Trump says he's agreed to Fox debate while Harris sticks with ABC plan

[Anonymous]

They should do both debates. The American people deserve it. All the major news networks are biased for one candidate or another. The public sees this regularly. There's no reason why they can't do both debates, September 4th and September 10th. If there is no debates, the only loser will be the American people.

[Anonymous]

And yet Trump still went on CNN.

[Anonymous]

And if anyone is going to suggest that Bret Baier is actually a fair and normal moderator and not a Trump-crazed lunatic like everyone else at Fox, that’s not true either. He’s just as orange-pulled as the rest of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump has conflict of interest with Fox which doesn’t seem to bother him— or are people already forgetting that he shared legal representation with Hannity? Who employed Michael Cohen?

Leaving aside Trump’s conflict, Fox is not appropriate to host election debates given their attempt to interfere in the 2020 election results. Harris should not debate there— obviously. Buttigieg can show up that day to wreck Trump if he needs the attention.

I think Harris will be fine with doing a Fox debate. But they have to negotiate a date and use the same rules (mics off, no audience--otherwise it's a MAGA-crazed sporting event, not a debate).

I’m sure Harris would do fine, but I don’t think Fox should be hosting presidential debates after paying huge settlements for meddling in the last election.

There were real victims to that behavior— not politicians, normal poll workers— and we shouldn’t allow them to rehabilitate their image as legitimate news via Harris’ participation in the debate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump has conflict of interest with Fox which doesn’t seem to bother him— or are people already forgetting that he shared legal representation with Hannity? Who employed Michael Cohen?

Leaving aside Trump’s conflict, Fox is not appropriate to host election debates given their attempt to interfere in the 2020 election results. Harris should not debate there— obviously. Buttigieg can show up that day to wreck Trump if he needs the attention.

I think Harris will be fine with doing a Fox debate. But they have to negotiate a date and use the same rules (mics off, no audience--otherwise it's a MAGA-crazed sporting event, not a debate).

She would be fine but they should both refuse to go on Fox after the lies they told about the last election. That has a consequence.

Why would she do that? She has no incentive to give in to Donald’s demands. If he doesn’t show up on ABC, he looks like coward.

she should not do it. Neither should he.

Why can't they just do this on C-Span? Trump could have one of the Fox journalists and Harris can have one of the ABC journalists, as long as there is not a conflict with a lawsuit (don't know if this exists or not). And it should take place before early voting starts, which I understand may be as early as September 6 in some states.

Most reasonable response yet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They should do both debates. The American people deserve it. All the major news networks are biased for one candidate or another. The public sees this regularly. There's no reason why they can't do both debates, September 4th and September 10th. If there is no debates, the only loser will be the American people.

Debates help Harris and hurt trump. He won't be doing any debates.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They should do both debates. The American people deserve it. All the major news networks are biased for one candidate or another. The public sees this regularly. There's no reason why they can't do both debates, September 4th and September 10th. If there is no debates, the only loser will be the American people.

There isn't "both" debates.

There is one schedule for September 10th.

Harris may already have something else scheduled on the 4th. Trump can't just unilaterally claim a date and have everyone bend to his desires.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump has conflict of interest with Fox which doesn’t seem to bother him— or are people already forgetting that he shared legal representation with Hannity? Who employed Michael Cohen?

Leaving aside Trump’s conflict, Fox is not appropriate to host election debates given their attempt to interfere in the 2020 election results. Harris should not debate there— obviously. Buttigieg can show up that day to wreck Trump if he needs the attention.

I think Harris will be fine with doing a Fox debate. But they have to negotiate a date and use the same rules (mics off, no audience--otherwise it's a MAGA-crazed sporting event, not a debate).

She would be fine but they should both refuse to go on Fox after the lies they told about the last election. That has a consequence.

Why would she do that? She has no incentive to give in to Donald’s demands. If he doesn’t show up on ABC, he looks like coward.

she should not do it. Neither should he.

