FLE Committee

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the vast majority of parents do NOT want gender-combined lessons, why are they even considering it? See, this is what FCPS does. They claim they're soliciting the views of parents, but then they go right ahead and do whatever they want.

There are some fringe groups that the school board cater too. Not actual parents and teachers. Awesome, huh?

Just wait until three of them get to Richmond! Scary.

[Anonymous]

Well, apparently, they have tabled the decision to combine genders until the Fall. Maybe, until after the elections?

Reid said that we don't always do what the majority "wants" because we want every one to be "safe."

Why is it "safer" to combine genders for FLE. Parents don't want it, students don't want it, teachers don't want it.

Who does want it? The School Board, Dr. Reid, and the FLE committee composed of Democrat progressive activists. I can only think of one reason why.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well, apparently, they have tabled the decision to combine genders until the Fall. Maybe, until after the elections?

Reid said that we don't always do what the majority "wants" because we want every one to be "safe."

Why is it "safer" to combine genders for FLE. Parents don't want it, students don't want it, teachers don't want it.

Who does want it? The School Board, Dr. Reid, and the FLE committee composed of Democrat progressive activists. I can only think of one reason why.

Reid sucks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, apparently, they have tabled the decision to combine genders until the Fall. Maybe, until after the elections?

Reid said that we don't always do what the majority "wants" because we want every one to be "safe."

Why is it "safer" to combine genders for FLE. Parents don't want it, students don't want it, teachers don't want it.

Who does want it? The School Board, Dr. Reid, and the FLE committee composed of Democrat progressive activists. I can only think of one reason why.

Reid sucks.

They question the results of the survey because "anyone" could have answered it--according to Frisch. Interesting that he thinks that people all over the US are answering FCPS survey questions and that is a problem. However, it is okay to accept huge campaign donations from California for him.

Meanwhile, the focus groups--which were from FCPS and included students were strongly against combining genders.

[Anonymous]

Surveys cost money. Why did they authorize a survey if they were going to ignore it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well, apparently, they have tabled the decision to combine genders until the Fall. Maybe, until after the elections?

Reid said that we don't always do what the majority "wants" because we want every one to be "safe."

Why is it "safer" to combine genders for FLE. Parents don't want it, students don't want it, teachers don't want it.

Who does want it? The School Board, Dr. Reid, and the FLE committee composed of Democrat progressive activists. I can only think of one reason why.

Actually most of the school board seemed against it and had concerns regarding the fact that most people voted on survey they don’t want it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, apparently, they have tabled the decision to combine genders until the Fall. Maybe, until after the elections?

Reid said that we don't always do what the majority "wants" because we want every one to be "safe."

Why is it "safer" to combine genders for FLE. Parents don't want it, students don't want it, teachers don't want it.

Who does want it? The School Board, Dr. Reid, and the FLE committee composed of Democrat progressive activists. I can only think of one reason why.

Actually most of the school board seemed against it and had concerns regarding the fact that most people voted on survey they don’t want it.

The committee wants to disregard the survey. it appears that Frisch and Reid also want to disregard it. After all, Reid said that we don't have to do what the majority wants. We need to keep students safe--according to her.

What is safe about combining genders for sex education? Who is this keeping safe? Instead of combining genders, why don't they let those who are uncomfortable with going with their biological gender for instruction opt out?

After all, if they are going through puberty blockers or surgery, they don't really need to learn about periods or birth control. Those are pretty exclusive to biological sex. But, that would be common sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, apparently, they have tabled the decision to combine genders until the Fall. Maybe, until after the elections?

Reid said that we don't always do what the majority "wants" because we want every one to be "safe."

Why is it "safer" to combine genders for FLE. Parents don't want it, students don't want it, teachers don't want it.

Who does want it? The School Board, Dr. Reid, and the FLE committee composed of Democrat progressive activists. I can only think of one reason why.

Actually most of the school board seemed against it and had concerns regarding the fact that most people voted on survey they don’t want it.

