Frustrated with DH over names

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Lillian- I do like it, don't know if I love Lily as a nn
Beth- he hates Elizabeth but fine with beth as a standalone


Taking these two from your list, one suggestion is Lillibeth, nn Beth.

Then you get the Beth that he likes and the Lilli- that you like, but not the nickname Lily (which you don't like).
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I feel like DH just says no to everything and the names that remain on our list are fine but we are 8 weeks away and none of them are standing out. Our last name is two syllables starting with Ma. I also want a middle name. He doesn't care. But we can't even narrow it down to 2-3 names for when we meet her.

I had no idea he cared so much or had so many rules for names. I'm also trying to be extra sensitive and not pull out a I get more of a day because I'm pushing her out that a few friends have done. My husband has a condition where we needed to use donor sperm/IVF so I'm open to his suggestions and I'm really trying but I'm also running out of names here.

I've added the vetoed names as well. So you can see

Names that remain on our list

Eleanor - it's fine, it just doesn't click
Lillian- I do like it, don't know if I love Lily as a nn
Charlotte- he wants to call her Charlie and I hate that
Clara- fine but again I just don't feel like she's a Clara but I don't know what she is
Beth- he hates Elizabeth but fine with beth as a standalone
Hannah - he wants it pronounced HAWNUH - Arabic/Jewish pronunciation - we are neither.
Violet- growing on me, and was my addition
Sophia/Sophie- same it's growing on me

Names he has vetoed
His reason is always I just don't like it or so and so will get a big head if we name her after then - talking about family members or friends that share the same name

Elizabeth
Georgina/Georgia
Colette
Matilda
Margaret/Maggie
Rowan
Zoe
Arden
Maeve
Maren
Felicity
Rosalind
Tabitha
Sabrina
Rebecca
Emaline
Nora
Amelia
Audrey
Claudia
Winnie/Winifred
Francine
Mallory- I also took the off the list after seeing it meant ill-omened and unfortunate one
Valerie
Katherine/Kate
Ava
Emily
Abigail
Naomi
Lucy
Flora/Florence
Camille
Mia

Names I have vetoed
Isabelle/Isabela- 3 friends already have girls with this name
Daisy- very cute but I see last baby stage or as a nickname
Olivia- too popular
Madeline- he would absolutely call her Maddy and I really hate it as a name
Samantha - one of his best friends has a daughter named Samantha



You are too controlling of the nns. My daughters have two of your names and one goes by Charlie ( her choice) but the other Madeleine never went by Maddy. Just my 2 cents.


She can decide what she wants to be called and if it's Maddie or something else that's fine. But for DH to take two names and insist he will only call her Charlie or Maddy from birth - not really a nickname. That becomes her name. Your child never went by Maddy because y'all probably didn't call her that. It's a loss of he calls her that from birth, mil sends embroidered Maddy/Charlie stuff up the wazoo. If he committed to calling the child by Madeleine or Charlotte and she decides when she's older or a friend gives her the nn that is totally fine but not exactly the same thing


Agreed. This is not about being flexible on nn -- this is about DH doing an end run around a name OP likes by only agreeing to it if she agrees to a nn that she doesn't like. Given the fact that he vetoes almost every name she chooses and also is intentionally calling the baby names he knows she doesn't like as a "joke" I am betting he doesn't even really like these nn or seriously want to use them. It's just a way for him to get another one of OP's names off the list. It has nothing to do with the fact that kids sometimes select their own nn -- that's a separate issue.


So what? Op is dictating what nn her husband can use. If op likes the name Charlotte she can call her Charlotte. Why can't dh use the nn he likes?


Why would a couple choose a name together if one of them is going to use a nn that the other person does not like? And then what if the kid loves that nn and starts asking to go by it exclusively. Then one parent is basically had no say in the name and doesn't even like their kid's name. Just, why would you do this?

Your kid might one day wind up with a nn you don't live and that's life. But it seems like a bare minimum act of parental cooperation to agree on what you will call a child when they are born.


NP. My husband and I chose our children’s names together. We do not interfere with the pet names/names of affection we each call our children.

To my mind, OP is also being controlling and ridiculous. They need 1 name and whichever they pick, a few weeks after birth, they will think it’s the perfect name for their perfect child.

