fcps family life education

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which schools specifically are piloting the FLE changes?

That is a good question. It seems like FCPS leaders and their close friends are trolling this thread. Care to comment?

Comment on what? I want to know which schools are piloting the program. Do you know? My question was clear.

I agree with you. I'd like to know the same thing. I get the sense that people making these decisions are trolling this thread. They should reveal themselves and inform us.

Bailey's, Hybla Valley, and Graham Road. All have significant Hispanic populations, and most importantly, POOR (lawsuits are not a worry should a parent become aware). They will take the path of least resistance

Link?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There isn’t an upcoming vote. They’ve decided to keep genders separate for next year thankfully.

It looks like they are combining genders for family life education in the pilot program.

The low income ESOL families have some of the most traditional families.

This is a twrrible idea.

If fcps is going to combine boys and girls for sex ed, it needs to be in the wealthiest bluest communities in northern Virginia, not the poor immigrant communities.

Pilot it in the wealthy neighborhoods with the greatest percentage of democrat votes. I am sure those neighborhoods will be thrilled to have boys and hirls together for 5th-8th grade sex ed.

OMG boys and girls learning about boobies together and boy parts. OMG OMG OMG OMG
OMB boys and girls learning how to talk to each other about sex omg omg omg

Kids are smarter than parents.

This is a juvenile comment. In a survey last year, parents said they didn't want their kids learning about these things with the opposite sex. It seems weird that fcps would start a pilot program doing just that. Your immature scrutiny is misplaced. We should be asking the school board why they're starting this program and not making fun of parents for their questions and concerns.

DP
I’m not going to make fun. I agree, there’s no purpose for that. I don’t really see what’s wrong with same gender classes for FLE. The topics are natural science. Perhaps we should work to move past the “hush hush”, secretive air that surrounds such topics.

Perhaps if men had even a basic understanding of women’s biology, we wouldn’t get moron’s talking about reimplanting ectopic pregnancies or how they aren’t life threatening and thus shouldn’t be treated until they rupture and/or become septic.


The hush hush don’t talk about “boy parts”/“girl parts” in mixed company has real life negative consequences.

In FCPS, both genders receive the same lessons. They receive them separated by gender.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There isn’t an upcoming vote. They’ve decided to keep genders separate for next year thankfully.

It looks like they are combining genders for family life education in the pilot program.

The low income ESOL families have some of the most traditional families.

This is a twrrible idea.

If fcps is going to combine boys and girls for sex ed, it needs to be in the wealthiest bluest communities in northern Virginia, not the poor immigrant communities.

Pilot it in the wealthy neighborhoods with the greatest percentage of democrat votes. I am sure those neighborhoods will be thrilled to have boys and hirls together for 5th-8th grade sex ed.

OMG boys and girls learning about boobies together and boy parts. OMG OMG OMG OMG
OMB boys and girls learning how to talk to each other about sex omg omg omg

Kids are smarter than parents.

This is a juvenile comment. In a survey last year, parents said they didn't want their kids learning about these things with the opposite sex. It seems weird that fcps would start a pilot program doing just that. Your immature scrutiny is misplaced. We should be asking the school board why they're starting this program and not making fun of parents for their questions and concerns.

DP
I’m not going to make fun. I agree, there’s no purpose for that. I don’t really see what’s wrong with same gender classes for FLE. The topics are natural science. Perhaps we should work to move past the “hush hush”, secretive air that surrounds such topics.

Perhaps if men had even a basic understanding of women’s biology, we wouldn’t get moron’s talking about reimplanting ectopic pregnancies or how they aren’t life threatening and thus shouldn’t be treated until they rupture and/or become septic.


The hush hush don’t talk about “boy parts”/“girl parts” in mixed company has real life negative consequences.

In FCPS, both genders receive the same lessons. They receive them separated by gender.

Not correct. The genders have some gender-specific elements that are not shared/show to other.