Why can't they just do this on C-Span? Trump could have one of the Fox journalists and Harris can have one of the ABC journalists, as long as there is not a conflict with a lawsuit (don't know if this exists or not). And it should take place before early voting starts, which I understand may be as early as September 6 in some states.

C-Spans “most patient man in news” would be a great moderator

PBS would be another neutral option.

[Anonymous]

Y'all understand that used to be a commission that had a standard 3 presidential debates and a VP debate. All of the venues, moderators and rules were worked out well in advance.

Trump pulled the GOP out of it years ago and this is the mess in its wake. Everything Trump Touches Dies.

If you want an orderly process, return to the way things were pre-Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump has conflict of interest with Fox which doesn’t seem to bother him— or are people already forgetting that he shared legal representation with Hannity? Who employed Michael Cohen?

Leaving aside Trump’s conflict, Fox is not appropriate to host election debates given their attempt to interfere in the 2020 election results. Harris should not debate there— obviously. Buttigieg can show up that day to wreck Trump if he needs the attention.

I think Harris will be fine with doing a Fox debate. But they have to negotiate a date and use the same rules (mics off, no audience--otherwise it's a MAGA-crazed sporting event, not a debate).

She would be fine but they should both refuse to go on Fox after the lies they told about the last election. That has a consequence.

Why would she do that? She has no incentive to give in to Donald’s demands. If he doesn’t show up on ABC, he looks like coward.

she should not do it. Neither should he.

Why can't they just do this on C-Span? Trump could have one of the Fox journalists and Harris can have one of the ABC journalists, as long as there is not a conflict with a lawsuit (don't know if this exists or not). And it should take place before early voting starts, which I understand may be as early as September 6 in some states.

C-Spans “most patient man in news” would be a great moderator

PBS would be another neutral option.

NPR or MSNBC would be great choices too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump has conflict of interest with Fox which doesn’t seem to bother him— or are people already forgetting that he shared legal representation with Hannity? Who employed Michael Cohen?

Leaving aside Trump’s conflict, Fox is not appropriate to host election debates given their attempt to interfere in the 2020 election results. Harris should not debate there— obviously. Buttigieg can show up that day to wreck Trump if he needs the attention.

I think Harris will be fine with doing a Fox debate. But they have to negotiate a date and use the same rules (mics off, no audience--otherwise it's a MAGA-crazed sporting event, not a debate).

She would be fine but they should both refuse to go on Fox after the lies they told about the last election. That has a consequence.

Why would she do that? She has no incentive to give in to Donald’s demands. If he doesn’t show up on ABC, he looks like coward.

she should not do it. Neither should he.

Why can't they just do this on C-Span? Trump could have one of the Fox journalists and Harris can have one of the ABC journalists, as long as there is not a conflict with a lawsuit (don't know if this exists or not). And it should take place before early voting starts, which I understand may be as early as September 6 in some states.

C-Spans “most patient man in news” would be a great moderator

PBS would be another neutral option.

NPR or MSNBC would be great choices too.

You are not fooling anyone. Go away troll.

[Anonymous]

Schedules can be changed. Especially a month out. How about a little cooperation from both sides. C-Span is a great idea.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only point Trump has is that he’s running scared. 🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓🐓

Biden is a hands down better president then trump ever was. There is no contest.

Trump just spews lies during that debate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump made up the September 4 date and the rules. Fox didn’t propose either the date that Trump made up or the rules he made up. Is Trump ok?

What rules did Trump make up?

He said there would be an audience. That is not anywhere in the letter Fox sent out requesting a debate on September 10- not Septembrr 4.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump made up the September 4 date and the rules. Fox didn’t propose either the date that Trump made up or the rules he made up. Is Trump ok?

What rules did Trump make up?

He said there would be an audience. That is not anywhere in the letter Fox sent out requesting a debate on September 10- not Septembrr 4.

Democrats don’t like debating in front of real
people. They can only save democracy without an audience.