Biden impeachment

[Anonymous]

Like, if there were documents and money trails that implicated the president, we would have them now and the GOP would be singing from the mountaintops.

They have nothing, so engage in paper tiger BS to keep the base angry.

[Anonymous]

It time boys. Get the memes ready.

[Anonymous]

So Gaetz is asserting that there is a coalition of McCarty, Biden and Jefferies, just as McCarthy opens an impeachment proceeding against Biden.

That is some kinda dumb right there.

[twitter[https://twitter.com/Acyn/status/1701635954513949101[/twitter]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The goal here is not to actually remove Biden but rather to create counter-programming to Trump's criminal proceedings. The ultimate "both-sides". To normalize Trump's rampant criminality.

That's absolutely right. And it's going to work. Biden has been a civil servant all his life but he's a very rich man. There's a lot of material there. Hunter Biden is an addict who's traded on his family name for decades. Also a rich man with no discernible talent. Heaps of material.

This isn't the Clinton impeachment. It won't backfire. The Bidens getting rich from corruption storyline is a winning strategy for Republicans. It will depress the vote. People will both sides things. There will be no enthusiasm for Biden on election day.

Democrats are nuts to roll with this in 2024. A potted plant could beat Trump. But if there's one ticket that could lose, it's this one.

You poor, easily swindled fool.

PP is right.

There is so much questionable activity with the Biden clan that needs further investigation. I have read here numerous times that there is "no evidence." That is just not true.

Explain the money coming from countries like China, Mexico, Romania, Russia and Ukraine and going to 9 Biden family members:
Joe Biden’s son [Hunter], Joe Biden’s brother [James], Joe Biden’s brother’s wife [Sara], Hunter Biden’s girlfriend or Beau Biden’s widow [Hallie], however, you want to write that, Hunter Biden’s ex-wife [Kathleen Buhle], Hunter Biden’s current wife [Melissa Cohen], and three children of the president’s son and the president’s brother

Explain the complex LLCs and the foreign money flowing into them:

The Complicated Web of Biden Family and Associates’ Companies: Biden family members and business associates created a web of over 20 companies—most were limited liability companies formed after Joe Biden became Vice President.

The Biden Family Received Millions of Dollars from Foreign Sources: Bank records show the Biden family, their business associates, and their companies received over $10 million from foreign nationals’ and their related companies. The Committee has identified payments to Biden family members from foreign companies while he served as Vice President and after he left public office.

The Biden Family Used Business Associates’ Companies to Receive Foreign Funds: Despite creating many companies after Vice President Biden took office, the Biden family used business associates’ companies to receive millions of dollars from foreign companies.

Attempts to Conceal Large Financial Transactions: After foreign companies sent money to business associates’ companies, the Biden family received incremental payments over time to different bank accounts. These complicated financial transactions appear to be meant to conceal the source of the funds and reduce the conspicuousness of the total amounts made into the Biden bank accounts.

Chinese Nationals Hid the Source of the Money:Chinese nationals and companies with significant ties to Chinese intelligence and the Chinese Communist Party hid the source of the funds paid out to the Bidens by layering domestic limited liability companies. The Biden family and associates’ activities in coordination with Chinese nationals and their corporate entities appear to be an attempt to engage in financial deception. Multiple Biden family members received money from the Chinese after it passed through an associate’s account. Additionally, Hunter Biden received money directly into his company’s account from a Chinese-controlled entity.

Biden Family and Associates’ Activities in Romania Indicate Influence Peddling Scheme: The Biden family and associates’ activities in Romania bear clear indicia of a scheme to peddle influence from 2015 to 2017. While Vice President Biden lectured Romania on corruption and ethics, the Bidens received over a million dollars from a company controlled by a Romanian individual accused of corruption, Gabriel Popoviciu, through a Biden family associate.

https://oversight.house.gov/release/comer-reveals-new-evidence-in-biden-familys-influence-peddling-schemes%EF%BF%BC/

And, this is just the beginning.

usually do the investigation BEFORE impeachment hearings. The impeachment hearings are supposed to be based on evidence. There was video testimony that showed Clinton lied. There was documentary and testimony that showed justification for both of Trump's impeachments. Where is the evidence here? What you have posted is a bunch of conjecture that even many republicans have said is at best tenuous. That is a VERY low bar to initiate an impeachment and sets a standard going forward that the GOP will deeply regret.

This is an impeachment inquiry, genius. The goal of an "inquiry" is to gather the evidence.
I know you may be confused based on the way Pelosi ran the impeachments.

This is my understanding also, and that with an inquiry there is greater power to subpoena documents, for example, from the National Archives, which heretofore has not been very responsive to House document requests.

