Apologies, I neglected to directly answer your primary question. No, I don’t think the lack of an interview signals anything negative about an applicant’s file / prospects. I really think it’s just a matter of insufficient nearby alumni matches to schedule an interview. |
Single Choice Early Action. Harvard, Yale & Princeton allow applicants to apply by November 1 SCEA. This means that they can only apply to one of these schools by the Nov 1 as well as any other public schools. They cannot apply early action or ED to any private schools. |
Also Princeton has REA |
Does anyone know if interviews are still being scheduled for Yale REA? I gather that Yale got off to a late start this year. |
| Yes. Yale is still scheduling interviews for EA. |
Good to hear. Should students be expecting to hear in the coming week? |
|
Kid got a Yale interview invitation yesterday, so they're still coming out.
I'm also confused about how they can be evaluative but not required. I'm guessing they're just for kids on the bubble-- neither clearly in or clearly out ? |
DC area? On your question: yes, very unclear. Yale AO guidance seems vague. They emphasize that this is for “additional info required” cases only, but some say otherwise. That said: very likely for kids who are not clearly out, unless you are a legacy they are simply trying to mollify (we took a good look at your DC!). So congrats on the interview and good luck w the interview. |
It continues to depend on when the Admissions Office sends them out. I just got another applicant added to my list today, so I just sent the email out. So it's not too late, but remind your kids to keep checking their inboxes -- the window to accomplish the interview is still tight. I think that the window for the AO to send them out to an interviewer is tomorrow, so that means it could still take another couple of days, but I've also gotten "red hot can you take one more on pretty please" notes even past the official end date. I'm presuming it means that the kid has made the it past the first pass and is not a hyper-obvious accept/reject. |
I will add more thing in, that I noticed that since they started this new system, I have had more candidates I interview get in (not all of them, but more than one in the cycle) than I used to. So I think they really are looking for something or to get a human impression of the candidate. It's an audition, so to speak, so have your kid make sure to put their best personality foot forward. So many kids look alike on paper -- I see the alumni complaining about "this kid was so great, and they didn't let them in, they didn't listen to meeeeeeeee", but when you do so many over time, you realize how many qualified, stellar kids are out there and there is a kind of sameness, just at a really high level. I don't envy the final deciders having to make the call. |
Spare me the handwringing. Would you really prefer a system where all admissions hinged on a single set of exams? You want your kids spending four years going to cram schools? It’s an interview. They get one or they don’t. It’s not damaging anyone. |
Whoa. Thanks for the update. DC had assumed that these were done, DC did not get an interview and has given up (unlikely that they were in the hyper obvious accept category). still hoping for a miracle of course. |
Interesting that some requests to interviewers go out so late. I wonder if those are cases where the initial interviewer flaked, or where something late in the review process bumped the kid out of the auto-reject pile and into the maybe pile (?). Perhaps both... |
| It must take a while to get through the 7000 files too, no. Maybe that explains the delay too? |
| At this stage, for all those who turned in competitive applications, there is hope. If you got an interview, great: your file is still alive! If you didn't, great: maybe you are a hyper-obvious accept or had a clear file that didn't need any further clarification! |