Meghan Markle Pink Short Suit at Lakers Game

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks too big on her.

It's a relaxed fit. She's not a flight attendant.

When you have stick thin legs, you don’t wear baggy, boxy shorts. It’s not flattering.

She could have paired the tee and baggy blazer with jeans or pants and looked a million times better.

This comment is just… what?

She has thin, toned legs. They look amazing in shirts and a pair of high heels. The outfit would look cute with jeans but the whole point of the shorts is to show off her legs, which are fantastic.

This is like saying that if you have a narrow waist and a flat stomach, you should hide it under baggy sweatshirts because, ugh, who wants to see you perfect waist-to-hip ration and toned abs. Cover it up! What on earth.

She does not have toned legs. At the jubilee where she wore a white coat dress, her no-waist under the thick coat ale fabric made her look like a fridge resting on needles.

Most fashion models have thin legs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks too big on her.

It's a relaxed fit. She's not a flight attendant.

When you have stick thin legs, you don’t wear baggy, boxy shorts. It’s not flattering.

She could have paired the tee and baggy blazer with jeans or pants and looked a million times better.

This comment is just… what?

She has thin, toned legs. They look amazing in shirts and a pair of high heels. The outfit would look cute with jeans but the whole point of the shorts is to show off her legs, which are fantastic.

This is like saying that if you have a narrow waist and a flat stomach, you should hide it under baggy sweatshirts because, ugh, who wants to see you perfect waist-to-hip ration and toned abs. Cover it up! What on earth.

She does not have toned legs. At the jubilee where she wore a white coat dress, her no-waist under the thick coat ale fabric made her look like a fridge resting on needles.

Most fashion models have thin legs.

And waistlines but oh well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks too big on her.

It's a relaxed fit. She's not a flight attendant.

When you have stick thin legs, you don’t wear baggy, boxy shorts. It’s not flattering.

She could have paired the tee and baggy blazer with jeans or pants and looked a million times better.

This comment is just… what?

She has thin, toned legs. They look amazing in shirts and a pair of high heels. The outfit would look cute with jeans but the whole point of the shorts is to show off her legs, which are fantastic.

This is like saying that if you have a narrow waist and a flat stomach, you should hide it under baggy sweatshirts because, ugh, who wants to see you perfect waist-to-hip ration and toned abs. Cover it up! What on earth.

She does not have toned legs. At the jubilee where she wore a white coat dress, her no-waist under the thick coat ale fabric made her look like a fridge resting on needles.

Most fashion models have thin legs.

It's the calves, she just has bad calves. They are't shapely, toned, or athletic. There's nothing there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think she misheard her publicist. When they said "you're going to make an appearance at a Lakers game to draw attention to yourself" she heard "you're going to audition for a new reboot of Designing Women, so dress like you just stepped out of 1988."

You're making me smile because I loved my red linen outfit by Liz Claiborne that I bought in 1988 -- blazer with shoulder pads, white linen shell, and bermuda shorts with cuffs. I wore it with flats. Such a great outfit!

Oh wow, I think I had the same Liz Claiborne short suit in royal blue. Why didn't anyone tell us to save them for that day 35 years later when they'd be back in style?

[Anonymous]

People picking on her legs are strange. She has lovely, slender legs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also, I think she looks great (the PPs talking about her body are insane, most women I know would be thrilled to have her body and her face/hair is gorgeous), but like his brother, Harry is not good at casual wear. I think it stems from having had to dress so formally for so much of his youth -- it always looks off. I think his jacket looks stuffy and his t-shirt is too white and starched looking. It looks like he's trying when this is a setting where he should look very relaxed and comfortable. William is the same -- he always looks like a stuffed shirt even when Kate dresses him down for family photos and events.

She grew up in LA and in film industry, he grew up in London in royal industry so both should know how to dress for the occasion and they have enough resources, helpers and stylists to help them.

Harry is also always wrinkled, in down at the heel shoes, and he isn’t as fit as William. Whatever the critique, William and Kate know their roles and their outfits always look great. Things are ironed. Extensions are managed. Shoes aren’t a mess. Bronzer isn’t applied with a paint roller. Etc.

LOL, this is a joke, right. William needing assistance to walk on beam three-feet above the ground is not fit with his pouch-belly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks too big on her.

It's a relaxed fit. She's not a flight attendant.

When you have stick thin legs, you don’t wear baggy, boxy shorts. It’s not flattering.

She could have paired the tee and baggy blazer with jeans or pants and looked a million times better.

This comment is just… what?

She has thin, toned legs. They look amazing in shirts and a pair of high heels. The outfit would look cute with jeans but the whole point of the shorts is to show off her legs, which are fantastic.

This is like saying that if you have a narrow waist and a flat stomach, you should hide it under baggy sweatshirts because, ugh, who wants to see you perfect waist-to-hip ration and toned abs. Cover it up! What on earth.

She does not have toned legs. At the jubilee where she wore a white coat dress, her no-waist under the thick coat ale fabric made her look like a fridge resting on needles.

Most fashion models have thin legs.

It's the calves, she just has bad calves. They are't shapely, toned, or athletic. There's nothing there.

I totally get people disliking her as she seems inauthentic but I don't get criticism of her body type.

[Anonymous]

Linen wrinkles. Now if somebody knows how to keep linen from wrinkling, please share. I know some people choose not to wear linen in warm weather, but linen is the fabric for hot, sticky weather, and it doesn't reveal sweat stains.

[Anonymous]

She has great legs. The comments about her legs are weird gaslighting because I have eyes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She doesn’t have toned legs. That’s a wrinkle mess. Stilettos and shorts are out of place in that event.

I used to attend Orlando Magic games compliment of our firm. You would be shocked at the number of women who wore heels and even fur coats to the game. Fur coats in Orlando doesn't sound right, does it? But the women wore them. They dressed up for the games. LA is not DC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks too big on her.

It's a relaxed fit. She's not a flight attendant.

When you have stick thin legs, you don’t wear baggy, boxy shorts. It’s not flattering.

She could have paired the tee and baggy blazer with jeans or pants and looked a million times better.

This comment is just… what?

She has thin, toned legs. They look amazing in shirts and a pair of high heels. The outfit would look cute with jeans but the whole point of the shorts is to show off her legs, which are fantastic.

This is like saying that if you have a narrow waist and a flat stomach, you should hide it under baggy sweatshirts because, ugh, who wants to see you perfect waist-to-hip ration and toned abs. Cover it up! What on earth.

She does not have toned legs. At the jubilee where she wore a white coat dress, her no-waist under the thick coat ale fabric made her look like a fridge resting on needles.

Most fashion models have thin legs.

It's the calves, she just has bad calves. They are't shapely, toned, or athletic. There's nothing there.

Her body is weird. It's like a fridge resting on toothpicks.

[Anonymous]

I think Meghan is pretty, but that outfit is AWFUL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She always looks disheveled. It’s quite amazing considering everything she has at her disposal.
Personally I would not want her rectangular body it is very hard to dress it clothes don’t fit her well.

Would loooove to see what you look like! Ha! You’re talking about one of the most beautiful women in the public eye right now 😂

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She doesn’t have toned legs. That’s a wrinkle mess. Stilettos and shorts are out of place in that event.

I used to attend Orlando Magic games compliment of our firm. You would be shocked at the number of women who wore heels and even fur coats to the game. Fur coats in Orlando doesn't sound right, does it? But the women wore them. They dressed up for the games. LA is not DC.

I'm from Los Angeles and people get dolled up for Lakers game, it's where you go to be seen. The Kardashians and Jenners go in heels...Kris Jenner wears suits when she goes.

The real celebrities sit courtside, but they aren't real celebs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks too big on her.

It's a relaxed fit. She's not a flight attendant.

When you have stick thin legs, you don’t wear baggy, boxy shorts. It’s not flattering.

She could have paired the tee and baggy blazer with jeans or pants and looked a million times better.

This comment is just… what?

She has thin, toned legs. They look amazing in shirts and a pair of high heels. The outfit would look cute with jeans but the whole point of the shorts is to show off her legs, which are fantastic.

This is like saying that if you have a narrow waist and a flat stomach, you should hide it under baggy sweatshirts because, ugh, who wants to see you perfect waist-to-hip ration and toned abs. Cover it up! What on earth.

She does not have toned legs. At the jubilee where she wore a white coat dress, her no-waist under the thick coat ale fabric made her look like a fridge resting on needles.

Most fashion models have thin legs.

It's the calves, she just has bad calves. They are't shapely, toned, or athletic. There's nothing there.

I totally get people disliking her as she seems inauthentic but I don't get criticism of her body type.

Disliking someone you've never met is a-ok but pointing something obvious out is not? We all have eyes. Skinny toothpick legs is just not what's in right now. She probably can't help that and she's free to dress however she wants but that doesn't mean we can't notice what's been put on display.