I stand to be corrected.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:WTH! I just got this notification on my phone and jumped on here to see WHY? Look, I'm a Dem who can't stand Biden, but this is ridiculous. Is this about Hunter? What is the reasoning?

Biden will win re-election as Dems rally to his side.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The goal here is not to actually remove Biden but rather to create counter-programming to Trump's criminal proceedings. The ultimate "both-sides". To normalize Trump's rampant criminality.

That's absolutely right. And it's going to work. Biden has been a civil servant all his life but he's a very rich man. There's a lot of material there. Hunter Biden is an addict who's traded on his family name for decades. Also a rich man with no discernible talent. Heaps of material.

This isn't the Clinton impeachment. It won't backfire. The Bidens getting rich from corruption storyline is a winning strategy for Republicans. It will depress the vote. People will both sides things. There will be no enthusiasm for Biden on election day.

Democrats are nuts to roll with this in 2024. A potted plant could beat Trump. But if there's one ticket that could lose, it's this one.

You poor, easily swindled fool.

PP is right.

There is so much questionable activity with the Biden clan that needs further investigation. I have read here numerous times that there is "no evidence." That is just not true.

Explain the money coming from countries like China, Mexico, Romania, Russia and Ukraine and going to 9 Biden family members:
Joe Biden’s son [Hunter], Joe Biden’s brother [James], Joe Biden’s brother’s wife [Sara], Hunter Biden’s girlfriend or Beau Biden’s widow [Hallie], however, you want to write that, Hunter Biden’s ex-wife [Kathleen Buhle], Hunter Biden’s current wife [Melissa Cohen], and three children of the president’s son and the president’s brother

Explain the complex LLCs and the foreign money flowing into them:

The Complicated Web of Biden Family and Associates’ Companies: Biden family members and business associates created a web of over 20 companies—most were limited liability companies formed after Joe Biden became Vice President.

The Biden Family Received Millions of Dollars from Foreign Sources: Bank records show the Biden family, their business associates, and their companies received over $10 million from foreign nationals’ and their related companies. The Committee has identified payments to Biden family members from foreign companies while he served as Vice President and after he left public office.

The Biden Family Used Business Associates’ Companies to Receive Foreign Funds: Despite creating many companies after Vice President Biden took office, the Biden family used business associates’ companies to receive millions of dollars from foreign companies.

Attempts to Conceal Large Financial Transactions: After foreign companies sent money to business associates’ companies, the Biden family received incremental payments over time to different bank accounts. These complicated financial transactions appear to be meant to conceal the source of the funds and reduce the conspicuousness of the total amounts made into the Biden bank accounts.

Chinese Nationals Hid the Source of the Money:Chinese nationals and companies with significant ties to Chinese intelligence and the Chinese Communist Party hid the source of the funds paid out to the Bidens by layering domestic limited liability companies. The Biden family and associates’ activities in coordination with Chinese nationals and their corporate entities appear to be an attempt to engage in financial deception. Multiple Biden family members received money from the Chinese after it passed through an associate’s account. Additionally, Hunter Biden received money directly into his company’s account from a Chinese-controlled entity.

Biden Family and Associates’ Activities in Romania Indicate Influence Peddling Scheme: The Biden family and associates’ activities in Romania bear clear indicia of a scheme to peddle influence from 2015 to 2017. While Vice President Biden lectured Romania on corruption and ethics, the Bidens received over a million dollars from a company controlled by a Romanian individual accused of corruption, Gabriel Popoviciu, through a Biden family associate.

https://oversight.house.gov/release/comer-reveals-new-evidence-in-biden-familys-influence-peddling-schemes%EF%BF%BC/

And, this is just the beginning.

usually do the investigation BEFORE impeachment hearings. The impeachment hearings are supposed to be based on evidence. There was video testimony that showed Clinton lied. There was documentary and testimony that showed justification for both of Trump's impeachments. Where is the evidence here? What you have posted is a bunch of conjecture that even many republicans have said is at best tenuous. That is a VERY low bar to initiate an impeachment and sets a standard going forward that the GOP will deeply regret.

This is an impeachment inquiry, genius. The goal of an "inquiry" is to gather the evidence.
I know you may be confused based on the way Pelosi ran the impeachments.

The DOJ has investigated this for over 5 years. The House has investigated it for almost two years. So far, there is not a single shred of evidence to suggest any illegalities from the President. That isn't how impeachment inquiries start, genius. This is just the GOP making up new rules to keep their voters engaged because they cannot do it on policy or legislation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How did the Bidens get all their money?