Anonymous
But if they each hate the version of the name the other one wants to use, Beth or Elizabeth, you're going to be hearing that name for the rest of your life from the other parent and disliking it. I'd just go with a different name that you both can tolerate tbh.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I feel like DH just says no to everything and the names that remain on our list are fine but we are 8 weeks away and none of them are standing out. Our last name is two syllables starting with Ma. I also want a middle name. He doesn't care. But we can't even narrow it down to 2-3 names for when we meet her.

I had no idea he cared so much or had so many rules for names. I'm also trying to be extra sensitive and not pull out a I get more of a day because I'm pushing her out that a few friends have done. My husband has a condition where we needed to use donor sperm/IVF so I'm open to his suggestions and I'm really trying but I'm also running out of names here.

I've added the vetoed names as well. So you can see

Names that remain on our list

Eleanor - it's fine, it just doesn't click
Lillian- I do like it, don't know if I love Lily as a nn
Charlotte- he wants to call her Charlie and I hate that
Clara- fine but again I just don't feel like she's a Clara but I don't know what she is
Beth- he hates Elizabeth but fine with beth as a standalone
Hannah - he wants it pronounced HAWNUH - Arabic/Jewish pronunciation - we are neither.
Violet- growing on me, and was my addition
Sophia/Sophie- same it's growing on me

Names he has vetoed
His reason is always I just don't like it or so and so will get a big head if we name her after then - talking about family members or friends that share the same name

Elizabeth
Georgina/Georgia
Colette
Matilda
Margaret/Maggie
Rowan
Zoe
Arden
Maeve
Maren
Felicity
Rosalind
Tabitha
Sabrina
Rebecca
Emaline
Nora
Amelia
Audrey
Claudia
Winnie/Winifred
Francine
Mallory- I also took the off the list after seeing it meant ill-omened and unfortunate one
Valerie
Katherine/Kate
Ava
Emily
Abigail
Naomi
Lucy
Flora/Florence
Camille
Mia

Names I have vetoed
Isabelle/Isabela- 3 friends already have girls with this name
Daisy- very cute but I see last baby stage or as a nickname
Olivia- too popular
Madeline- he would absolutely call her Maddy and I really hate it as a name
Samantha - one of his best friends has a daughter named Samantha



You are too controlling of the nns. My daughters have two of your names and one goes by Charlie ( her choice) but the other Madeleine never went by Maddy. Just my 2 cents.


She can decide what she wants to be called and if it's Maddie or something else that's fine. But for DH to take two names and insist he will only call her Charlie or Maddy from birth - not really a nickname. That becomes her name. Your child never went by Maddy because y'all probably didn't call her that. It's a loss of he calls her that from birth, mil sends embroidered Maddy/Charlie stuff up the wazoo. If he committed to calling the child by Madeleine or Charlotte and she decides when she's older or a friend gives her the nn that is totally fine but not exactly the same thing


Agreed. This is not about being flexible on nn -- this is about DH doing an end run around a name OP likes by only agreeing to it if she agrees to a nn that she doesn't like. Given the fact that he vetoes almost every name she chooses and also is intentionally calling the baby names he knows she doesn't like as a "joke" I am betting he doesn't even really like these nn or seriously want to use them. It's just a way for him to get another one of OP's names off the list. It has nothing to do with the fact that kids sometimes select their own nn -- that's a separate issue.


So what? Op is dictating what nn her husband can use. If op likes the name Charlotte she can call her Charlotte. Why can't dh use the nn he likes?


Why would a couple choose a name together if one of them is going to use a nn that the other person does not like? And then what if the kid loves that nn and starts asking to go by it exclusively. Then one parent is basically had no say in the name and doesn't even like their kid's name. Just, why would you do this?

Your kid might one day wind up with a nn you don't live and that's life. But it seems like a bare minimum act of parental cooperation to agree on what you will call a child when they are born.


NP. My husband and I chose our children’s names together. We do not interfere with the pet names/names of affection we each call our children.

To my mind, OP is also being controlling and ridiculous. They need 1 name and whichever they pick, a few weeks after birth, they will think it’s the perfect name for their perfect child.



A nickname is not the same as a pet name. People can use whatever pet name they want. If they name their kid Anna and the DH wants to call her Anna-Banana then have at it.