[Anonymous]

This article expands on what is at stake with the proposed FLE changes:

https://fairfaxschoolsmonitor.com/the-transgender-agenda-at-fcps-whats-next/

Worth watching video beginning at 1:13:00 through 1:17:27:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=co9fdU0jHwo

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This article expands on what is at stake with the proposed FLE changes:

https://fairfaxschoolsmonitor.com/the-transgender-agenda-at-fcps-whats-next/

Worth watching video beginning at 1:13:00 through 1:17:27:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=co9fdU0jHwo

He’s got some nuts to openly declare to the world that he’s a bigot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If it's true they are piloting this at ESOL heavy low income schools under the guise of "expanding" it later, that is really dirty. Our school has had an influx of kids this year who speak no English (and now there are so many they don't even have to try) so basically it sounds like they are going to give these lessons in English, receive no pushback because the kids nor parents know what's being taught and they can use lack of resistance to push this thing wider.

Agree. If that is what they are doing, it is pretty low.

Has anyone presented any evidence that they are? Besides someone who says they heard it at a meeting? If so, post minutes. Otherwise, weak trolling.

This article helps understand how the pilot program has been handled:
https://fairfaxschoolsmonitor.com/unisex-sex-ed-classes-are-being-implemented-in-fcps-elementary-and-middle-schools/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There isn’t an upcoming vote. They’ve decided to keep genders separate for next year thankfully.

It looks like they are combining genders for family life education in the pilot program.

The low income ESOL families have some of the most traditional families.

This is a twrrible idea.

If fcps is going to combine boys and girls for sex ed, it needs to be in the wealthiest bluest communities in northern Virginia, not the poor immigrant communities.

Pilot it in the wealthy neighborhoods with the greatest percentage of democrat votes. I am sure those neighborhoods will be thrilled to have boys and hirls together for 5th-8th grade sex ed.

OMG boys and girls learning about boobies together and boy parts. OMG OMG OMG OMG
OMB boys and girls learning how to talk to each other about sex omg omg omg

Kids are smarter than parents.

This is a juvenile comment. In a survey last year, parents said they didn't want their kids learning about these things with the opposite sex. It seems weird that fcps would start a pilot program doing just that. Your immature scrutiny is misplaced. We should be asking the school board why they're starting this program and not making fun of parents for their questions and concerns.

DP
I’m not going to make fun. I agree, there’s no purpose for that. I don’t really see what’s wrong with same gender classes for FLE. The topics are natural science. Perhaps we should work to move past the “hush hush”, secretive air that surrounds such topics.

I have kids who can’t PRAY in the same room as the opposite sex and you want them to talk about menstrual flow and erections in front of the opposite sex. These kids NEED this information and combining sexes together will just cause more of them to opt out and never learn the facts about their own bodies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There isn’t an upcoming vote. They’ve decided to keep genders separate for next year thankfully.

It looks like they are combining genders for family life education in the pilot program.

The low income ESOL families have some of the most traditional families.

This is a twrrible idea.

If fcps is going to combine boys and girls for sex ed, it needs to be in the wealthiest bluest communities in northern Virginia, not the poor immigrant communities.

Pilot it in the wealthy neighborhoods with the greatest percentage of democrat votes. I am sure those neighborhoods will be thrilled to have boys and hirls together for 5th-8th grade sex ed.

OMG boys and girls learning about boobies together and boy parts. OMG OMG OMG OMG
OMB boys and girls learning how to talk to each other about sex omg omg omg

Kids are smarter than parents.

The kids don’t want this either, so maybe they are smarter.

Our Congregation does a full year program in 8th grade and it includes everyone. It has been this way for generations.

And are the topics the same as they are with the 8th-grade FCPS curriculum or is it a lighter version?

FCPS is the lighter version.

No, dear.

Here is a link and you can see for yourself. https://www.uua.org/re/owl

Please keep your religion out of public schools.

Where did I say it should be in the public schools?

Then what is the point of your post? This is a thread about FLE at FCPS. What you do in your place of worship is a very different issue. Parents and students at FCPS don't want shared-sex FLE classes in the district or in the disguised pilot program for 15 elementary schools.

Is there a list of these 15 elementary schools? Thanks!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There isn’t an upcoming vote. They’ve decided to keep genders separate for next year thankfully.

It looks like they are combining genders for family life education in the pilot program.

The low income ESOL families have some of the most traditional families.

This is a twrrible idea.

If fcps is going to combine boys and girls for sex ed, it needs to be in the wealthiest bluest communities in northern Virginia, not the poor immigrant communities.

Pilot it in the wealthy neighborhoods with the greatest percentage of democrat votes. I am sure those neighborhoods will be thrilled to have boys and hirls together for 5th-8th grade sex ed.