The committee wants to disregard the survey. it appears that Frisch and Reid also want to disregard it. After all, Reid said that we don't have to do what the majority wants. We need to keep students safe--according to her.

What is safe about combining genders for sex education? Who is this keeping safe? Instead of combining genders, why don't they let those who are uncomfortable with going with their biological gender for instruction opt out?

After all, if they are going through puberty blockers or surgery, they don't really need to learn about periods or birth control. Those are pretty exclusive to biological sex. But, that would be common sense.

Honestly, I don’t know one teacher of ES students that supports this. I hope it falls through.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, apparently, they have tabled the decision to combine genders until the Fall. Maybe, until after the elections?

Reid said that we don't always do what the majority "wants" because we want every one to be "safe."

Why is it "safer" to combine genders for FLE. Parents don't want it, students don't want it, teachers don't want it.

Who does want it? The School Board, Dr. Reid, and the FLE committee composed of Democrat progressive activists. I can only think of one reason why.

Actually most of the school board seemed against it and had concerns regarding the fact that most people voted on survey they don’t want it.

The committee wants to disregard the survey. it appears that Frisch and Reid also want to disregard it. After all, Reid said that we don't have to do what the majority wants. We need to keep students safe--according to her.

What is safe about combining genders for sex education? Who is this keeping safe? Instead of combining genders, why don't they let those who are uncomfortable with going with their biological gender for instruction opt out?

After all, if they are going through puberty blockers or surgery, they don't really need to learn about periods or birth control. Those are pretty exclusive to biological sex. But, that would be common sense.

Well said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well, apparently, they have tabled the decision to combine genders until the Fall. Maybe, until after the elections?

Reid said that we don't always do what the majority "wants" because we want every one to be "safe."

Why is it "safer" to combine genders for FLE. Parents don't want it, students don't want it, teachers don't want it.

Who does want it? The School Board, Dr. Reid, and the FLE committee composed of Democrat progressive activists. I can only think of one reason why.

+1
"Safe" is the BS term they use to signal "inclusiveness." Meanwhile, combining genders for sensitive FLE lessons makes everyone in the room uncomfortable and anxious. That's my definition of UNsafe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Surveys cost money. Why did they authorize a survey if they were going to ignore it?

Same reason they paid thousands of dollars to "The Leadership Academy" to develop "equity" protocols. They are an activist group who will do whatever the hell they want to do, regardless of what taxpayers want.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well, apparently, they have tabled the decision to combine genders until the Fall. Maybe, until after the elections?

Reid said that we don't always do what the majority "wants" because we want every one to be "safe."

Why is it "safer" to combine genders for FLE. Parents don't want it, students don't want it, teachers don't want it.

Who does want it? The School Board, Dr. Reid, and the FLE committee composed of Democrat progressive activists. I can only think of one reason why.

Many girls won’t feel safe discussing certain things in a coed group.

Who cares about girls tho.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If the vast majority of parents do NOT want gender-combined lessons, why are they even considering it? See, this is what FCPS does. They claim they're soliciting the views of parents, but then they go right ahead and do whatever they want.

Then quit you're bi#$%$ and opt out. Done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Surveys cost money. Why did they authorize a survey if they were going to ignore it?

Same reason they paid thousands of dollars to "The Leadership Academy" to develop "equity" protocols. They are an activist group who will do whatever the hell they want to do, regardless of what taxpayers want.

If you're so rabidly against equity, you're a bigot. Plain and simple. A fact.
And bigotry should not be up for a vote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Well, apparently, they have tabled the decision to combine genders until the Fall. Maybe, until after the elections?

Reid said that we don't always do what the majority "wants" because we want every one to be "safe."

Why is it "safer" to combine genders for FLE. Parents don't want it, students don't want it, teachers don't want it.

Who does want it? The School Board, Dr. Reid, and the FLE committee composed of Democrat progressive activists. I can only think of one reason why.

Reid sucks.

You suck.

Do you have an education degree? Or have you worked in higher levels of ed policy? I already know the answer to that. Unless you do, then zip it.