But OP is talking about nicknames that are basically just the name you call a kid. It's their name. My kid has a nickname that is the main name she is known by. And if my DH just assigned that name to her, bypassing the actual name we gave her, without amy consideration for whether I like it, that's selfish. It's not a "pet name" or a "name of affection." It's her name.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I feel like DH just says no to everything and the names that remain on our list are fine but we are 8 weeks away and none of them are standing out. Our last name is two syllables starting with Ma. I also want a middle name. He doesn't care. But we can't even narrow it down to 2-3 names for when we meet her.

I had no idea he cared so much or had so many rules for names. I'm also trying to be extra sensitive and not pull out a I get more of a day because I'm pushing her out that a few friends have done. My husband has a condition where we needed to use donor sperm/IVF so I'm open to his suggestions and I'm really trying but I'm also running out of names here.

I've added the vetoed names as well. So you can see

Names that remain on our list

Eleanor - it's fine, it just doesn't click
Lillian- I do like it, don't know if I love Lily as a nn
Charlotte- he wants to call her Charlie and I hate that
Clara- fine but again I just don't feel like she's a Clara but I don't know what she is
Beth- he hates Elizabeth but fine with beth as a standalone
Hannah - he wants it pronounced HAWNUH - Arabic/Jewish pronunciation - we are neither.
Violet- growing on me, and was my addition
Sophia/Sophie- same it's growing on me

Names he has vetoed
His reason is always I just don't like it or so and so will get a big head if we name her after then - talking about family members or friends that share the same name

Elizabeth
Georgina/Georgia
Colette
Matilda
Margaret/Maggie
Rowan
Zoe
Arden
Maeve
Maren
Felicity
Rosalind
Tabitha
Sabrina
Rebecca
Emaline
Nora
Amelia
Audrey
Claudia
Winnie/Winifred
Francine
Mallory- I also took the off the list after seeing it meant ill-omened and unfortunate one
Valerie
Katherine/Kate
Ava
Emily
Abigail
Naomi
Lucy
Flora/Florence
Camille
Mia

Names I have vetoed
Isabelle/Isabela- 3 friends already have girls with this name
Daisy- very cute but I see last baby stage or as a nickname
Olivia- too popular
Madeline- he would absolutely call her Maddy and I really hate it as a name
Samantha - one of his best friends has a daughter named Samantha



You are too controlling of the nns. My daughters have two of your names and one goes by Charlie ( her choice) but the other Madeleine never went by Maddy. Just my 2 cents.


She can decide what she wants to be called and if it's Maddie or something else that's fine. But for DH to take two names and insist he will only call her Charlie or Maddy from birth - not really a nickname. That becomes her name. Your child never went by Maddy because y'all probably didn't call her that. It's a loss of he calls her that from birth, mil sends embroidered Maddy/Charlie stuff up the wazoo. If he committed to calling the child by Madeleine or Charlotte and she decides when she's older or a friend gives her the nn that is totally fine but not exactly the same thing


Agreed. This is not about being flexible on nn -- this is about DH doing an end run around a name OP likes by only agreeing to it if she agrees to a nn that she doesn't like. Given the fact that he vetoes almost every name she chooses and also is intentionally calling the baby names he knows she doesn't like as a "joke" I am betting he doesn't even really like these nn or seriously want to use them. It's just a way for him to get another one of OP's names off the list. It has nothing to do with the fact that kids sometimes select their own nn -- that's a separate issue.


So what? Op is dictating what nn her husband can use. If op likes the name Charlotte she can call her Charlotte. Why can't dh use the nn he likes?


Why would a couple choose a name together if one of them is going to use a nn that the other person does not like? And then what if the kid loves that nn and starts asking to go by it exclusively. Then one parent is basically had no say in the name and doesn't even like their kid's name. Just, why would you do this?

Your kid might one day wind up with a nn you don't live and that's life. But it seems like a bare minimum act of parental cooperation to agree on what you will call a child when they are born.


Believe or not some people don't care about this at all. I know shocking, right? But, yes if it bothers op so much than she should move on and find a name they both agree on ( nn's included)
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I feel like DH just says no to everything and the names that remain on our list are fine but we are 8 weeks away and none of them are standing out. Our last name is two syllables starting with Ma. I also want a middle name. He doesn't care. But we can't even narrow it down to 2-3 names for when we meet her.

I had no idea he cared so much or had so many rules for names. I'm also trying to be extra sensitive and not pull out a I get more of a day because I'm pushing her out that a few friends have done. My husband has a condition where we needed to use donor sperm/IVF so I'm open to his suggestions and I'm really trying but I'm also running out of names here.

