|
NP but I also transferred from a middling law school to a top 14.
First, at least when I applied long ago you did not want to take the LSAT more than once if you could help it, they looked at all scores. It is not like the SAT. I was an art student with a mediocre GPA and a stellar LSAT (99th percentile, it was a different scale). I was the top student in my first year of law school and graduated top 10% from my top 14 law school. See comments above about that law just makes sense to some people. Re transfer timing, I am pretty sure I applied over the summer, but again it was the dark ages. FWIW re all the negative comments about law, this is why it is useful to see if the logic of law makes sense to you and think about what you will do with it. I am in public policy and my job is great. If I were choosing an undergrad major now I would choose PPE or public policy, but my 18 year old self would probably have flunked out. |
NP. Can you expand? What do they hate about this? I took two Con Law classes as an undergrad and they were probably the only two classes I felt like directly applied to my law school classes. I am very glad I took them. |
| History or political science are good choices. The style of writing transfers better than English. |
|
math, specifically pure math
really teaches thought processes necessary for law school success |
Yep-- classic gate keeping. Another example of gate keeping is law school itself-- why do state bar associations require law school degree? Why not allow folks to apprentice for a few years with an experienced attorney and self study to take the bar exam? I know some states used to allow this, but I'm not sure any still allow it. |
Math is terrible for law because the law is illogical and inconsistent. |
It challenges their monopoly on legal education. If enough people figure out that you can learn law in college, the government might end the Bar Association's licensing cartel. |
Elle Woods did! |
PP. I'll agree with that. Having studied some logic undergrad was helpful. |