OMG boys and girls learning about boobies together and boy parts. OMG OMG OMG OMG
OMB boys and girls learning how to talk to each other about sex omg omg omg

Kids are smarter than parents.

This is a juvenile comment. In a survey last year, parents said they didn't want their kids learning about these things with the opposite sex. It seems weird that fcps would start a pilot program doing just that. Your immature scrutiny is misplaced. We should be asking the school board why they're starting this program and not making fun of parents for their questions and concerns.

DP
I’m not going to make fun. I agree, there’s no purpose for that. I don’t really see what’s wrong with same gender classes for FLE. The topics are natural science. Perhaps we should work to move past the “hush hush”, secretive air that surrounds such topics.

Perhaps if men had even a basic understanding of women’s biology, we wouldn’t get moron’s talking about reimplanting ectopic pregnancies or how they aren’t life threatening and thus shouldn’t be treated until they rupture and/or become septic.


The hush hush don’t talk about “boy parts”/“girl parts” in mixed company has real life negative consequences.

Boys still learn about female anatomy, pregnancy, etc. during their FLE lessons. It’s just done in a class of only boys. What likely happened with those morons is that their parents opted them out of FLE every year of school. Which is what we’ll get more of if we combine sexes in the same class.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There isn’t an upcoming vote. They’ve decided to keep genders separate for next year thankfully.

It looks like they are combining genders for family life education in the pilot program.

The low income ESOL families have some of the most traditional families.

This is a twrrible idea.

If fcps is going to combine boys and girls for sex ed, it needs to be in the wealthiest bluest communities in northern Virginia, not the poor immigrant communities.

Pilot it in the wealthy neighborhoods with the greatest percentage of democrat votes. I am sure those neighborhoods will be thrilled to have boys and hirls together for 5th-8th grade sex ed.

OMG boys and girls learning about boobies together and boy parts. OMG OMG OMG OMG
OMB boys and girls learning how to talk to each other about sex omg omg omg

Kids are smarter than parents.

This is a juvenile comment. In a survey last year, parents said they didn't want their kids learning about these things with the opposite sex. It seems weird that fcps would start a pilot program doing just that. Your immature scrutiny is misplaced. We should be asking the school board why they're starting this program and not making fun of parents for their questions and concerns.

DP
I’m not going to make fun. I agree, there’s no purpose for that. I don’t really see what’s wrong with same gender classes for FLE. The topics are natural science. Perhaps we should work to move past the “hush hush”, secretive air that surrounds such topics.

Perhaps if men had even a basic understanding of women’s biology, we wouldn’t get moron’s talking about reimplanting ectopic pregnancies or how they aren’t life threatening and thus shouldn’t be treated until they rupture and/or become septic.


The hush hush don’t talk about “boy parts”/“girl parts” in mixed company has real life negative consequences.

In FCPS, both genders receive the same lessons. They receive them separated by gender.

Not correct. The genders have some gender-specific elements that are not shared/show to other.

Shouldn’t they base it on sex and not gender?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There isn’t an upcoming vote. They’ve decided to keep genders separate for next year thankfully.

It looks like they are combining genders for family life education in the pilot program.

The low income ESOL families have some of the most traditional families.

This is a twrrible idea.

If fcps is going to combine boys and girls for sex ed, it needs to be in the wealthiest bluest communities in northern Virginia, not the poor immigrant communities.

Pilot it in the wealthy neighborhoods with the greatest percentage of democrat votes. I am sure those neighborhoods will be thrilled to have boys and hirls together for 5th-8th grade sex ed.

OMG boys and girls learning about boobies together and boy parts. OMG OMG OMG OMG
OMB boys and girls learning how to talk to each other about sex omg omg omg

Kids are smarter than parents.

This is a juvenile comment. In a survey last year, parents said they didn't want their kids learning about these things with the opposite sex. It seems weird that fcps would start a pilot program doing just that. Your immature scrutiny is misplaced. We should be asking the school board why they're starting this program and not making fun of parents for their questions and concerns.

DP
I’m not going to make fun. I agree, there’s no purpose for that. I don’t really see what’s wrong with same gender classes for FLE. The topics are natural science. Perhaps we should work to move past the “hush hush”, secretive air that surrounds such topics.

