a master thread of actual groomers

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Remember the "Sound of Freedom" anti child abuse / trafficking film that came out earlier this summer and had all the MAGAs falling over themselves?

Unsurprisingly, one of the funders was an actual trafficker.

Why isn’t it legally mandatory that all donors are first professionally background checked? Hollywood would collapse in a heartbeat.

Would this have helped in the Harvey Weinstein travesty? What about Jeffery Epstein? Or are the receivers of their filthy cash indifferent, even though both of these serial rapists were widely known (especially to elite Democrats) for their decades of assault on girls.

Funny how you people don’t seem to care at all when the criminal is mega-wealthy, and one of your own.

Now who exactly has Epstein’s black book? The FBI?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Remember the "Sound of Freedom" anti child abuse / trafficking film that came out earlier this summer and had all the MAGAs falling over themselves?

Unsurprisingly, one of the funders was an actual trafficker.

Why isn’t it legally mandatory that all donors are first professionally background checked? Hollywood would collapse in a heartbeat.

Would this have helped in the Harvey Weinstein travesty? What about Jeffery Epstein? Or are the receivers of their filthy cash indifferent, even though both of these serial rapists were widely known (especially to elite Democrats) for their decades of assault on girls.

Funny how you people don’t seem to care at all when the criminal is mega-wealthy, and one of your own.

Now who exactly has Epstein’s black book? The FBI?

Did the movie get ruined for you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Remember the "Sound of Freedom" anti child abuse / trafficking film that came out earlier this summer and had all the MAGAs falling over themselves?

Unsurprisingly, one of the funders was an actual trafficker.

Why isn’t it legally mandatory that all donors are first professionally background checked? Hollywood would collapse in a heartbeat.

Would this have helped in the Harvey Weinstein travesty? What about Jeffery Epstein? Or are the receivers of their filthy cash indifferent, even though both of these serial rapists were widely known (especially to elite Democrats) for their decades of assault on girls.

Funny how you people don’t seem to care at all when the criminal is mega-wealthy, and one of your own.

Now who exactly has Epstein’s black book? The FBI?

The GOP obsession with pretending that Epstein isn’t one of your own is so sad to watch. No wonder you’re all obsessed with pedophiles; it’s group projection.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Remember the "Sound of Freedom" anti child abuse / trafficking film that came out earlier this summer and had all the MAGAs falling over themselves?

Unsurprisingly, one of the funders was an actual trafficker.

Why isn’t it legally mandatory that all donors are first professionally background checked? Hollywood would collapse in a heartbeat.

Would this have helped in the Harvey Weinstein travesty? What about Jeffery Epstein? Or are the receivers of their filthy cash indifferent, even though both of these serial rapists were widely known (especially to elite Democrats) for their decades of assault on girls.

Funny how you people don’t seem to care at all when the criminal is mega-wealthy, and one of your own.

Now who exactly has Epstein’s black book? The FBI?

that's a strange way to say "this is terrible and I'm glad he's been caught, and I hope there will be serious accountability though nothing can make up for what he is alleged to have done to his victims"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you’re worried about “grooming,” aka child sex abuse, the absolute worst thing you can do is leave your kids with adults in a religious organization or religious private school. On a per capita basis for sex abuse, those two types of organizations are - by far - the worst.

Giving your kids a smart phone is also a terrible idea if you’re worried about grooming.

Do you have data to support this? Unfortunately the largest category of abusers of children per capita are family members.

No, that PP is right. The child is likely to know their abuser, but it’s not family as frequently as you’d think.



https://www.rainn.org/statistics/children-and-teens

The PP said church or church school is the greatest threat to kids being abused? Are you seriously trying to say the # of kids who are abused in church is greater than 34%?

Hon I think you’re struggling with statistics here. No, no one is saying that 34% or more of children who attend church are sexually assaulted or harassed. They’re saying that of the children who are sexually assaulted or harassed, 34% of them are victimized by family and 59% are victimized by acquaintances: neighbors, church leaders in school because Ron Desantis said they were good for kids, your best friend’s father.

Your political partisanship is clouding your judgment. Child predators live on both sides of the aisle.

There are institutions that coddle, protect, and hide child predators - like churches - that are associated with the right. You really just don't find that on the left in the same way. Yeah I know BUT PRIDE - but there aren't actually stories about pride organizations being cover for sexual predation against children. Yeah, there are some photos of kids at pride that don't look fantastic - but I have never in my life heard any actual accusation that a child was predated on at a pride event, and especially not that a kid was predated on and then a pride organization covered up what happened and protected the predator not the kid.

Epstein seems like an equal opportunity corrupter, if you want to drag him in here. No one of any party came out looking good from that. But I don't think that one example justifies any BOTH SIDESism here.

Why are you associating churches with the right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you’re worried about “grooming,” aka child sex abuse, the absolute worst thing you can do is leave your kids with adults in a religious organization or religious private school. On a per capita basis for sex abuse, those two types of organizations are - by far - the worst.

Giving your kids a smart phone is also a terrible idea if you’re worried about grooming.

Do you have data to support this? Unfortunately the largest category of abusers of children per capita are family members.

No, that PP is right. The child is likely to know their abuser, but it’s not family as frequently as you’d think.



https://www.rainn.org/statistics/children-and-teens

The PP said church or church school is the greatest threat to kids being abused? Are you seriously trying to say the # of kids who are abused in church is greater than 34%?

Hon I think you’re struggling with statistics here. No, no one is saying that 34% or more of children who attend church are sexually assaulted or harassed. They’re saying that of the children who are sexually assaulted or harassed, 34% of them are victimized by family and 59% are victimized by acquaintances: neighbors, church leaders in school because Ron Desantis said they were good for kids, your best friend’s father.

Your political partisanship is clouding your judgment. Child predators live on both sides of the aisle.

There are institutions that coddle, protect, and hide child predators - like churches - that are associated with the right. You really just don't find that on the left in the same way. Yeah I know BUT PRIDE - but there aren't actually stories about pride organizations being cover for sexual predation against children. Yeah, there are some photos of kids at pride that don't look fantastic - but I have never in my life heard any actual accusation that a child was predated on at a pride event, and especially not that a kid was predated on and then a pride organization covered up what happened and protected the predator not the kid.

Epstein seems like an equal opportunity corrupter, if you want to drag him in here. No one of any party came out looking good from that. But I don't think that one example justifies any BOTH SIDESism here.

Why are you associating churches with the right?

Probably because so many of them actively (and illegally) involve themselves in politicking for right wingers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Remember the "Sound of Freedom" anti child abuse / trafficking film that came out earlier this summer and had all the MAGAs falling over themselves?

Unsurprisingly, one of the funders was an actual trafficker.

Why isn’t it legally mandatory that all donors are first professionally background checked? Hollywood would collapse in a heartbeat.

Would this have helped in the Harvey Weinstein travesty? What about Jeffery Epstein? Or are the receivers of their filthy cash indifferent, even though both of these serial rapists were widely known (especially to elite Democrats) for their decades of assault on girls.

Funny how you people don’t seem to care at all when the criminal is mega-wealthy, and one of your own.

Now who exactly has Epstein’s black book? The FBI?

that's a strange way to say "this is terrible and I'm glad he's been caught, and I hope there will be serious accountability though nothing can make up for what he is alleged to have done to his victims"

It’s the only way to say the obvious:
Democrats will go after anyone they can associate with conservatives. Still waiting for any of the countless Democrats flying the Lolita to get investigated. Everyone knows that’ll never happen. Why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Remember the "Sound of Freedom" anti child abuse / trafficking film that came out earlier this summer and had all the MAGAs falling over themselves?

Unsurprisingly, one of the funders was an actual trafficker.

Why isn’t it legally mandatory that all donors are first professionally background checked? Hollywood would collapse in a heartbeat.

Would this have helped in the Harvey Weinstein travesty? What about Jeffery Epstein? Or are the receivers of their filthy cash indifferent, even though both of these serial rapists were widely known (especially to elite Democrats) for their decades of assault on girls.

Funny how you people don’t seem to care at all when the criminal is mega-wealthy, and one of your own.

Now who exactly has Epstein’s black book? The FBI?

that's a strange way to say "this is terrible and I'm glad he's been caught, and I hope there will be serious accountability though nothing can make up for what he is alleged to have done to his victims"

It’s the only way to say the obvious:
Democrats will go after anyone they can associate with conservatives. Still waiting for any of the countless Democrats flying the Lolita to get investigated. Everyone knows that’ll never happen. Why?

again, what an odd way to say you’re glad this guy was caught - and anyone harming children like this should be caught and punished. am o remembering wrong that trump had epstein’s protector in his administration?

let anyone involved he caught and tried, regardless of their party. in the case of this guy / let’s just say it’s not exactly shocking that a maga guy who’s grifting money from and riling up q idiots turns out to be a trafficker.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Remember the "Sound of Freedom" anti child abuse / trafficking film that came out earlier this summer and had all the MAGAs falling over themselves?

Unsurprisingly, one of the funders was an actual trafficker.

Why isn’t it legally mandatory that all donors are first professionally background checked? Hollywood would collapse in a heartbeat.

Would this have helped in the Harvey Weinstein travesty? What about Jeffery Epstein? Or are the receivers of their filthy cash indifferent, even though both of these serial rapists were widely known (especially to elite Democrats) for their decades of assault on girls.

Funny how you people don’t seem to care at all when the criminal is mega-wealthy, and one of your own.

Now who exactly has Epstein’s black book? The FBI?

that's a strange way to say "this is terrible and I'm glad he's been caught, and I hope there will be serious accountability though nothing can make up for what he is alleged to have done to his victims"

It’s the only way to say the obvious:
Democrats will go after anyone they can associate with conservatives. Still waiting for any of the countless Democrats flying the Lolita to get investigated. Everyone knows that’ll never happen. Why?

again, what an odd way to say you’re glad this guy was caught - and anyone harming children like this should be caught and punished. am o remembering wrong that trump had epstein’s protector in his administration?

let anyone involved he caught and tried, regardless of their party. in the case of this guy / let’s just say it’s not exactly shocking that a maga guy who’s grifting money from and riling up q idiots turns out to be a trafficker.

Yeah, that PP’s repeated projection is really telling more on himself than he is on the Democrats. I shudder to think what might be lurking on his computer, you know, ‘cause the Democrats or something.

[Anonymous]

Gov Mike Huckabee and Sarah Sanders love groomers and Pedos

They literally support Josh Duggar and the whole Dugger clan

[Anonymous]

When will our FBI start investigating those who were raping minor children on Epstein’s Island?

Oh, wait! Most of them are DEMOCRATS.

INVESTIGATE them ALL!!!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Remember the "Sound of Freedom" anti child abuse / trafficking film that came out earlier this summer and had all the MAGAs falling over themselves?

Unsurprisingly, one of the funders was an actual trafficker.

Why isn’t it legally mandatory that all donors are first professionally background checked? Hollywood would collapse in a heartbeat.

Would this have helped in the Harvey Weinstein travesty? What about Jeffery Epstein? Or are the receivers of their filthy cash indifferent, even though both of these serial rapists were widely known (especially to elite Democrats) for their decades of assault on girls.

Funny how you people don’t seem to care at all when the criminal is mega-wealthy, and one of your own.

Now who exactly has Epstein’s black book? The FBI?

Reminder that Epstein's protector served Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
When will our FBI start investigating those who were raping minor children on Epstein’s Island?

Oh, wait! Most of them are DEMOCRATS.

INVESTIGATE them ALL!!!!!!

The Epstein investigation was buried under Trump's watch. I wouldn't be surprised if he had all of the evidence destroyed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
When will our FBI start investigating those who were raping minor children on Epstein’s Island?

Oh, wait! Most of them are DEMOCRATS.

INVESTIGATE them ALL!!!!!!

The Epstein investigation was buried under Trump's watch. I wouldn't be surprised if he had all of the evidence destroyed.

Liar. Democrats simply refuse to investigate their own. Oh, wait! The FBI’s too busy investigating protesting grandma’s (but not blm/antifa arsonists and rioters across America), and mom’s at school meetings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Remember the "Sound of Freedom" anti child abuse / trafficking film that came out earlier this summer and had all the MAGAs falling over themselves?

Unsurprisingly, one of the funders was an actual trafficker.

Why isn’t it legally mandatory that all donors are first professionally background checked? Hollywood would collapse in a heartbeat.

Would this have helped in the Harvey Weinstein travesty? What about Jeffery Epstein? Or are the receivers of their filthy cash indifferent, even though both of these serial rapists were widely known (especially to elite Democrats) for their decades of assault on girls.

Funny how you people don’t seem to care at all when the criminal is mega-wealthy, and one of your own.

Now who exactly has Epstein’s black book? The FBI?

The founder was not a trafficker. This is why no one believes mainstream. It was his own kid and a custody battle