I've added the vetoed names as well. So you can see

Names that remain on our list

Eleanor - it's fine, it just doesn't click
Lillian- I do like it, don't know if I love Lily as a nn
Charlotte- he wants to call her Charlie and I hate that
Clara- fine but again I just don't feel like she's a Clara but I don't know what she is
Beth- he hates Elizabeth but fine with beth as a standalone
Hannah - he wants it pronounced HAWNUH - Arabic/Jewish pronunciation - we are neither.
Violet- growing on me, and was my addition
Sophia/Sophie- same it's growing on me

Names he has vetoed
His reason is always I just don't like it or so and so will get a big head if we name her after then - talking about family members or friends that share the same name

Elizabeth
Georgina/Georgia
Colette
Matilda
Margaret/Maggie
Rowan
Zoe
Arden
Maeve
Maren
Felicity
Rosalind
Tabitha
Sabrina
Rebecca
Emaline
Nora
Amelia
Audrey
Claudia
Winnie/Winifred
Francine
Mallory- I also took the off the list after seeing it meant ill-omened and unfortunate one
Valerie
Katherine/Kate
Ava
Emily
Abigail
Naomi
Lucy
Flora/Florence
Camille
Mia

Names I have vetoed
Isabelle/Isabela- 3 friends already have girls with this name
Daisy- very cute but I see last baby stage or as a nickname
Olivia- too popular
Madeline- he would absolutely call her Maddy and I really hate it as a name
Samantha - one of his best friends has a daughter named Samantha



You are too controlling of the nns. My daughters have two of your names and one goes by Charlie ( her choice) but the other Madeleine never went by Maddy. Just my 2 cents.


She can decide what she wants to be called and if it's Maddie or something else that's fine. But for DH to take two names and insist he will only call her Charlie or Maddy from birth - not really a nickname. That becomes her name. Your child never went by Maddy because y'all probably didn't call her that. It's a loss of he calls her that from birth, mil sends embroidered Maddy/Charlie stuff up the wazoo. If he committed to calling the child by Madeleine or Charlotte and she decides when she's older or a friend gives her the nn that is totally fine but not exactly the same thing


Agreed. This is not about being flexible on nn -- this is about DH doing an end run around a name OP likes by only agreeing to it if she agrees to a nn that she doesn't like. Given the fact that he vetoes almost every name she chooses and also is intentionally calling the baby names he knows she doesn't like as a "joke" I am betting he doesn't even really like these nn or seriously want to use them. It's just a way for him to get another one of OP's names off the list. It has nothing to do with the fact that kids sometimes select their own nn -- that's a separate issue.


So what? Op is dictating what nn her husband can use. If op likes the name Charlotte she can call her Charlotte. Why can't dh use the nn he likes?


Why would a couple choose a name together if one of them is going to use a nn that the other person does not like? And then what if the kid loves that nn and starts asking to go by it exclusively. Then one parent is basically had no say in the name and doesn't even like their kid's name. Just, why would you do this?

Your kid might one day wind up with a nn you don't live and that's life. But it seems like a bare minimum act of parental cooperation to agree on what you will call a child when they are born.


NP. My husband and I chose our children’s names together. We do not interfere with the pet names/names of affection we each call our children.

To my mind, OP is also being controlling and ridiculous. They need 1 name and whichever they pick, a few weeks after birth, they will think it’s the perfect name for their perfect child.



A nickname is not the same as a pet name. People can use whatever pet name they want. If they name their kid Anna and the DH wants to call her Anna-Banana then have at it.

But OP is talking about nicknames that are basically just the name you call a kid. It's their name. My kid has a nickname that is the main name she is known by. And if my DH just assigned that name to her, bypassing the actual name we gave her, without amy consideration for whether I like it, that's selfish. It's not a "pet name" or a "name of affection." It's her name.


uh, no. You have other issues that I can't get into. But, let's use the name Charlotte. If my dh wanted to call her Charlie and I wanted to call her Charlotte I honestly do not see any problem. I don't think the kid will be confused at all because it is all their name.

I think if you agree on a name which is tough enough for Op than you should not be so controlling. Who knows? Charlotte could like her full name and ask her Dad not to call her Charlie Or it could be a sweet thing between them.