I have kids who can’t PRAY in the same room as the opposite sex and you want them to talk about menstrual flow and erections in front of the opposite sex. These kids NEED this information and combining sexes together will just cause more of them to opt out and never learn the facts about their own bodies.

Why can’t they? They can pray until their hearts are content.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There isn’t an upcoming vote. They’ve decided to keep genders separate for next year thankfully.

It looks like they are combining genders for family life education in the pilot program.

The low income ESOL families have some of the most traditional families.

This is a twrrible idea.

If fcps is going to combine boys and girls for sex ed, it needs to be in the wealthiest bluest communities in northern Virginia, not the poor immigrant communities.

Pilot it in the wealthy neighborhoods with the greatest percentage of democrat votes. I am sure those neighborhoods will be thrilled to have boys and hirls together for 5th-8th grade sex ed.

OMG boys and girls learning about boobies together and boy parts. OMG OMG OMG OMG
OMB boys and girls learning how to talk to each other about sex omg omg omg

Kids are smarter than parents.

This is a juvenile comment. In a survey last year, parents said they didn't want their kids learning about these things with the opposite sex. It seems weird that fcps would start a pilot program doing just that. Your immature scrutiny is misplaced. We should be asking the school board why they're starting this program and not making fun of parents for their questions and concerns.

DP
I’m not going to make fun. I agree, there’s no purpose for that. I don’t really see what’s wrong with same gender classes for FLE. The topics are natural science. Perhaps we should work to move past the “hush hush”, secretive air that surrounds such topics.

I have kids who can’t PRAY in the same room as the opposite sex and you want them to talk about menstrual flow and erections in front of the opposite sex. These kids NEED this information and combining sexes together will just cause more of them to opt out and never learn the facts about their own bodies.

Why can’t they? They can pray until their hearts are content.

I don’t think you understand what the PP was saying, in some religions they don’t pray in the same area.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There isn’t an upcoming vote. They’ve decided to keep genders separate for next year thankfully.

It looks like they are combining genders for family life education in the pilot program.

The low income ESOL families have some of the most traditional families.

This is a twrrible idea.

If fcps is going to combine boys and girls for sex ed, it needs to be in the wealthiest bluest communities in northern Virginia, not the poor immigrant communities.

Pilot it in the wealthy neighborhoods with the greatest percentage of democrat votes. I am sure those neighborhoods will be thrilled to have boys and hirls together for 5th-8th grade sex ed.

OMG boys and girls learning about boobies together and boy parts. OMG OMG OMG OMG
OMB boys and girls learning how to talk to each other about sex omg omg omg

Kids are smarter than parents.

This is a juvenile comment. In a survey last year, parents said they didn't want their kids learning about these things with the opposite sex. It seems weird that fcps would start a pilot program doing just that. Your immature scrutiny is misplaced. We should be asking the school board why they're starting this program and not making fun of parents for their questions and concerns.

DP
I’m not going to make fun. I agree, there’s no purpose for that. I don’t really see what’s wrong with same gender classes for FLE. The topics are natural science. Perhaps we should work to move past the “hush hush”, secretive air that surrounds such topics.

I have kids who can’t PRAY in the same room as the opposite sex and you want them to talk about menstrual flow and erections in front of the opposite sex. These kids NEED this information and combining sexes together will just cause more of them to opt out and never learn the facts about their own bodies.

Why can’t they? They can pray until their hearts are content.

Wow. Let me try again …

They are so “conservative” that they can’t even PRAY with the opposite sex in the same room. An innocuous act. And you think those same parents will be okie dokie learning about periods and erections with both sexes in the same room??? There are A LOT of families that are this conservative in our area. And their children deserve to get these FLE lessons too. That won’t happen in a mixed gender setting.

[Anonymous]

This whole thread is ridiculous

If you don’t like family life curriculum put your kid in a religious private and shut up.

You want your kid to get pregnant early have at it.

No you will not stop the rest of US

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This whole thread is ridiculous

If you don’t like family life curriculum put your kid in a religious private and shut up.

You want your kid to get pregnant early have at it.

No you will not stop the rest of US

Hmmm … I think most people here are saying that they DO want as many kids as possible to receive the curriculum. And that putting all of the kids together in the same room will accomplish just the opposite.

P.S. You have some serious anger issues.