Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm pasting just one paragraph that I 100% agree with. Drexel isn't for everybody, but it has a lot to offer:
My suggestion is that, if your child wants a coop, likes STEM or design, and wants to be in a youth- focused, dynamic city that is only two hours away (and about three blocks from Amtrak), then Drexel is a great choice. At this point, if that was my child, I'd pick Drexel over Northeastern.
Just like my kid chose Northeastern over MIT
You already said that a few pages ago, so odd.
Deja Vu?
Or I post the same thing so frequently, I lost track whether I already said it in this thread. It’s the weird NE poster that tries to insert themselves in every thread.
Drexel is a good solid school.
Just stop bringing in Northeastern to Drexel and every other thread.
The question was what is Drexel like. The easiest answer is it's very much like Northeastern, but without the decades of rankings gaming. And in a city of Philly with better job prospects, and far lower COL.
Yes, Drexel is a good option if can't get into Northeastern just like Northeastern is a good option if can't get into MIT.
Oh Lord. Drexel and NU are peer schools. No school is more like Drexel than NU and vice versa. NU and MIT are in the same state and both offer four year degrees, but similarities end there.
Not dissing NU. It has a fairly uncommon approach to higher education, which it has had in common with Drexel for a century. MIT has almost no real peers.