Anonymous
It sounds like you both like Madeline but you don’t like a addy as a nickname. How about Caroline? It sounds similar but avoids the nickname concern.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Lillian- I do like it, don't know if I love Lily as a nn
Beth- he hates Elizabeth but fine with beth as a standalone


Taking these two from your list, one suggestion is Lillibeth, nn Beth.

Then you get the Beth that he likes and the Lilli- that you like, but not the nickname Lily (which you don't like).


You will be called a Meghan Markle stan. Stay away from Lilibeth! Probably will sue too
Anonymous
I’m concerned that you mentioned IVF/donor sperm at all. Why are you dropping this tidbit? Are you somehow insinuating that the baby is less his so that you should get more naming rights?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Lillian- I do like it, don't know if I love Lily as a nn
Beth- he hates Elizabeth but fine with beth as a standalone


Taking these two from your list, one suggestion is Lillibeth, nn Beth.

Then you get the Beth that he likes and the Lilli- that you like, but not the nickname Lily (which you don't like).


You will be called a Meghan Markle stan. Stay away from Lilibeth! Probably will sue too


As the person who made this suggestion, I had and have no idea what you are talking about. Did Meghan Markle name their child this? I don't follow the royal family and I only know who she is because I saw her in Suits, and later heard she married one of the royals. But, that's ridiculous. First, you realize that in America, the vast majority of people do not follow the British royal family. And even those that do, may not have any idea that there is another famous child of that name. Second, what is there to sue over? You cannot trademark a name unless you're a large corporation.

If you really think that's a problem, you need to pay less attention to the royal family.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I feel like DH just says no to everything and the names that remain on our list are fine but we are 8 weeks away and none of them are standing out. Our last name is two syllables starting with Ma. I also want a middle name. He doesn't care. But we can't even narrow it down to 2-3 names for when we meet her.

I had no idea he cared so much or had so many rules for names. I'm also trying to be extra sensitive and not pull out a I get more of a day because I'm pushing her out that a few friends have done. My husband has a condition where we needed to use donor sperm/IVF so I'm open to his suggestions and I'm really trying but I'm also running out of names here.

I've added the vetoed names as well. So you can see

Names that remain on our list

Eleanor - it's fine, it just doesn't click
Lillian- I do like it, don't know if I love Lily as a nn
Charlotte- he wants to call her Charlie and I hate that
Clara- fine but again I just don't feel like she's a Clara but I don't know what she is
Beth- he hates Elizabeth but fine with beth as a standalone
Hannah - he wants it pronounced HAWNUH - Arabic/Jewish pronunciation - we are neither.
Violet- growing on me, and was my addition
Sophia/Sophie- same it's growing on me

Names he has vetoed
His reason is always I just don't like it or so and so will get a big head if we name her after then - talking about family members or friends that share the same name

Elizabeth
Georgina/Georgia
Colette
Matilda
Margaret/Maggie
Rowan
Zoe
Arden
Maeve
Maren
Felicity
Rosalind
Tabitha
Sabrina
Rebecca
Emaline
Nora
Amelia
Audrey
Claudia
Winnie/Winifred
Francine
Mallory- I also took the off the list after seeing it meant ill-omened and unfortunate one
Valerie
Katherine/Kate
Ava
Emily
Abigail
Naomi
Lucy
Flora/Florence
Camille
Mia

Names I have vetoed
Isabelle/Isabela- 3 friends already have girls with this name
Daisy- very cute but I see last baby stage or as a nickname
Olivia- too popular
Madeline- he would absolutely call her Maddy and I really hate it as a name
Samantha - one of his best friends has a daughter named Samantha



You are too controlling of the nns. My daughters have two of your names and one goes by Charlie ( her choice) but the other Madeleine never went by Maddy. Just my 2 cents.


She can decide what she wants to be called and if it's Maddie or something else that's fine. But for DH to take two names and insist he will only call her Charlie or Maddy from birth - not really a nickname. That becomes her name. Your child never went by Maddy because y'all probably didn't call her that. It's a loss of he calls her that from birth, mil sends embroidered Maddy/Charlie stuff up the wazoo. If he committed to calling the child by Madeleine or Charlotte and she decides when she's older or a friend gives her the nn that is totally fine but not exactly the same thing


Agreed. This is not about being flexible on nn -- this is about DH doing an end run around a name OP likes by only agreeing to it if she agrees to a nn that she doesn't like. Given the fact that he vetoes almost every name she chooses and also is intentionally calling the baby names he knows she doesn't like as a "joke" I am betting he doesn't even really like these nn or seriously want to use them. It's just a way for him to get another one of OP's names off the list. It has nothing to do with the fact that kids sometimes select their own nn -- that's a separate issue.