A publicly disclosed house sale on a property that appreciated significantly over the 45 years of restoration and ownership and then a post VP book deal. That accounts for most of the "wealth" and it pales in comparison to the questionable enrichment of people like Mitch McConnell.

B-b-but China paid Hunter billions!!!!
And so did Ukraine!!!!

Our MAGA leadership says so, so it's true!!!!

[Anonymous]

interesting theory

[Anonymous]

You guys are really out of it if you there there is no evidence that Joe Biden has acted in corrupt ways. Whether he would be found guilty in a court or not doesn’t mean there is “no evidence.” You can repeat that phrase over and over but it is clearly untrue that there is “no evidence” and you sound stupid. You sound really dumb or really dishonest. Those are the only options. Again, whether there is enough evidence to convict Joe is an true unknown but there is absolutely evidence that he has been up to some shady stuff since he was VP and that he blatantly lied about his entanglements with his son over and over.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You guys are really out of it if you there there is no evidence that Joe Biden has acted in corrupt ways. Whether he would be found guilty in a court or not doesn’t mean there is “no evidence.” You can repeat that phrase over and over but it is clearly untrue that there is “no evidence” and you sound stupid. You sound really dumb or really dishonest. Those are the only options. Again, whether there is enough evidence to convict Joe is an true unknown but there is absolutely evidence that he has been up to some shady stuff since he was VP and that he blatantly lied about his entanglements with his son over and over.

Ok, Einstein, where is the evidence? Why didn't Barr prosecute 3 years ago?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Like, if there were documents and money trails that implicated the president, we would have them now and the GOP would be singing from the mountaintops.

They have nothing, so engage in paper tiger BS to keep the base angry.

I am not so sure they have “nothing.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You guys are really out of it if you there there is no evidence that Joe Biden has acted in corrupt ways. Whether he would be found guilty in a court or not doesn’t mean there is “no evidence.” You can repeat that phrase over and over but it is clearly untrue that there is “no evidence” and you sound stupid. You sound really dumb or really dishonest. Those are the only options. Again, whether there is enough evidence to convict Joe is an true unknown but there is absolutely evidence that he has been up to some shady stuff since he was VP and that he blatantly lied about his entanglements with his son over and over.

Ok, Einstein, where is the evidence? Why didn't Barr prosecute 3 years ago?

Look, there is evidence. Everyone knows it and all of the smart commentators on non-fake news talk about it. Just because none of these press releases point to any evidence, doesn't mean that it doesn't exist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You guys are really out of it if you there there is no evidence that Joe Biden has acted in corrupt ways. Whether he would be found guilty in a court or not doesn’t mean there is “no evidence.” You can repeat that phrase over and over but it is clearly untrue that there is “no evidence” and you sound stupid. You sound really dumb or really dishonest. Those are the only options. Again, whether there is enough evidence to convict Joe is an true unknown but there is absolutely evidence that he has been up to some shady stuff since he was VP and that he blatantly lied about his entanglements with his son over and over.

Ok, Einstein, where is the evidence? Why didn't Barr prosecute 3 years ago?

Look, there is evidence. Everyone knows it and all of the smart commentators on non-fake news talk about it. Just because none of these press releases point to any evidence, doesn't mean that it doesn't exist.

What evidence?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You guys are really out of it if you there there is no evidence that Joe Biden has acted in corrupt ways. Whether he would be found guilty in a court or not doesn’t mean there is “no evidence.” You can repeat that phrase over and over but it is clearly untrue that there is “no evidence” and you sound stupid. You sound really dumb or really dishonest. Those are the only options. Again, whether there is enough evidence to convict Joe is an true unknown but there is absolutely evidence that he has been up to some shady stuff since he was VP and that he blatantly lied about his entanglements with his son over and over.

Ok, Einstein, where is the evidence? Why didn't Barr prosecute 3 years ago?

Look, there is evidence. Everyone knows it and all of the smart commentators on non-fake news talk about it. Just because none of these press releases point to any evidence, doesn't mean that it doesn't exist.

What evidence?

SARs reports. First hand information from Biden business partners Bobalinski and Archer, Email, text messages, photographs, meeting attendance notes. There is a lot of evidence and if you have never heard about any of this, you need to change the channel. But all of this is evidence. You don’t get to say it isn’t just because you don’t think it proves guilt. Individual piece of Evidence doesn’t always prove guilt but it helps develop a scheme or corrupt practice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Like, if there were documents and money trails that implicated the president, we would have them now and the GOP would be singing from the mountaintops.

They have nothing, so engage in paper tiger BS to keep the base angry.

I am not so sure they have “nothing.”

If they had something, they would have already released it.