Republican NBC News debate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Vivek is the smartest guy on stage.

He’s an idiot. A naive arrogant bro who doesn’t know what he doesn’t know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Finally! A Republican says that if you are pro-life, it has to cover the whole life, not just in the womb.

Points to Chris Christie for highlighting the party’s hypocrisy on this point. (Another obstacle to MAGAS supporting him!)

I have long wanted a journalist to confront so-called “right to lifers” to reveal their stance on the death penalty!!

You do know that the death penalty... is for violent criminals, right? Wow.

Someone who espouses “a culture of life” doesn’t think the government should end life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Finally! A Republican says that if you are pro-life, it has to cover the whole life, not just in the womb.

Points to Chris Christie for highlighting the party’s hypocrisy on this point. (Another obstacle to MAGAS supporting him!)

I have long wanted a journalist to confront so-called “right to lifers” to reveal their stance on the death penalty!!

You do know that the death penalty... is for violent criminals, right? Wow.

Violent criminals…who are alive.

So, if you are PRO-LIFE..,

The life of an innocent baby is more valuable than the life of a violent criminal.

If you are in fact pro LIFE, then a life is a life.

[Anonymous]

Kind of sad that Tim Scott felt the need to debut his "girlfriend" on stage at the end of the debate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Finally! A Republican says that if you are pro-life, it has to cover the whole life, not just in the womb.

Points to Chris Christie for highlighting the party’s hypocrisy on this point. (Another obstacle to MAGAS supporting him!)

I have long wanted a journalist to confront so-called “right to lifers” to reveal their stance on the death penalty!!

You do know that the death penalty... is for violent criminals, right? Wow.

Violent criminals…who are alive.

So, if you are PRO-LIFE..,

The life of an innocent baby is more valuable than the life of a violent criminal.

I thought "pro" life doesn't give any wiggle room for more or less valuable of a life. Either you are pro or you aren't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vivek is the smartest guy on stage.

He’s an idiot. A naive arrogant bro who doesn’t know what he doesn’t know.

Vivek was the loudest guy on stage. That's about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Finally! A Republican says that if you are pro-life, it has to cover the whole life, not just in the womb.

Points to Chris Christie for highlighting the party’s hypocrisy on this point. (Another obstacle to MAGAS supporting him!)

I have long wanted a journalist to confront so-called “right to lifers” to reveal their stance on the death penalty!!

You do know that the death penalty... is for violent criminals, right? Wow.

Violent criminals…who are alive.

So, if you are PRO-LIFE..,

The life of an innocent baby is more valuable than the life of a violent criminal.

I thought "pro" life doesn't give any wiggle room for more or less valuable of a life. Either you are pro or you aren't.

Catholic pro-life is officially anti death penalty. Not to the extent that communion would be denied to a pro-death penalty politician or anyone would picket, but they still say they are. Evangelicals seem fine with the death penalty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Haley is so damn reasonable .

Are you sure she is a Republican?

She and maybe Christie at times are clearly the only people on that stage that can articulate a case for being considered for POTUS.

Agree. I would feel comfortable with either of them as POTUS and I generally vote for democrats. Depressing that Trump is so far ahead.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Vivek is the smartest guy on stage.

He’s an idiot. A naive arrogant bro who doesn’t know what he doesn’t know.

And he's a pump and dump crook.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Vivek is the smartest guy on stage.

Well he certainly thinks he is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Finally! A Republican says that if you are pro-life, it has to cover the whole life, not just in the womb.

Points to Chris Christie for highlighting the party’s hypocrisy on this point. (Another obstacle to MAGAS supporting him!)

I have long wanted a journalist to confront so-called “right to lifers” to reveal their stance on the death penalty!!

You do know that the death penalty... is for violent criminals, right? Wow.

Violent criminals…who are alive.

So, if you are PRO-LIFE..,

The life of an innocent baby is more valuable than the life of a violent criminal.

But what if the baby is Palestinian?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Haley is so damn reasonable .

Are you sure she is a Republican?

She and maybe Christie at times are clearly the only people on that stage that can articulate a case for being considered for POTUS.

Agree. I would feel comfortable with either of them as POTUS and I generally vote for democrats. Depressing that Trump is so far ahead.

+1, I think they are doing a great job staying the course for when Trump inevitably is convicted of something in one of the criminal matters. The Dems should be worried if Haley somehow emerges with the nomination. I’ve never voted for a R for president before but I would vote for Haley over Biden.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Finally! A Republican says that if you are pro-life, it has to cover the whole life, not just in the womb.

Points to Chris Christie for highlighting the party’s hypocrisy on this point. (Another obstacle to MAGAS supporting him!)

I have long wanted a journalist to confront so-called “right to lifers” to reveal their stance on the death penalty!!

You do know that the death penalty... is for violent criminals, right? Wow.

Violent criminals…who are alive.

So, if you are PRO-LIFE..,

The life of an innocent baby is more valuable than the life of a violent criminal.

But what if the baby is Palestinian?

Then it's acceptable collateral damage, obviously

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Haley is so damn reasonable .

Are you sure she is a Republican?

She and maybe Christie at times are clearly the only people on that stage that can articulate a case for being considered for POTUS.

Agree. I would feel comfortable with either of them as POTUS and I generally vote for democrats. Depressing that Trump is so far ahead.

+1, I think they are doing a great job staying the course for when Trump inevitably is convicted of something in one of the criminal matters. The Dems should be worried if Haley somehow emerges with the nomination. I’ve never voted for a R for president before but I would vote for Haley over Biden.

I really don't see republican voters lining up behind Nimarata against Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Finally! A Republican says that if you are pro-life, it has to cover the whole life, not just in the womb.

Points to Chris Christie for highlighting the party’s hypocrisy on this point. (Another obstacle to MAGAS supporting him!)

I have long wanted a journalist to confront so-called “right to lifers” to reveal their stance on the death penalty!!

You do know that the death penalty... is for violent criminals, right? Wow.

Violent criminals…who are alive.

So, if you are PRO-LIFE..,

The life of an innocent baby is more valuable than the life of a violent criminal.

But what if the baby is Palestinian?

PP is talking about in-utero life. Once a baby is born it’s a different matter and you can weigh options. Like tax money is more valuable than a hungry child. According to the “pro-life” movement anyhow.