So what? Op is dictating what nn her husband can use. If op likes the name Charlotte she can call her Charlotte. Why can't dh use the nn he likes?


Why would a couple choose a name together if one of them is going to use a nn that the other person does not like? And then what if the kid loves that nn and starts asking to go by it exclusively. Then one parent is basically had no say in the name and doesn't even like their kid's name. Just, why would you do this?

Your kid might one day wind up with a nn you don't live and that's life. But it seems like a bare minimum act of parental cooperation to agree on what you will call a child when they are born.


NP. My husband and I chose our children’s names together. We do not interfere with the pet names/names of affection we each call our children.

To my mind, OP is also being controlling and ridiculous. They need 1 name and whichever they pick, a few weeks after birth, they will think it’s the perfect name for their perfect child.



A nickname is not the same as a pet name. People can use whatever pet name they want. If they name their kid Anna and the DH wants to call her Anna-Banana then have at it.

But OP is talking about nicknames that are basically just the name you call a kid. It's their name. My kid has a nickname that is the main name she is known by. And if my DH just assigned that name to her, bypassing the actual name we gave her, without amy consideration for whether I like it, that's selfish. It's not a "pet name" or a "name of affection." It's her name.


uh, no. You have other issues that I can't get into. But, let's use the name Charlotte. If my dh wanted to call her Charlie and I wanted to call her Charlotte I honestly do not see any problem. I don't think the kid will be confused at all because it is all their name.

I think if you agree on a name which is tough enough for Op than you should not be so controlling. Who knows? Charlotte could like her full name and ask her Dad not to call her Charlie Or it could be a sweet thing between them.



It's fine if it's a sweet thing between DH and DD. But if DH is going to tell his family and neighbors "her name is Charlie," a name OP does not even like, that's different.

OP is talking about nicknames that the family will use as her actual name and others outside the family may use as well. Not like "oh yeah DH calls her Charlie, it's their thing."
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I’m concerned that you mentioned IVF/donor sperm at all. Why are you dropping this tidbit? Are you somehow insinuating that the baby is less his so that you should get more naming rights?


I'm concerned about you're ability to read. OP said right before that sentence she is trying extra hard to not pull rank like others she knows because she is being sensitive to their situation. JFC.

I know many girlfriends that used the whole im doing all the hard work I get to name the kid excuse. OP is at least trying
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I’m concerned that you mentioned IVF/donor sperm at all. Why are you dropping this tidbit? Are you somehow insinuating that the baby is less his so that you should get more naming rights?


The opposite-- OP is sensitive to the idea that her DH wants to feel connected to the name because he may feel weird about having used donor sperm, which is why she is bending over backwards to try and accommodate his highly rigid approach to names and us trying to convince herself to like some of the names he has suggested (since he's vetoing all the names she suggests).
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I’m concerned that you mentioned IVF/donor sperm at all. Why are you dropping this tidbit? Are you somehow insinuating that the baby is less his so that you should get more naming rights?


The opposite actually. If we didn't have the journey we have had I would probably pull the labor card at some point or make some 60/40 rule or something crazy at this point but I want DH to feel connected and he does for other reasons but I want him to be as involved as possible in all the decisions because this is a delicate situation.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Lillian- I do like it, don't know if I love Lily as a nn
Beth- he hates Elizabeth but fine with beth as a standalone


Taking these two from your list, one suggestion is Lillibeth, nn Beth.

Then you get the Beth that he likes and the Lilli- that you like, but not the nickname Lily (which you don't like).


You will be called a Meghan Markle stan. Stay away from Lilibeth! Probably will sue too


As the person who made this suggestion, I had and have no idea what you are talking about. Did Meghan Markle name their child this? I don't follow the royal family and I only know who she is because I saw her in Suits, and later heard she married one of the royals. But, that's ridiculous. First, you realize that in America, the vast majority of people do not follow the British royal family. And even those that do, may not have any idea that there is another famous child of that name. Second, what is there to sue over? You cannot trademark a name unless you're a large corporation.

If you really think that's a problem, you need to pay less attention to the royal family.


I also had no idea this was their childs name haha
post reply Forum Index » Expectant and Postpartum Moms
Message Quick Reply
Go to: