face on his killing regime. She's not in her right mind and very corrupt.

Kennedy junior is just a joke, despite his last name.

If anything, this is the sign that Trump is in a death spiral.


+1
Weird that Trump seems to think endorsements like these will attract additional voters.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: